The Security Council,
The Security Council is a place to debate ideas in international politics and it’s about time it addresses the Commendation of Europeia for it’s REPEAL, which in my point of view is no longer necessary for Commendation, as it has lost its validity; it no longer applies to the circumstances that currently surround and dominate Europeia.
The Commendation says Europeia and King HEM to be democratic and democratic values champions, although it's not the case.
King HEM has also made profund mistakes during their career that need to be reviewed by this Security Council. Circumstances of making decisions that affect stability; the sense of equality and justice; in the end bad decisions that have been detrimental to freedoms, democracy, good sense and that set a strong precedent of ignorance about mental health.
For years, King HEM and Europeia, have claimed to be a safe region for those suffering from mental illness, however, this is not the case in reality. There have been unfair procedures, in which ignorance has dominated, that have ended in institutional decisions, which turn this "democratic" region that promotes "equality values" and claims to be a “safe region for those suffering from mental health issues” into a region that discriminates people with mental health issues. What’s not worst, the one’s making this decisions, have not been elected by the citizens to make those decisions. Proving that it is a region with institutions of course, but they are facade institutions, because those who are really making institutional decisions are a handful of officials without a popular mandate. No democracy involved and no elections involved.
King HEM has made quite a few errors in judgment, which can serve as evidence, that he is a very flawed character that has lost the values he claims to defend, like Democratic values, that were commended by resolution of this Security Council.
The Resolution Commending Europeia claims that Europeia was first a Monarchy, it clearly says that it is no longer one, and that instead, it is a democracy and that because it is a democracy and proclaims to promote democratic values, it must be commended. However, Europeia today is no longer a democracy. Today it is a region that strongly lacks democratic values.
As I have argued, there are a handful of officials appointed by hand, who do not go through the polls or public scrutiny, and who make deep decisions about the region. Which leaves the officials who have been elected, without a voice or vote, without any power of decision, on this body of a handful of people chosen by hand, by King HEM and others of his choosing.
This is evidence that although the region is not officially recognized as a monarchy, it is true that King HEM has unlimited power and leadership over institutional decisions. Which shows that this regime that dominates the region is not democratic.
In the best of cases, Europeia is a hybrid regime, between democracy and dictatorship. It has indeed a Senate, were the citizens choose their Senators; it has indeed a president, elected by the citizens. But there are overtones of dictatorship, strongly rooted in the figure of King HEM, who under the figure of founder, has managed to monopolize many of the institutional and heavy decisions in that region. Which are not democratic. Who chose King HEM to have this ilimited role of founder-administrator? He is a figure from decades ago who still dominates that region as if he were a King.
King HEM is not an irrelevant figure without any power, he is a founder who after decades continues to hand-pick people on his committee to control many important decisions in Europeia.
King HEM does not allow values to prevail democratic leadership rotation. His leadership has been prevailing in that region for decades, which somehow shows a perpetuation of a status quo, where what he wants prevails.
Respected Council, respected dignitaries from many regions, democracy cannot be a facade for a king to make the decisions he wants with a committee that he has chosen himself, and that is not accountable to anyone, as if it were in a true democracy.
True democracies do not have leaders who have spent decades exercising so much power, or holding positions that allow them to remain actively involved in institutional decisions, or empowering committees that they themselves elect to make far-reaching decisions.
In a democracy, high-power positions must be rotated, not exercised by the same figure for decades, who, in addition to his influence, imposes decisions of an institutional nature.
The resolutions of the security council on the promotion of democratic values must be in accordance with the values, principles, and real convictions of a true democracy.
Let's begin this discussion, from which a triumphant resolution will emerge, repealing the recommendation to Europeia, for sustaining inaccuracies and misrepresenting the truth.
