NATION

PASSWORD

[CLOSED] On Harmful Synthetic Media

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

[CLOSED] On Harmful Synthetic Media

Postby Blyskalia » Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:13 am

The General Assembly,

Acknowledging the unique challenges posed by synthetic media technologies, including deepfake technology, and other non-AI methods, in fabricating convincing visual and audio content that may misrepresent individuals’ actions and speech,

Alarmed by the ease with which technologies, not limited to deepfake technology, can produce content that undermines the authenticity of information, contributing to misinformation and manipulation of public opinion,

Emphasizing the need for a targeted approach to regulate not only the use of deepfake technology but also the creation of synthetic media by any means that infringe upon individuals' rights to privacy and consent, without stifling innovation in digital media and content creation,

1. Definition:
  • "Synthetic media technology" encompasses both the technological tools and processes used to generate digital content, including but not limited to videos, images, and voices, through the use of artificial intelligence or any digital means, as well as the resulting outputs, herein referred to as:
    1. "Synthetic media"—media in which the likeness or voice of individuals is replaced, synthesized, or manipulated through the applications of such technologies,
    2. This definition extends to the coverage of both the creation methods (software, algorithms) and their produced content when either:
      Executed without the explicit and informed consent of the individuals whose likeness or voice is portrayed, or
      When the content presents a credible risk of causing personal distress, misinforming the public, or facilitating identity misrepresentation.

2. Regulation:
  • Member states are mandated to:
    1. Implement legal measures specifically limiting the production, sharing, and use of synthetic media, including deepfakes, with intent to harm, deceive, or infringe on privacy,
    2. Establish clear guidelines for content creators, platforms, and distributors on the ethical use of technologies creating synthetic media, ensuring accountability and transparency.

3. Innovation and Ethics:
  • Member states are encouraged to:
    1. Foster environments that support ethical research and development in artificial intelligence, synthetic media, and related fields,
    2. Launch public awareness campaigns educating citizens on the nature of synthetic media, including deepfakes, their potential uses, and ethical considerations involved.

4. Safeguards:
  • Provisions include:
    1. Ensuring that uses of technology in creating synthetic media for journalistic, artistic, and educational contexts adhere to ethical standards, prioritizing consent, truthfulness, and the right to privacy,
    2. Mandating the development and application of detection technologies to identify and flag content as synthetic media, including deepfakes, protecting public discourse and individual reputations.

5. Victim Support:
  • Member states are strongly encouraged to provide comprehensive support systems for victims of harmful synthetic media content, including legal, psychological, and technical assistance to address the repercussions and facilitate the removal of such content.

6. Global Initiative:
  • The World Assembly calls for:
    1. The promotion of a unified global response to mitigate the negative impacts of synthetic media, including deepfakes,
    2. Establishing a platform for member states to share advancements in detection technologies, legal frameworks, and educational resources related to the handling of synthetic media content.

The General Assembly,

Acknowledging the unique challenges posed by synthetic media technologies, including deepfake technology, in fabricating convincing visual and audio content that can misrepresent individuals’ actions and speech,

Alarmed by the ease with which deepfake technology can be used to produce content that undermines the authenticity of information, contributing to misinformation and the manipulation of public opinion,

Emphasizing the need for a targeted approach to regulate the use of deepfake technology in order to protect individuals' rights to privacy and consent, without stifling innovation in digital media and content creation,

1. Definitions:
  • A "deepfake" is defined as digitally altered media that:
    1. Utilizes artificial intelligence or machine learning algorithms to replace or synthesize the likeness or voice of individuals,
    2. Is crafted without the explicit and informed consent of the individuals whose likeness or voice is depicted,
    3. Poses a credible risk of causing personal distress, misinforming the public, or facilitating identity misrepresentation.

2. Regulation:
  • Member states are mandated to:
    1. Implement legal measures that specifically limit the production, sharing, and use of deepfakes with intent to harm, deceive, or infringe on privacy,
    2. Institute clear guidelines for content creators, platforms, and distributors on the ethical use of deepfake technology, ensuring accountability and transparency.

3. Innovation and Ethics:
  • Member states are encouraged to:
    1. Foster environments that support ethical research and development in artificial intelligence and synthetic media,
    2. Establish public awareness campaigns to educate citizens on the nature of deepfakes, their potential uses, and the ethical considerations involved.

4. Safeguards:
  • Provisions include:
    1. Ensuring that uses of deepfake technology in journalistic, artistic, and educational contexts adhere to ethical standards, prioritizing consent, truthfulness, and the right to privacy,
    2. Mandating the development and application of detection technologies to identify and flag deepfake content, thereby protecting public discourse and individual reputations.

5. Victim Support:
  • Member states are strongly encouraged to:
    1. Provide comprehensive support systems for victims of harmful deepfake content, including legal, psychological, and technical assistance to address the repercussions and facilitate the removal of such content.

6. Global Initiative:
  • The World Assembly calls for:
    1. The promotion a unified global response to mitigate the negative impacts of deepfakes,
    2. The establishment of a platform for member states to share advancements in detection technologies, legal frameworks, and educational resources related to deepfake content.


The World Assembly,

Recognizing the potential for deepfake technology to be misused in creating and disseminating media that portrays individuals in sexual contexts without their consent, thereby violating their privacy, dignity, and autonomy,

Concerned by the harmful impacts of such unconsensual sexual deepfakes, including psychological trauma to the individuals depicted and the broader societal harm through the erosion of trust in media,

Determined to establish a legal framework that addresses the creation, distribution, and possession of unconsensual sexual deepfakes, while balancing the need for technological and artistic innovation, and the enforcement of privacy and consent rights,

1. Definitions:
  • An "unconsensual sexual deepfake" is defined as digital content that:
    1. Features the depiction of identifiable individuals in a sexual context,
    2. Is created or distributed without the explicit consent of the individuals depicted,
    3. Is created without consideration towards or has reasonable potential to directly or indirectly harm, defame, or distress the individuals depicted.

2. Prohibition:
  • Member states are required to enact and enforce legislation that:
    1. Prohibits the creation, distribution, possession, and facilitation of access to unconsensual sexual deepfakes,
    2. Establishes penalties for individuals and entities violating these prohibitions.

3. Preventive Measures:
  • Member states must:
    1. Develop technological and legal mechanisms to detect and prevent the creation and dissemination of unconsensual sexual deepfakes,
    2. Promote public and professional awareness regarding the ethical use of deepfake technology.

4. Exceptions:
  • This resolution does not apply to:
    1. The use of deepfake technology for legitimate purposes such as research, artistic expression, or education, provided it does not infringe on individual consent and privacy,
    2. The application of this technology by law enforcement or judicial authorities under strict legal oversight for the purposes of criminal investigation or prosecution.

5. Support for Victims:
  • Member states are encouraged to provide support services for individuals affected by unconsensual sexual deepfakes, including but not limited to psychological support, legal aid, and assistance in content removal.

6. International Cooperation:
  • The World Assembly advocates for:
    1. The collaboration between member and non-member states in developing international standards and tools for combating the creation and distribution of unconsensual sexual deepfakes,
    2. The exchange of information, best practices, and resources to bolster global efforts against such exploitation.
Last edited by Blyskalia on Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:05 pm, edited 11 times in total.

User avatar
Coronavirus
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jan 24, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Coronavirus » Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:18 pm

General Overview:
The resolution's intent to address the misuse of deepfake technology is commendable. However, the draft suffers from vagueness, overbreadth, potential for abuse, and a lack of specific mechanisms for enforcement. It reads more like a wish list than a actionable plan. Let's delve into specifics.

1. Definitions:
The definition provided is a good starting point but lacks technical precision. What constitutes "reasonable potential to harm" is subjective and opens the door to arbitrary interpretation. This could lead to overzealous enforcement or, conversely, loopholes that allow harmful content to slip through.

Suggestion: Refine the definition to include specific criteria for what constitutes harm and distress, and clarify the standards for identifiability of individuals.

2. Prohibition:
While the prohibition section sets a clear stance, it's overly simplistic. There's no mention of international jurisdictional challenges, nor does it address the digital nature of the content which easily crosses borders.

Suggestion: Introduce clauses that deal with international cooperation on enforcement and the extradition of offenders across borders.

3. Preventive Measures:
The call for "technological and legal mechanisms" is too broad and unfocused. Without specifying what these mechanisms might look like or providing a framework for their development, it places an untenable burden on member states, particularly those with limited resources.

Suggestion: Provide examples of successful measures or establish a working group to develop standardized tools and practices.

4. Exceptions:
The exceptions clause is a minefield of ambiguity. The terms "legitimate purposes" and "strict legal oversight" are not defined, which could easily be exploited to justify nearly any use of deepfake technology.

Suggestion: Clearly define what constitutes "legitimate purposes" and outline the criteria for "strict legal oversight."

5. Support for Victims:
Encouraging support services is noble but insufficiently directive. Without mandates or funding mechanisms, this encouragement is unlikely to translate into action.

Suggestion: Include mandates for member states to allocate funding and resources for victim support services.

6. International Cooperation:
While advocating for international cooperation is essential, this section reads as wishful thinking without concrete steps or commitments from member states.

Suggestion: Propose the establishment of an international task force with the authority and funding to implement the resolution's goals.

Conclusion:
This draft resolution has noble intentions but is plagued by vagueness, lack of detail, and potential for misinterpretation. It requires substantial revision to ensure it is both enforceable and effective. In its current form, it risks being nothing more than a symbolic gesture with little real-world impact.

Remember, the devil is in the details. A resolution with the power to effect real change must be precise, actionable, and equipped with the mechanisms for its own implementation.

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2850
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:22 pm

Ooc: I think this is quite well-written, however I wonder how this would interact with GA #692?
Factbooks · 46x World Assembly Author · Festering Snakepit Wiki · WACampaign · GA Stat Effects Data

Posts in the WA forums are Ooc and unofficial, absent indication otherwise.
Please check out my roleplay thread The Battle of Glass Tears!
WA 101 Guides to GA authorship, campaigning, and more.

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:51 pm

The Ice States wrote:Ooc: I think this is quite well-written, however I wonder how this would interact with GA #692?

Revised with a new version to make this resolution distinct and complementary to #692
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7905
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Sat Feb 17, 2024 5:28 am

Ambassador Fortier stands to speak. “This legislation is one that this Delegation can approximately support, in terms of the aims thereof. Grammatically, it is missing ‘The General Assembly’ or similar at the start and ‘Hereby enacts the following:’ between the preamble and active clauses, but that is a minor error. With regards to the fourth clause, I believe that what ‘provisions’ these are should be clarified, ideally turning it into a more direct mandate on member-nations. It is also unclear as to whether the sixth clause is mandatory or merely encouraging.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
The Overmind
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:14 pm

Note: this proposal, by a measure of three different ChatGPT detectors, is primarily constructed from the output of ChatGPT, mixed with (per two of the three detectors) some human editing.
Free Palestine

Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights


Neuroscientist | Formerly Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13691
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sat Feb 17, 2024 5:27 pm

Coronavirus wrote:snip

Sweet mother of Richard Nixon. Never in a million days would I have thought that somebody would respond to a ChatGPT-generated proposal with ChatGPT-generated feedback.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Tigrisia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 192
Founded: Dec 22, 2023
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tigrisia » Sun Feb 18, 2024 6:44 am

The delegation of Tigrisia has several questions and comments on this draft.

First of all, does this proposed resolution target programs to create videos, images or voices or does it target the generated results of a deepfake AI or does it target both? Deepfakes are defined as "utilizing artificial intelligence", which makes it seem that the programs are targeted, however "Is crafted without the explicit consent" makes it seem to target the generated results. We recommend to rewrite Article 1 of this resolution to make it clearer.

Also, for many applications, no artificial intelligence is needed to make sufficiently good fakes to deceive an individual or a group. The regulation misses the opportunity to include these type of fakes.

We also recommend to redraft Article 5, as it does not need subparagraphs, making it more readable.

For the delegation of Tigrisia
Ambassador Thomas Salazar
Head of Mission

User avatar
Simone Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1807
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Simone Republic » Mon Feb 19, 2024 1:19 am

Tinhampton wrote:
Coronavirus wrote:snip

Sweet mother of Richard Nixon. Never in a million days would I have thought that somebody would respond to a ChatGPT-generated proposal with ChatGPT-generated feedback.


(IC)

"At a certain point we'd all be replaced by ChatGPT", says an ursine assistant.
All posts OOC. (He/him). I don't speak for TNP. IC the "white bear" (it) is for jokes only.

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:13 am

Tigrisia wrote:The delegation of Tigrisia has several questions and comments on this draft.

First of all, does this proposed resolution target programs to create videos, images or voices or does it target the generated results of a deepfake AI or does it target both? Deepfakes are defined as "utilizing artificial intelligence", which makes it seem that the programs are targeted, however "Is crafted without the explicit consent" makes it seem to target the generated results. We recommend to rewrite Article 1 of this resolution to make it clearer.

Also, for many applications, no artificial intelligence is needed to make sufficiently good fakes to deceive an individual or a group. The regulation misses the opportunity to include these type of fakes.

We also recommend to redraft Article 5, as it does not need subparagraphs, making it more readable.

For the delegation of Tigrisia
Ambassador Thomas Salazar
Head of Mission


The Blyskalian Delegation replies,

In response to your queries, we have revised Article 1 to clearly indicate that the resolution targets both the programs used to create synthetic media, such as videos, images, or voices, and the generated results themselves, whether they are produced by artificial intelligence or any digital means. This is to encompass a broader range of synthetic media, acknowledging your rightfully pointed out concern that not all deceptive content requires AI to be convincingly manufactured.

Regarding Article 5, your recommendation for simplification and improved readability has been incorporated by eliminating unnecessary subparagraphs, thus streamlining the content and enhancing its comprehensibility.

Thank you.
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:19 am

The Overmind wrote:Note: this proposal, by a measure of three different ChatGPT detectors, is primarily constructed from the output of ChatGPT, mixed with (per two of the three detectors) some human editing.

OOC Note: While I do understand your point regarding the proposal's structuring, (and I do admit that it was constructed with the help of AI) I'd like to put forth a different perspective as someone who also happens to be an expert in the tech IRL.

I'd argue that the quality of an argument or proposition doesn't strictly correlate to its author - human or machine. The content of the proposal, its arguments, and its potential for improving our collective nations are what truly matters. I'd argue that we should be debating the merit of the proposal's content, not the merit of the tool used to craft it.

To address the concern of AI fluency devaluing handmade proposals, I believe it's an exaggeration to fear the machine rather than appreciate its assistance to those of us (like myself), who might be experts in a field, but still find procedural, stylistic or linguistic tasks a bridge too far. Couldn't we use AI as a way to level the playing field and allow even those lacking specific linguistic skills a voice to create great resolutions?

At the end of the day, we're all here trying to facilitate better decision-making processes and create excellent proposals. I say, if the technology is available to help us, why not let it?
Last edited by Blyskalia on Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
The Overmind
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:28 pm

Blyskalia wrote:
The Overmind wrote:Note: this proposal, by a measure of three different ChatGPT detectors, is primarily constructed from the output of ChatGPT, mixed with (per two of the three detectors) some human editing.

OOC Note: While I do understand your point regarding the proposal's structuring, (and I do admit that it was constructed with the help of AI) I'd like to put forth a different perspective as someone who also happens to be an expert in the tech IRL.

I'd argue that the quality of an argument or proposition doesn't strictly correlate to its author - human or machine. The content of the proposal, its arguments, and its potential for improving our collective nations are what truly matters. I'd argue that we should be debating the merit of the proposal's content, not the merit of the tool used to craft it.

To address the concern of AI fluency devaluing handmade proposals, I believe it's an exaggeration to fear the machine rather than appreciate its assistance to those of us (like myself), who might be experts in a field, but still find procedural, stylistic or linguistic tasks a bridge too far. Couldn't we use AI as a way to level the playing field and allow even those lacking specific linguistic skills a voice to create great resolutions?

At the end of the day, we're all here trying to facilitate better decision-making processes and create excellent proposals. I say, if the technology is available to help us, why not let it?


Regardless of your personal feelings on it, you should be completely up front about the fact that you used ChatGPT to construct your proposal.
Free Palestine

Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights


Neuroscientist | Formerly Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Stella Nera
Diplomat
 
Posts: 598
Founded: Sep 05, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Stella Nera » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:32 pm

You lost me when you used the word ethics. As a nihilist I find this concept ridiculous, fully against. Use logic next time.
La Ferra Suprema Reigns Supreme over the vast lands of Stella Nera
A land where humanity is king, above god and devil alike. A blissful Utopia for Humanity, a horrible Dystopia for sentient robots.

Robots shouldn't have rights or citizenship;
Compromise on other non-human sapient entities is possible, with limitations, but not on these buckets of bolts. They should serve humanity and have absolutely no place in society other than as our servants. Think of the benefits of this. Plus, they would almost certainly overtake humanity if we gave them the chance, whether out of pure advanced abilities or malice, or worse, both. Think of humanity.

Humanity First!

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2850
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:34 pm

Blyskalia wrote:
The Overmind wrote:Note: this proposal, by a measure of three different ChatGPT detectors, is primarily constructed from the output of ChatGPT, mixed with (per two of the three detectors) some human editing.

OOC Note: While I do understand your point regarding the proposal's structuring, (and I do admit that it was constructed with the help of AI) I'd like to put forth a different perspective as someone who also happens to be an expert in the tech IRL.

I'd argue that the quality of an argument or proposition doesn't strictly correlate to its author - human or machine. The content of the proposal, its arguments, and its potential for improving our collective nations are what truly matters. I'd argue that we should be debating the merit of the proposal's content, not the merit of the tool used to craft it.

To address the concern of AI fluency devaluing handmade proposals, I believe it's an exaggeration to fear the machine rather than appreciate its assistance to those of us (like myself), who might be experts in a field, but still find procedural, stylistic or linguistic tasks a bridge too far. Couldn't we use AI as a way to level the playing field and allow even those lacking specific linguistic skills a voice to create great resolutions?

At the end of the day, we're all here trying to facilitate better decision-making processes and create excellent proposals. I say, if the technology is available to help us, why not let it?

The problem with using Chatgpt is that it is essentially plagiarism, although a form which is not addressed by site rules. It is problematic for the same reason that copying your proposal from a public-domain article is problematic. I largely reiterate what I had said a previous time this came up,

The Ice States wrote:...while I appreciate the author at least stating that the draft was sourced from Chatgpt, it is still very much plagiarism, even if not in the rules sense (an application of the rules I and others have disagreed with), to have Chatgpt or other like AI to contribute this substantively to a proposal.

...

Regarding why this is an issue, I would largely copy what I stated in a Moderation thread on the matter. The problem with such proposals is two-fold. Firstly, people writing "their" proposals simply by copying text generated by an AI, rather than authors writing the text themselves, fundamentally degrades the fun and engaging nature of the WA, as players no longer have to do any real work to write their proposals. However, more importantly, it represents persons taking credit for work which is not theirs. Players should not get badges or the clout from authorship for work they did not do. Submitting text from eg a Wikipedia article is (rightfully) considered plagiarism, both by the rules and the general game community; while the former ostensibly does not apply to Chatgpt-generated proposals, the latter certainly does and should.

I would strongly discourage the author from continuing AI use in proposals[.]
Factbooks · 46x World Assembly Author · Festering Snakepit Wiki · WACampaign · GA Stat Effects Data

Posts in the WA forums are Ooc and unofficial, absent indication otherwise.
Please check out my roleplay thread The Battle of Glass Tears!
WA 101 Guides to GA authorship, campaigning, and more.

User avatar
Stella Nera
Diplomat
 
Posts: 598
Founded: Sep 05, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Stella Nera » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:36 pm

Isn't it ironic that a draft proposal made to combat AI deepfake and plagiarism was generated by an AI generation software?
La Ferra Suprema Reigns Supreme over the vast lands of Stella Nera
A land where humanity is king, above god and devil alike. A blissful Utopia for Humanity, a horrible Dystopia for sentient robots.

Robots shouldn't have rights or citizenship;
Compromise on other non-human sapient entities is possible, with limitations, but not on these buckets of bolts. They should serve humanity and have absolutely no place in society other than as our servants. Think of the benefits of this. Plus, they would almost certainly overtake humanity if we gave them the chance, whether out of pure advanced abilities or malice, or worse, both. Think of humanity.

Humanity First!

User avatar
The Overmind
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:41 pm

Blyskalia wrote: -snip-


I also just want to note the absurdity that Tinhampton pointed out: do we really want this chamber to turn into AI-written proposals getting AI-written feedback? At that point, what are we even doing here?
Last edited by The Overmind on Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free Palestine

Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights


Neuroscientist | Formerly Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Stella Nera
Diplomat
 
Posts: 598
Founded: Sep 05, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Stella Nera » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:43 pm

The Overmind wrote:
Blyskalia wrote: -snip-


I also just want to note the absurdity that Timhampton pointed out: do we really want this chamber to turn into AI-written proposals getting AI-written feedback? At that point, what are we even doing here?


Wow I actually agree with you for once yeah AI has no place in NationStates.
La Ferra Suprema Reigns Supreme over the vast lands of Stella Nera
A land where humanity is king, above god and devil alike. A blissful Utopia for Humanity, a horrible Dystopia for sentient robots.

Robots shouldn't have rights or citizenship;
Compromise on other non-human sapient entities is possible, with limitations, but not on these buckets of bolts. They should serve humanity and have absolutely no place in society other than as our servants. Think of the benefits of this. Plus, they would almost certainly overtake humanity if we gave them the chance, whether out of pure advanced abilities or malice, or worse, both. Think of humanity.

Humanity First!

User avatar
The Overmind
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:44 pm

Stella Nera wrote:
The Overmind wrote:
I also just want to note the absurdity that Timhampton pointed out: do we really want this chamber to turn into AI-written proposals getting AI-written feedback? At that point, what are we even doing here?


Wow I actually agree with you for once yeah AI has no place in NationStates.


We're talking OOC, and about LLM-produced content, and not IC sapient AI to be clear.
Last edited by The Overmind on Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Free Palestine

Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights


Neuroscientist | Formerly Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:55 pm

OOC Note: Thank you all for sparking such a fascinating conversation regarding AI and its place in our community. Allow me to try and bridge these differing views on the basis of appreciation for both sides of the coin.

The Overmind, your point about fully disclosing the use of AI tools like ChatGPT is well-received. Transparency indeed nurtures trust.

The Ice States, I agree it's crucial that we not take undue credit for work not ours. But I want to highlight that in this case, the LLM-based writing, was not just about generating text from thin air. A significant amount of data, extensive training, and human input goes into building a model, and in this case, I actually fine-tuned a model by hand to help me with writing MECE definitions and handling legalese. The model was trained on content that I produced myself, and the work that went into bringing that to fruition far exceeds the normal procedural task of drafting a resolution.

Stella Nera, you're definitely not off the mark there - it's ironic that an AI tool was used in a proposal discussing AI ethics, but I hope you see it underlines the breadth and variety of uses such AI tools can offer. It's not just about crafting proposals, it’s also about advancing conversations around complex, nuanced issues like AI's societal impacts.

In response to your shared concern about AI-written proposals and feedback, I sympathize with you all. This space is cherished for its intellectual engagement and the rich dialogues between human minds. Replacing that with AI-generated banter would indeed rob us of the very essence we uphold.

Yet, I argue that this usage of AI is not in the direction of replacing, but on aiding and abetting us in achieving that richness. AI tools can compensate for areas we humans might struggle with, without stripping away the human touch, the flair, and the essence of our debates.

This is all to say, dismissing AI out of hand as inappropriate for NationStates limits our ability to grow as a community. Our rules need to account not just for the world today, but also for the future - a future where AI will be a part of day-to-day life as surely as the internet is now.
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2850
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:02 pm

Blyskalia wrote:The Ice States, I agree it's crucial that we not take undue credit for work not ours. But I want to highlight that in this case, the LLM-based writing, was not just about generating text from thin air. A significant amount of data, extensive training, and human input goes into building a model, and in this case, I actually fine-tuned a model by hand to help me with writing MECE definitions and handling legalese. The model was trained on content that I produced myself, and the work that went into bringing that to fruition far exceeds the normal procedural task of drafting a resolution.

In that case, why didn't you just write the resolution yourself?
Factbooks · 46x World Assembly Author · Festering Snakepit Wiki · WACampaign · GA Stat Effects Data

Posts in the WA forums are Ooc and unofficial, absent indication otherwise.
Please check out my roleplay thread The Battle of Glass Tears!
WA 101 Guides to GA authorship, campaigning, and more.

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:55 am

The Ice States wrote:In that case, why didn't you just write the resolution yourself?

In response to your pointed question, Ice States - you're absolutely right. In retrospect, it would have been easier and arguably more in line with the spirit of this community to just write the resolution myself.

I genuinely apologize for the uneasiness and confusion my method has caused. I was honestly unaware of past precedents against using AI to aid in resolution writing. I was focused solely on the abilities of these AI tools and how they could supplement the process, rather than seeing them as a potential threat to the human essence and spirit of our debates. Your points have forced me to rethink my perspective, and I'm grateful for it.

This discussion has made it clear that the most pressing silent enemy that could fundamentally disrupt the framework of our engagements is AI.
Last edited by Blyskalia on Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:21 am, edited 4 times in total.
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:24 am

@All I am going to undertake a manual re-write of this resolution from scratch. I'll be making a new thread to house the re-write considering the direction that the discourse has taken here, and to ensure that we can start off from a clean slate.

Ty all for the input and opportunity to learn.
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22864
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Wed Feb 21, 2024 2:19 pm

The amount of AI bullshit in this thread amounts to botspam.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
The Overmind
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:07 pm

I see you changed the title of this tagline of the thread from "[Draft]" to "[CLOSED]". If you want this thread actually locked, you will need to make a request over at Moderation.

Edit: not a mod
Last edited by The Overmind on Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free Palestine

Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights


Neuroscientist | Formerly Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Blyskalia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Sep 07, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Blyskalia » Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:08 pm

The Overmind wrote:I see you changed the title of this tagline of the thread from "[Draft]" to "[CLOSED]". If you want this thread actually locked, you will need to make a request over at Moderation.

Edit: not a mod

Appreciate it, will do
  • My History (to the best of my recollection)
    DEN: January 2015 until the Fall of DEN on April 2nd, 2016
    HYDRA Command & The Invaders: April 2016 until late 2017
    Various Bumping Around & The Black Hawks: 2017 until mid-2018
    Main Hiatus: mid-2018 until late 2020
    The North Pacific: Late 2020 to the Present Day serving as Deputy Speaker


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bananaistan, Dauchh Palki, FlyLands, ImperialRussia, Imperium Anglorum, Kenmoria, San Dogs

Advertisement

Remove ads