by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:19 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:21 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:24 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Aww, did someone’s massive ego get bruised when they got booted from Islamic States?
In terms of the draft; different day, same old shit.
by Barlyy » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:32 am
by The Hurricane » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:36 am
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:58 am
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:35 am
Wayneactia wrote:Why do I foresee NN being banned from creating threads on The League?
The Hurricane wrote:So you were banjected 27 minutes ago/and this thread was made 12 minutes ago.. this proposal (at max) took 15 minutes to make. Against.
by Ministry Of Defense » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:39 am
Barlyy wrote:I'd support this if Thneedville was better decorated as a region (flag, banner, etc) but it looks soooooo bland. Like, who'd condemn the League for taking credit from such a boooring region? Get a good flag and banner, maybe give some color to the WFE, and then I might change my opinion in the future.
Against.
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:03 am
Ministry Of Defense wrote:Barlyy wrote:I'd support this if Thneedville was better decorated as a region (flag, banner, etc) but it looks soooooo bland. Like, who'd condemn the League for taking credit from such a boooring region? Get a good flag and banner, maybe give some color to the WFE, and then I might change my opinion in the future.
Against.
I agree with you.Even the WFE makes it look unattractive.
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:22 am
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:18 am
by Rusticus I Damianus » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:23 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:33 am
Rusticus I Damianus wrote:Condemn The League? Sure. With this? Nope.
Not even going to say if I'm in favor or against, cause I know it's not going to make it to vote.
by New Anarchisticstan » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:35 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:37 am
New Anarchisticstan wrote:Condemn a defender region? Really? I get it you have a grudge, but I sure am against this proposal.
by Zanderlock » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:38 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:The Security Council,
HORRIFIED by The League’s interference in the ongoing liberation of Islamic States,
BELIEVING that it was totally wrong for them to attack forces with the same goals who had shown up first, possibly because The League were motivated more by glory-seeking than anything else,
RECOGNISING Thneedville forces, led by Nationalist Northumbria, as being the true coalition of the willing and deserving the credit,
CONSIDERING that The League are no better than the raiders they evidently falsely claim to oppose,
ADDING to this their record of using the Security Council to commend undeserving nominees just because they are from their region,
Hereby condemns The League.
by Rusticus I Damianus » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:39 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:40 am
Rusticus I Damianus wrote:Nationalist Northumbria wrote:What don’t you like about it?
It's not well written. I'd recommend looking at other condemnations, specifically successful ones, seeing how they're written, and also doing more research on The League to find more reasons to condemn them beyond just them raiding Islamic States.
by Ministry Of Defense » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:41 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Ministry Of Defense wrote:I agree with you.Even the WFE makes it look unattractive.
Well, glad as I am to have the disapproval of the Russian Armed Forces, personally I do not feel that Thneedville's WFE needs more pastel colours than a 9-year-old girl's diary for the region to not be boring. Our name and theme is more than enough.
by Rusticus I Damianus » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:44 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Rusticus I Damianus wrote:It's not well written. I'd recommend looking at other condemnations, specifically successful ones, seeing how they're written, and also doing more research on The League to find more reasons to condemn them beyond just them raiding Islamic States.
I’m not proposing to condemn them for raiding Islamic States, though. Please don’t criticise my proposal without having actually read it.
by Istastioner » Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:54 am
by Lile Ulie Islands » Mon Jan 16, 2023 7:05 am
by Witchcraft and Sorcery » Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:02 pm
by Neutraligon » Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:36 pm
by Dawn Denac » Tue Jan 17, 2023 12:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement