NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Consequences Schmonsequences

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Consequences Schmonsequences

Postby Cretox State » Sat Jun 10, 2023 5:11 pm

Is the validity feasible to code?
Consequences Schmonsequences

Validity: 206.3, WMD sales policy flag, not autarky, nuclear power.

Description
Your government's made a killing charging other nations to build nuclear power plants in @@NAME@@, charging them even more to dispose of the waste from those plants, and then discreetly selling the waste to very respectable third parties in no way affiliated with international terrorist organizations. However, foreign inspectors have increasingly been sniffing around the plants, and your third party contacts have started making themselves scarce.

Option 1
"It's game over, man! Game over!" squeals strategic advisor @@RANDOMNAME@@, before realizing that the Foreign Minister of the United Federation is still in the room after an earlier meeting to discuss ongoing counterterrorism operations. "Uhh… this cabinet @@ANIMAL@@ball game is definitely over. Because the other team's onto us. So let's cash in and take the goals we have while we're still ahead, even if we can't keep scoring touchdowns with the infield puck before our tee time runs out."

Effect: terrorist groups collapsing as the deficit increases is taught to students as an example of correlation not implying causation

Option 2
"I think we can still have our cake and eat it too," says 'international agricultural consultant' @@RANDOMNAME@@, nervously glancing at the Foreign Minister as he surreptitiously turns on a recording device. "There are plenty of mouths who want to eat, and we can sandwich our options with additional layers to throw the regulators off our scent. It'll cut into our slice of the pie, but this way we can keep our meat and potatoes going while the rest of them keep drinking the kool-aid."

Effect: the government's shady dealings are funneled through dozens of actual laundromats

Option 3
"Sorry ta' interrupt, but can we talk 'bout them nook-yoo-lar deals y'all been doing?" asks the Foreign Minister, covering up his recorder with a copy of the United Federation constitution. "We took one look at yer work and thought 'hey, that's just the sorta thang we do!' Tell ya what. You sign an exclusive 'construction' contract with us, an' we keep them regulatory folks off yer backs an' cut you in on a tidy share of the profits. Whaddaya say, pardner?"

Effect: @@LEADER@@'s staffers are paid in foreign currency and barbeque sauce
Last edited by Cretox State on Sun Jun 11, 2023 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Sat Jun 10, 2023 6:14 pm

Reserved.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Verdant Haven
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 2268
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Verdant Haven » Sat Jun 10, 2023 6:25 pm

Re: the validity:

Coding for a nuclear-powered non-autarky is easily done, but the other bits are a challenge. If I'm not mistaken, having multiple specific responses required which are not otherwise in issues tied to each other is something that would typically require policy flags tied to those specific options. While we can track the selling of potential WMD materials to other nations as occurs in 542.4, that isn't the only issue or option out there to involve that activity, so that by itself wouldn't be usable with the specificity we see in this draft. Option 206.3 doesn't reflect anything uniquely trackable at this time, so would also be a challenge. We are able to make an issue immediately follow a specific option choice, but I'm not aware of a way to set a validity that is based on simply having chosen a given group of options at some point in the past.
- Verdant Haven

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Sat Jun 10, 2023 6:29 pm

Verdant Haven wrote:Coding for a nuclear-powered non-autarky is easily done, but the other bits are a challenge. If I'm not mistaken, having multiple specific responses required which are not otherwise in issues tied to each other is something that would typically require policy flags tied to those specific options. While we can track the selling of potential WMD materials to other nations as occurs in 542.4, that isn't the only issue or option out there to involve that activity, so that by itself wouldn't be usable with the specificity we see in this draft. Option 206.3 doesn't reflect anything uniquely trackable at this time, so would also be a challenge. We are able to make an issue immediately follow a specific option choice, but I'm not aware of a way to set a validity that is based on simply having chosen a given group of options at some point in the past.

Would it be possible to have an issue follow 206.3 provided the nation has the policy flag for selling WMD materials instead of 542.4?
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Verdant Haven
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 2268
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Verdant Haven » Sat Jun 10, 2023 7:11 pm

Cretox State wrote:Would it be possible to have an issue follow 206.3 provided the nation has the policy flag for selling WMD materials instead of 542.4?

I believe we would be able to make that work, yes. Might be a bit of a bodge, but doable.
- Verdant Haven

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Sat Jun 10, 2023 7:18 pm

Verdant Haven wrote:
Cretox State wrote:Would it be possible to have an issue follow 206.3 provided the nation has the policy flag for selling WMD materials instead of 542.4?

I believe we would be able to make that work, yes. Might be a bit of a bodge, but doable.

Gotcha. Always really interesting to get a glimpse of what goes on behind the scenes.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.


Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads