So, Mail in voting. A huge topic, especially during election years If your registered and have access to a postal service, you get sent a ballot. Sign on what you want to vote for and mail it back. Pretty simple. This practice has been set up in an almost all mail in voting practice in 7 US states, with Vermont adopting it in general elections and DC might adopt it in the future, though 4 states has restricted mail-in voting. Outside the United States, Germany, Canada, Poland, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Lichtenstein and Austria had adopted mail-in voting on demand with many more adopting it in some form.
Mail-in voting has several advantages against in-person voting. Advantages, for example simpler, more convenient voting, waiting less time to vote for a candidate, helping with increases in voting turnout, and in Colorado where Mail-In voting was introduced, deters more extremists, participation, and an survey of 1,500 Coloradoans, most reported that they were satisfied with the voting practice and it showed that Mail-In voting in Colorado actually saved money. On the other hand, ballots could be discarded or damaged before they can be counted intentionally, less accessible to communities without mailboxes, complications with deadlines are there, and it can be confusing, for example assuming if your vote will be counted, or if you might request it.
So, do you think that we should adopt mail-in voting? Personally, yes, I think we should adopt mail in voting. Voting should be free and fair, and should be convenient to the voter, with little pressure on them, and should be a quick ballot in and go. Some of the benefits of mail-in voting could be in dire need (depends on location) and could help to yield more free and fair elections.
