by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:15 pm
by The Ice States » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:16 pm
by Veneti Marsei » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:17 pm
by Floofybit » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:18 pm
by 800 » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:23 pm
Atlantic Isles wrote:The Security Council,
Noting with disgust numerous low-effort resolution submissions by Mynation,
Concerned that these resolutions are a contradiction of the high standard to which WA proposals ought to be held,
Disappointed in Mynation's blatant and shameless badge-chasing,
Alarmed that allowing these idly-wrought resolutions to be submitted without condemnation may render the World Assembly impotent,
Certain that allowing Mynation to sustain no punishment will set a precedent for low-effort resolutions and proposals to continue,
Hereby condemns Mynation
-----
I'd like feedback on this ASAP to get this in the queue. Hoping to submit within a few hours of now, so any feedback would be appreciated.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:24 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:25 pm
by Kainin » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:25 pm
by 800 » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:26 pm
Atlantic Isles wrote:Alright, your feedback is received. I've revised this a bit so my logic is a bit clearer.
-----
The Security Council,
Noting with disgust numerous low-effort resolution submissions by Mynation,
Concerned that these resolutions are a contradiction of the high standard to which World Assembly proposals ought to be held,
Believing that World Assembly resolutions and proposals should be carefully written and deliberately revised,
Recognizing that instead Mynation has created a set of resolutions which serve no true purpose but rather clog up the World Assembly,
Aware that more useful resolutions are in the queue,
Seeing that creating such low-effort resolutions delays voting upon more crucial work,
Alarmed that allowing these idly-wrought resolutions to be submitted without condemnation may render the World Assembly impotent,
Certain that allowing Mynation to sustain no punishment will set a precedent for low-effort resolutions and proposals to continue,
Hereby condemns Mynation
by The Ice States » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:26 pm
by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:28 pm
800 wrote:Atlantic Isles wrote:The Security Council,
Noting with disgust numerous low-effort resolution submissions by Mynation,
Concerned that these resolutions are a contradiction of the high standard to which WA proposals ought to be held,
Disappointed in Mynation's blatant and shameless badge-chasing,
Alarmed that allowing these idly-wrought resolutions to be submitted without condemnation may render the World Assembly impotent,
Certain that allowing Mynation to sustain no punishment will set a precedent for low-effort resolutions and proposals to continue,
Hereby condemns Mynation
-----
I'd like feedback on this ASAP to get this in the queue. Hoping to submit within a few hours of now, so any feedback would be appreciated.
Uhm, no, no, a condemnation would be the holy grail for any badge hunter.
by 800 » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:30 pm
Atlantic Isles wrote:800 wrote:
Uhm, no, no, a condemnation would be the holy grail for any badge hunter.
I would argue that condemnations are a mark of shame, and personally I would work to avoid one rather than to receive one even as a badge hunter. Don't get me wrong, I see what you're getting at, but I just think that even as a badge hunter that would be something to be avoided. It's beyond badgehunting, too, it's about gumming up the WA and delaying other votes.
by Giovanniland » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:30 pm
Atlantic Isles wrote:I would argue that condemnations are a mark of shame
by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:33 pm
by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:36 pm
by Zanderlock » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:38 pm
by Giovanniland » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:39 pm
by Floofybit » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:42 pm
Zanderlock wrote:I AM SO TIRED OF SEEING THESE LOW-EFFORT WA PROPOSALS. 100% FOR.
by Atlantic Isles » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:43 pm
Giovanniland wrote:Atlantic Isles wrote:Well, every time I've seen a nation be condemned it's for doing something that makes them highly unpopular or just generally playing poorly. Seems like this situation fits both of those descriptors pretty well.
Nope. Almost every condemnation in the SC's history (barring a few attempts in its early history, which had the intention of shaming until people realized it only made them happier) has been in order to recognize someone for 'playing the villain' well, much like commendations are an award for excelling at good things.
by Free Algerstonia » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:47 pm
Giovanniland wrote:Atlantic Isles wrote:Well, every time I've seen a nation be condemned it's for doing something that makes them highly unpopular or just generally playing poorly. Seems like this situation fits both of those descriptors pretty well.
Nope. Almost every condemnation in the SC's history (barring a few attempts in its early history, which had the intention of shaming until people realized it only made the nominee happier) has been in order to recognize someone for 'playing the villain' well, much like commendations are an award for excelling at good things. Essentially both are badges of honor for different things.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Dec 07, 2022 2:49 pm
Free Algerstonia wrote:Giovanniland wrote:Nope. Almost every condemnation in the SC's history (barring a few attempts in its early history, which had the intention of shaming until people realized it only made the nominee happier) has been in order to recognize someone for 'playing the villain' well, much like commendations are an award for excelling at good things. Essentially both are badges of honor for different things.
one author clogging up both world assembly chambers for three days is not villainous?
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Outer Sparta » Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:33 pm
Free Algerstonia wrote:Giovanniland wrote:Nope. Almost every condemnation in the SC's history (barring a few attempts in its early history, which had the intention of shaming until people realized it only made the nominee happier) has been in order to recognize someone for 'playing the villain' well, much like commendations are an award for excelling at good things. Essentially both are badges of honor for different things.
one author clogging up both world assembly chambers for three days is not villainous?
by Free Algerstonia » Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:36 pm
by Outer Sparta » Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:40 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement