by Eurasia102 » Fri Jul 05, 2024 4:15 am
by Barinive » Fri Jul 05, 2024 4:22 am
by Zetaopalatopia » Fri Jul 05, 2024 8:08 am
Barinive wrote:I agree with most things here. But i think voluntary live-in relationships should be recognized as married under common law. Also do not agree with the no private property part.
by Eurasia102 » Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:21 am
Barinive wrote:I agree with most things here. But i think voluntary live-in relationships should be recognized as married under common law. Also do not agree with the no private property part.
by Zetaopalatopia » Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:38 am
Eurasia102 wrote:Barinive wrote:I agree with most things here. But i think voluntary live-in relationships should be recognized as married under common law. Also do not agree with the no private property part.
I understand about your view and to make effective about romantic relationships live in relationship should not be recognized but made punisheable offense except contented extramarital affairs because Marriage means commitment
romantic relationship while live in relationship means non commitment relationship. Regarding property no private property should not exist to solve dispute among family members like
by Eurasia102 » Fri Jul 05, 2024 8:37 pm
Zetaopalatopia wrote:Eurasia102 wrote:
I understand about your view and to make effective about romantic relationships live in relationship should not be recognized but made punisheable offense except contented extramarital affairs because Marriage means commitment
romantic relationship while live in relationship means non commitment relationship. Regarding property no private property should not exist to solve dispute among family members like
Wait, are you saying that people who live together in a romantic relationship should be punished for doing so unless they marry? What is your reasoning for such a restrictive system if that is the case?
People should be free to mingle as they like without government involvement at any point so long as all parties within the relationship are consenting.
And if consenting to extramarital affairs is all that's needed to allow people the freedom to mingle how they like then I hereby consent to any and all extramarital affairs involving any future partner I may have.
by Zetaopalatopia » Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:51 pm
Eurasia102 wrote:Zetaopalatopia wrote:
Wait, are you saying that people who live together in a romantic relationship should be punished for doing so unless they marry? What is your reasoning for such a restrictive system if that is the case?
People should be free to mingle as they like without government involvement at any point so long as all parties within the relationship are consenting.
And if consenting to extramarital affairs is all that's needed to allow people the freedom to mingle how they like then I hereby consent to any and all extramarital affairs involving any future partner I may have.
The reason for such a restrictive system is first of all I am Communist(Vanguardnist i.e The follower of Karl Marx and Lenin).In mongamy relationship is live in and if they had another partner with consent but 1st boyfrined or 1st girlfriend kills or dump 1st girlfriend or 1st boyfrined and to protect them it will create confusion like prop hunt for Government. please watch the prop hunt video:https://youtu.be/qrZVwTOVr4A?si=KQd9__hzeVvKF22y
You will understand.Reason to punish people who live together in a romantic relationship should be punished for doing so unless they marry is why they should create confusion like prop hunt. To solve this confusion , monogamy couple must marry each other ,after that if they wish to have another partner , he/ she should take permission from his/her partner and then have extramarital affairs without marrying another partner and establish extramarital live in relationship.
by Eurasia102 » Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:12 pm
Zetaopalatopia wrote:Eurasia102 wrote:
The reason for such a restrictive system is first of all I am Communist(Vanguardnist i.e The follower of Karl Marx and Lenin).In mongamy relationship is live in and if they had another partner with consent but 1st boyfrined or 1st girlfriend kills or dump 1st girlfriend or 1st boyfrined and to protect them it will create confusion like prop hunt for Government. please watch the prop hunt video:https://youtu.be/qrZVwTOVr4A?si=KQd9__hzeVvKF22y
You will understand.Reason to punish people who live together in a romantic relationship should be punished for doing so unless they marry is why they should create confusion like prop hunt. To solve this confusion , monogamy couple must marry each other ,after that if they wish to have another partner , he/ she should take permission from his/her partner and then have extramarital affairs without marrying another partner and establish extramarital live in relationship.
So you are saying that we should force people in a relationship to marry on the off chance one decides to kill the other? And I do not see how leaving one person to enter into a different relationship with another would be confusing as it's only a shift in who they live with, assuming that is they don't decide to live alone (Though I guess it would no longer be a live in, but a live apart relationship at that point). Are you considering a simple change in address as confusion? Why would someone who finds themselves no longer in a relationship need government protection? I do not get how you get prop hunt from relationship hopping. In prop hunt you are hiding, but deciding you don't want to be tied down is not hiding in the slightest.
by Zetaopalatopia » Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:32 pm
Eurasia102 wrote:Zetaopalatopia wrote:
So you are saying that we should force people in a relationship to marry on the off chance one decides to kill the other? And I do not see how leaving one person to enter into a different relationship with another would be confusing as it's only a shift in who they live with, assuming that is they don't decide to live alone (Though I guess it would no longer be a live in, but a live apart relationship at that point). Are you considering a simple change in address as confusion? Why would someone who finds themselves no longer in a relationship need government protection? I do not get how you get prop hunt from relationship hopping. In prop hunt you are hiding, but deciding you don't want to be tied down is not hiding in the slightest.
Regarding 'So you are saying that we should force people in a relationship to marry on the off chance one decides to kill the other?' , I did not say. People should not be forced into relationship. I tried to say that after getting into relationship, when they start to establish live in relationship, it is mandatory they must get married.To relate relationship with prop hunt, in game the person is in the form of object and they sometimes hid by staying beside object in the same way if marriage is not made mandatory but only live in between person and one or even both partner have another partner. If they break up with 1st partner and treat another partner as 1st partner. Then Former 1 st partner tries to abuse him or her and lying to Govt that break up never happened. Like hunter, Govt will feel difficultly about detecting the current status of relationship and in this state how govt can protect former partner victim and another partner (treated as 1st partner)? Please think seriously. This is not a joke.
by Eurasia102 » Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:54 am
Zetaopalatopia wrote:Eurasia102 wrote:
Regarding 'So you are saying that we should force people in a relationship to marry on the off chance one decides to kill the other?' , I did not say. People should not be forced into relationship. I tried to say that after getting into relationship, when they start to establish live in relationship, it is mandatory they must get married.To relate relationship with prop hunt, in game the person is in the form of object and they sometimes hid by staying beside object in the same way if marriage is not made mandatory but only live in between person and one or even both partner have another partner. If they break up with 1st partner and treat another partner as 1st partner. Then Former 1 st partner tries to abuse him or her and lying to Govt that break up never happened. Like hunter, Govt will feel difficultly about detecting the current status of relationship and in this state how govt can protect former partner victim and another partner (treated as 1st partner)? Please think seriously. This is not a joke.
But why is the government involved at all? Why should the government have to know who's with who? As far as abuse is concerned, it should not matter the relationship between the abuser and the abused so long as the abuse is stopped, no need there for the government to know who beds with who at the time. If you are talking about finances, then that only matters in a marriage anyway, two unmarried individuals maintain sole ownership of their own assets, only in divorce can one abuse the system to drain from the richer. Assuming that is what you meant about a partner lying to the government about the breakup not happening.
If the government does not involve itself with relationships than it has no reason to hunt people down because they get around.
by Inner Albania » Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:19 pm
by Eurasia102 » Sat Jul 06, 2024 8:11 pm
Inner Albania wrote:Erm... mods, is the OP okay?
by Zetaopalatopia » Sun Jul 07, 2024 6:14 am
Eurasia102 wrote:Inner Albania wrote:Erm... mods, is the OP okay?
This is opinion I gave :
As per my opinion UCC should have included tribes and ban live in relationship but allow only consented extramarital affairs like in USSR under our Comrade Vladimir Lenin banned polyamory marriage including tribes but legalized adultery(unconsented extramarital affairs), though I personally do not approve adultery because polyamory marriage will be harmful for family and children.It is even big threat to children's existance .Moreover polygamy or polyandry will create patriarchy or matriarchy and destroy the freedom of men or women.But in case of consented Extramarital affairs , the first prirority of man or women is wife or husband and 2 nd prirority is girlfriends or boyfriends as these girlfriends or boyfriends won't be able to enter household matters unless they become wives or husbands and moreover no children from these girlfriends or boyfriends as they are 2nd prirority. Only having children among married couples and thus children are save and much easier to manage children for monogamy parents compared to polyamory parents. Only Consented Extramarital affairs should be allowed as it strengthen bonds between couples and extramarital partners. In case husband or wife dies ,then extramarital partners become husband or wife without wasting time in dating.In consented extramarital affairs , husband or wife will not have any tension and ill mental health due to fear or suspect that will husband or wife betray or not. Moreover it will bring mental peace. So The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 is ok provided that live in relationship should be banned, include tribes in The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 and allow only consented extramarital affairs. Moreover live in relationship registration, live in relationship registration terms and conditions and its fine for failure to comply should be abolished.The most important is the Minimum Marriageable Age should be 21 years old for both men and women for gender equity.There shuold be no ground for divorce because not only it interfares personal matters but also violates the rights of personal choice for women. Moreover it insults women .In case of children born out of extramarital relationship , these children should inherit property.Regarding property, no property should be allowed to be private property to curb corruption and evils of capitalism.Moreover child adaptation must be banned and only state can adopt.
by Eurasia102 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:39 am
Zetaopalatopia wrote:Eurasia102 wrote:
This is opinion I gave :
As per my opinion UCC should have included tribes and ban live in relationship but allow only consented extramarital affairs like in USSR under our Comrade Vladimir Lenin banned polyamory marriage including tribes but legalized adultery(unconsented extramarital affairs), though I personally do not approve adultery because polyamory marriage will be harmful for family and children.It is even big threat to children's existance .Moreover polygamy or polyandry will create patriarchy or matriarchy and destroy the freedom of men or women.But in case of consented Extramarital affairs , the first prirority of man or women is wife or husband and 2 nd prirority is girlfriends or boyfriends as these girlfriends or boyfriends won't be able to enter household matters unless they become wives or husbands and moreover no children from these girlfriends or boyfriends as they are 2nd prirority. Only having children among married couples and thus children are save and much easier to manage children for monogamy parents compared to polyamory parents. Only Consented Extramarital affairs should be allowed as it strengthen bonds between couples and extramarital partners. In case husband or wife dies ,then extramarital partners become husband or wife without wasting time in dating.In consented extramarital affairs , husband or wife will not have any tension and ill mental health due to fear or suspect that will husband or wife betray or not. Moreover it will bring mental peace. So The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 is ok provided that live in relationship should be banned, include tribes in The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 and allow only consented extramarital affairs. Moreover live in relationship registration, live in relationship registration terms and conditions and its fine for failure to comply should be abolished.The most important is the Minimum Marriageable Age should be 21 years old for both men and women for gender equity.There shuold be no ground for divorce because not only it interfares personal matters but also violates the rights of personal choice for women. Moreover it insults women .In case of children born out of extramarital relationship , these children should inherit property.Regarding property, no property should be allowed to be private property to curb corruption and evils of capitalism.Moreover child adaptation must be banned and only state can adopt.
How is one to end a relationship with a bad partner is divorce is banned? What if the woman is the one asking for the divorce? Wouldn't banning it in that case also violate the personal choice of women?
What of poly relationships that have an even mix of genders? I see how one man and many wives, or the other way round might have some issues if people are not careful, but in the case where its three wives and three husbands all comingling there would be no risk of a gender based leadership. If you are worried about a hierarchy in relationships then having priorities between partners based on seniority also make no sense. Also, if there were no expectation of monogamy then would that not also remove the need to worry about betrayal? A person can not betray another if there is no promise of commitment to begin with, and no possibility of betrayal means no mental health issue or fear.
by Barinive » Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:25 pm
Eurasia102 wrote:Inner Albania wrote:Erm... mods, is the OP okay?
This is opinion I gave :
As per my opinion UCC should have included tribes and ban live in relationship but allow only consented extramarital affairs like in USSR under our Comrade Vladimir Lenin banned polyamory marriage including tribes but legalized adultery(unconsented extramarital affairs), though I personally do not approve adultery because polyamory marriage will be harmful for family and children.It is even big threat to children's existance .Moreover polygamy or polyandry will create patriarchy or matriarchy and destroy the freedom of men or women.But in case of consented Extramarital affairs , the first prirority of man or women is wife or husband and 2 nd prirority is girlfriends or boyfriends as these girlfriends or boyfriends won't be able to enter household matters unless they become wives or husbands and moreover no children from these girlfriends or boyfriends as they are 2nd prirority. Only having children among married couples and thus children are save and much easier to manage children for monogamy parents compared to polyamory parents. Only Consented Extramarital affairs should be allowed as it strengthen bonds between couples and extramarital partners. In case husband or wife dies ,then extramarital partners become husband or wife without wasting time in dating.In consented extramarital affairs , husband or wife will not have any tension and ill mental health due to fear or suspect that will husband or wife betray or not. Moreover it will bring mental peace. So The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 is ok provided that live in relationship should be banned, include tribes in The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 and allow only consented extramarital affairs. Moreover live in relationship registration, live in relationship registration terms and conditions and its fine for failure to comply should be abolished.The most important is the Minimum Marriageable Age should be 21 years old for both men and women for gender equity.There shuold be no ground for divorce because not only it interfares personal matters but also violates the rights of personal choice for women. Moreover it insults women .In case of children born out of extramarital relationship , these children should inherit property.Regarding property, no property should be allowed to be private property to curb corruption and evils of capitalism.Moreover child adaptation must be banned and only state can adopt.
by Lykena » Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:29 pm
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
Lykanisches Reich
We're still In the Aeroplane over the Sea | IC Year: 1941 | Mood MusicVolksbericht Nothing to report.
by Eurasia102 » Fri Jul 12, 2024 2:43 am
Lykena wrote:I hope you understand the distinction between Private and Personal property and aren't just stripping away people's homes under a child's interpretation of Communism.
by Eurasia102 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:44 pm
Barinive wrote:Eurasia102 wrote:
This is opinion I gave :
As per my opinion UCC should have included tribes and ban live in relationship but allow only consented extramarital affairs like in USSR under our Comrade Vladimir Lenin banned polyamory marriage including tribes but legalized adultery(unconsented extramarital affairs), though I personally do not approve adultery because polyamory marriage will be harmful for family and children.It is even big threat to children's existance .Moreover polygamy or polyandry will create patriarchy or matriarchy and destroy the freedom of men or women.But in case of consented Extramarital affairs , the first prirority of man or women is wife or husband and 2 nd prirority is girlfriends or boyfriends as these girlfriends or boyfriends won't be able to enter household matters unless they become wives or husbands and moreover no children from these girlfriends or boyfriends as they are 2nd prirority. Only having children among married couples and thus children are save and much easier to manage children for monogamy parents compared to polyamory parents. Only Consented Extramarital affairs should be allowed as it strengthen bonds between couples and extramarital partners. In case husband or wife dies ,then extramarital partners become husband or wife without wasting time in dating.In consented extramarital affairs , husband or wife will not have any tension and ill mental health due to fear or suspect that will husband or wife betray or not. Moreover it will bring mental peace. So The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 is ok provided that live in relationship should be banned, include tribes in The Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024 and allow only consented extramarital affairs. Moreover live in relationship registration, live in relationship registration terms and conditions and its fine for failure to comply should be abolished.The most important is the Minimum Marriageable Age should be 21 years old for both men and women for gender equity.There shuold be no ground for divorce because not only it interfares personal matters but also violates the rights of personal choice for women. Moreover it insults women .In case of children born out of extramarital relationship , these children should inherit property.Regarding property, no property should be allowed to be private property to curb corruption and evils of capitalism.Moreover child adaptation must be banned and only state can adopt.
Why exactly should people be banned from adopting children? If the state raised them the children there's the question of who exactly will raise the children. Putting them in mass orphanages would be impractical for the children and the caretakers. It would be more efficient to let other parents adopt them.
by Eurasia102 » Tue Aug 20, 2024 8:58 am
by Eurasia102 » Thu Sep 05, 2024 5:42 am
by Eurasia102 » Sat Sep 14, 2024 10:34 pm
by Eurasia102 » Sat Sep 14, 2024 10:51 pm
by El Lazaro » Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:50 pm
by Blacktower Esthil » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:17 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aber Antarctica, Andrew Carnegie, Breinot, Camtropia, Czechostan, Google [Bot], Lokix Free State, Sardinia-Sicily, Tarsonis, Tekniania, The Eur-asian Federation, The Huskar Social Union, The Lazarene Republic, The Lone Alliance, The Southern Great Lakes, The Two Jerseys, Total Drama 2
Advertisement