Advertisement
by Numero Capitan » Thu Dec 01, 2022 12:14 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Thu Dec 01, 2022 12:36 pm
Numero Capitan wrote:Taunting the SC for allowing you to inadvertently remove a fascist anti-WA founder is a weird flex but I guess it’s all you’ve got right now
Numero Capitan wrote:Why is that since BoM came back there's been an endless cycle of raiders weaponising problematic OOC matters for IC gain? (and some who seem repeatedly incapable of understanding why its a problem)
Those on their side who have been around for better eras of raiderdom should also be doing more to call it out too...
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by WayNeacTia » Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:02 pm
Numero Capitan wrote:Taunting the SC for allowing you to inadvertently remove a fascist anti-WA founder is a weird flex but I guess it’s all you’ve got right now
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]
Advertisement