World Assembly,
RECONGIZING the intentions of the mentioned resolution to be flawed and against the notion of member nation's rights,
UNDERSTANDING that this issue is best reserved for an nation-to-nation issue for the following reasons;
A. Each member nation has their own complex legal, cultural, and historical contexts that shape an different view on slavery and trafficking,
B. Reserving this issue for nations would respect their perspective on slavery and trafficking, building trust within the community
C. Stating that the mentioned resolution infringes upon the rights of member nations, prohibiting them from acting within their own social contexts for an undefined term of "human rights"
D. Statin that this mentioned resolution puts on an "one-size-fits-all" regulation on member nations, disregarding the fundamental ideas of respecting other cultures and legal systems
NOTING that ethical questions are raised about the idea of slavery
HOPING to help address these ethical concerns,
A. Having someone do unpaid labor where they can not leave, although seeming morally ambiguous, is not in itself wrong. This labor can be anything from picking cotton, to mining, to washing clothes, practices which have been improved and have been safer over the years
B. With the labor being safe, there is no apparent reason to worry for the person's safety/well being, and as such, the person can be considered in safe hands
C. Although not being able to leave work that might not want to do seems daunting, it is extremely common for many people, such as having to do house duties, cleaning an car, etc
D. Comparing house duties to the labor mentioned might seem wrong, it is important to understand that both practices are perfectly safe, if under right conditions, and as such can be considered equal in some contexts.
HEREBY,
I. Repeals GA#23 "Ban on Slavery and Trafficking"
this is just an small draft, will be expanded upon every day
