by Sedgistan » Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:15 am
by Tinhampton » Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:23 am
by Sherpus » Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:26 am
by Second Sovereignty » Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:30 am
Sherpus wrote:I agree with this, I never really understood the concept of GA and it’s working so a little remix or just straight up removal of the idea would be amazing.
by Desmosthenes and Burke » Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:26 am
by The Ice States » Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:30 am
by Verdant Haven » Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:34 pm
Tinhampton wrote:If I may ask, though:
1: Is it foreseen that editors will code stats for all submitted proposals, or only those at vote/with a serious chance of going to vote?
2a: How far will Optionality apply in the new regime? Can I still submit a proposal that only encourages member states to do XYZ rather than introducing a mandate, as is currently appropriate for Mild-strength proposals?
2b: Will the Committees and Operative Clause rules apply as normal in the new regime?
Second Sovereignty wrote:A key question, though; would this change involve stripping the Categories off of all already passed Legislation?
by Minoa » Sun Feb 04, 2024 3:10 pm
by West Barack and East Obama » Sun Feb 04, 2024 3:33 pm
by Desmosthenes and Burke » Sun Feb 04, 2024 3:46 pm
Minoa wrote:What do the developers think about the idea of allowing the GA Secretariat to code the stats too, thereby reducing the potential extra workload on the Issues Editors?
by United Calanworie » Sun Feb 04, 2024 4:23 pm
Minoa wrote:What do the developers think about the idea of allowing the GA Secretariat to code the stats too, thereby reducing the potential extra workload on the Issues Editors?
by Verdant Haven » Sun Feb 04, 2024 4:25 pm
Minoa wrote:What do the developers think about the idea of allowing the GA Secretariat to code the stats too, thereby reducing the potential extra workload on the Issues Editors?
West Barack and East Obama wrote:What changes were made that made this feasible to implement compared to the preceding years?
by Kranostav » Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:48 pm
by Warzone Codger » Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:49 pm
by The Ice States » Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:50 pm
by Ankuran » Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:57 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Does the IE team have the capacity (and confident of ongoing future capacity) to update stats as each resolution is passed or would we expect a lag, with a TG when our nation is actually brought into compliance.
<WARNING!!> Sleep [ ▋▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ]<CRITICAL!!> F7 [ ▋▋▋▋▋▋▋▋▋▋]
☭ Strength Through Unity | La force via l'union ☭
███████████████████████
United Calanworie wrote:You can fucking swear as much as you fucking want to on these goddamn fucking forums as long as you don't fucking swear at other people, like calling them a little bitch or an asshole. Hell, you can even swear while posting about those goddamn fucking politicians over in Washington and how they're all a bunch of fucking thieves who are stealing your goddamn hard earned money.
by Noahs Second Country » Sun Feb 04, 2024 6:20 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Does the IE team have the capacity (and confident of ongoing future capacity) to update stats as each resolution is passed or would we expect a lag, with a TG when our nation is actually brought into compliance.
I thought this idea was DOA because of the inevitable backlog it'll create.
Verdant Haven wrote: At this point, the IE team is well-established, has sufficient internal processes and procedures, and has a proven track-record sufficient to garner the confidence of the relevant admin staff that we will reliably handle the job.
by Trotterdam » Sun Feb 04, 2024 6:33 pm
by IMPROPER CLASSIFICATIONS » Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:05 pm
by Kostane » Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:20 pm
were doomed arent we? | God save us all
by Luna Amore » Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:34 pm
Noahs Second Country wrote:systems will be in place backstage to ensure that this never happens, and if it does there is a clear plan to address it.
by SherpDaWerp » Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:15 pm
Trotterdam wrote:Does this mean that GA resolutions will have the same stat secrecy issues do, with players only being able to guess at what the stat effects might be until they actually happen, and authors only being able to hope that the editors won't interpret their resolutions completely differently from their intent?
Trotterdam wrote:Also, does this mean the GA will be able to start affecting actual binary policies (banning Child Self-Rearing, say) rather than just numerical stats? And how would that work when the language of the issue implies that the ruling is supposed to be permanent, rather than "everyone gets Child Self-Rearing stripped away when this resolution passes but you can reintroduce it later with no problems"?
Luna Amore wrote:Noahs Second Country wrote:systems will be in place backstage to ensure that this never happens, and if it does there is a clear plan to address it.
This reads like a line from an issue
What fail-safes does the staff have in mind? From what I recall last time it was discussed, that was a seemingly impassable hurdle since retroactively applying resolutions stats would be both annoying technically and confusing from a player perspective. Stats would be coded in the 4 day voting period (plus possibility a bit extra as it was clear it would go to vote), so a concrete Plan B would seem critical.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement