by Millenhaal » Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:24 pm
by Millenhaal » Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:25 pm
by Untecna » Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:26 pm
Untecna wrote:No, and you can talk to my dragon lawyers if you dragon want me to dragon shut up.
Hemakral wrote:damn bro that wall so thick kool-aid man couldn't bust through
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Hispida wrote:"dude, you nuked us off the map"
"ok, well, you're the one who fucked with poland's tractor"
by Verdant Haven » Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:44 am
by Trotterdam » Sat Mar 11, 2023 11:10 am
by Millenhaal » Sat Mar 11, 2023 12:56 pm
Verdant Haven wrote:This is a well-written issue with potential. The name is fantastic.
I think the biggest challenge right now is that despite the specificity of then initiating dilemma (the presence of dangerous substances in a love potion), the options end up feeling a bit like a rather broad "alternative medicine vs traditional medicine" debate, which has been done.
I would love to see this written from the perspective of if potions are just considered normal. For example, there are a surprising number of nations that utilize soothsayers and fortunetellers in an official government capacity. We can also look at the even larger number of nations that have a significant proportion of "new age beliefs" in their population. If this weren't a matter of "potions are hogwash, let's discuss whether they are allowed to exist" and instead was about "potions obviously work, so let's make sure they're safe and effective," I think that could be a new and fun way to look at it that allows you to get even deeper into the topic. Government "potion and crystal safety inspectors," written as entirely serious and secular entities, could be hilarious.
by New Stonen » Sat Mar 11, 2023 1:00 pm
by Verdant Haven » Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:08 pm
Millenhaal wrote:I love this, but I have a question. How would the validities work for such a thing?
by Millenhaal » Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:09 pm
Verdant Haven wrote:Millenhaal wrote:I love this, but I have a question. How would the validities work for such a thing?
Depends which of those conditions you want, but basically you can write the validity as something like "Nation has significant new age beliefs" and we can get that sorted for you backstage.
by Australian rePublic » Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:41 pm
by Millenhaal » Sun Mar 19, 2023 5:04 pm
by Millenhaal » Fri Mar 24, 2023 11:46 am
by New Anarchisticstan » Fri Mar 24, 2023 11:49 am
by Sheizou » Fri Mar 24, 2023 11:56 am
Nation: sheizou
tier: 5
type: 5
class: 2.2
by The Grand Fifth Imperium » Fri Mar 24, 2023 1:56 pm
Y'know, you're looking a little drab in the facial area. Would you consider purchasing some Martha May makeup? It'd really spice up your look!"
by Millenhaal » Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:34 pm
New Anarchisticstan wrote:lmao purgatory
The Grand Fifth Imperium wrote:Y'know, you're looking a little drab in the facial area. Would you consider purchasing some Martha May makeup? It'd really spice up your look!"
is it just me or does that last couple of sentences seem a little out of place in option 5? im guessing its put in for humour, but i must admit that its sorta gone over my head
by Urine Town » Sun Mar 26, 2023 1:45 pm
by The Grand Fifth Imperium » Sun Mar 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Urine Town wrote:It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking too far outside the box with making issues, to the point where they are hardly related to your description. And believe me, I’ve been there while making them on my alt nations. For that reason, I would get rid of option 4, since it seems to transition from questionable chemical compounds (that are within modern scientific ability), into magic from Harry Potter. I hope that’s fine
by Verdant Haven » Mon Mar 27, 2023 7:16 am
The Grand Fifth Imperium wrote:Urine Town wrote:It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking too far outside the box with making issues, to the point where they are hardly related to your description. And believe me, I’ve been there while making them on my alt nations. For that reason, I would get rid of option 4, since it seems to transition from questionable chemical compounds (that are within modern scientific ability), into magic from Harry Potter. I hope that’s fine
not necessarily... remember the age-changing issue? in the last option Leader's niece? wanted him to legally turn her into a unicorn
by The Grand Fifth Imperium » Mon Mar 27, 2023 8:21 am
Verdant Haven wrote:The Grand Fifth Imperium wrote:
not necessarily... remember the age-changing issue? in the last option Leader's niece? wanted him to legally turn her into a unicorn
Not legally turn her into that - legally declare that on a piece of paper. No actual change occurred, any more than the person's actual age would have changed. Legal identity is separate from the concept of magic.
by Millenhaal » Thu Mar 30, 2023 4:43 pm
by Millenhaal » Wed Apr 05, 2023 10:38 am
by Verdant Haven » Sun Apr 09, 2023 7:17 am
by Millenhaal » Wed Apr 12, 2023 5:19 pm
by Millenhaal » Wed Apr 19, 2023 2:33 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Edush, Sagrea, Trotterdam, Verdant Haven, We use slave
Advertisement