Imperial Anglo-Saxony wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Losing the Wakefield by election by a wide margin therefore means nothing? Losing several strongholds in local elections should be dismissed?
Yes because maybe 10% of people vote in locals? I won't deign to besmirch the good name of labour voters, but they do have a bit more spare time if you know what I mean.
Im not sure if this crosses the line or not into trolling but i thought i would report it anyway just in case. The above user, who is relatively new as well, is basically implying Labour supporters are unemployed and thus capable of showing out for by-elections and local elections at a higher turnout than supporters of other UK political parties. If its not actionable no worries but it seems fishy to me for a newish user to make such stereotypical comments of supporters of a political party and that it could be intended to get a rise out of people or a sly way of trying to get around the rules
