[R] Flaming

[Attack Helicopter]

Not a good attempt, full of filler, and don't have a good grasp on the topic.

Please provide useful help instead of being a keyboard warrior who only talks shit like the CCP's 50 cents

Self-explanatory.

[Goobergunchia]

Addressed.

[Attempted Socialism]

I think they're trying to double down. My underlining, original bold and italics:

Are you saying that "homosexuality is normal" and that all our future children should be encouraged to be gay too?

I agree that homosexuals should not be discriminated against…

...but it is undeniable that homosexuals are born based on their genetic or/and psychological problems that are different from ordinary people (and everyone has this tendency more or less. In particular, there will be more cases of pure boys' schools or pure girls' schools, because everyone is easy to influence each other). If you deny this statement, it means that homosexuals are normal people, and other heterosexual people are abnormal!

I do not oppose homosexuals' right to marry and have basic human rights with others, but I do not support "encourage everyone to be gay" or "condone children's tendency to increase homosexuality" ← (What I want to express is that children should be Inculcate correct sexuality and encourage them to be heterosexual to avoid them becoming gay)

The proposal I put forward is to provide students with correct sex education, normal sexual concepts and improve their sexual skills at the right time (so that they can attract the opposite sex more efficiently, save everyone's time, and improve society Overall productivity; also strengthen the relationship between couples through qualified sexual skills, reducing the chance of breakup and divorce)

It is because the traditional concept has neglected correct sex education, which has led to many tragedies, so I propose add Sexual training course on Edu.

This looks like a repeat of their "homosexuals are abnormal" stance, and adding a "homosexuals are paedos/groomers" stance. Both have been warned before.

At any rate, the earlier message from Goobergunchia wasn't well received, so perhaps a reiteration is in order even if the above does not clear the threshold for flaming and trolling?

"All homosexuals are physically or mentally ill" is trolling. The "keyboard warrior" comment, delivered OOC, is flaming. Knock it off.

Goobergunchia
Game Moderator

If you don't support my proposal, you can vote against it in WA, I posting a proposal here, not to collect votes, but to have someone help improve it. . Since you leave a message here, you should write down the reasons for your opposition in detail (and preferably provide useful suggestions) instead of just making empty criticisms (← Objections without good reason are what keyboard warriors often do, this forum should not encourage such senseless behavior!)

[Lamoni]

Taken care of.

[Kessig Wolf Run]

Respectfully, I feel like these updates (edits) to their latest post in the thread may be relevant. They continue to reiterate the stances they were already warned for:

To reiterate, I want to emphasize that heterosexuality should be encouraged (but not discriminated against homosexuality); because promoting homosexuality (violates the laws of nature, its abnormal) has the opportunity to reduce the birth rate and cause the human species to gradually disappear.

Otherwise, If homosexuality can be legalized and encouraged, then consanguineous relationships (marriage of parents and their own children, marriage of siblings) should be legalized and encouraged, because the truth is the same, it is the freedom and right of the individual! Legislation to prohibit "discrimination against close relatives" and "legalization of consanguineous marriages".

Also, sex with children should be legalized, otherwise it's age discrimination! Those "children" also have their human rights, they have the right to consider themselves "adults"! Anyway, gender cognition can be modified at will, why can't age?

[Sedgistan]

As a general rule, we don't warn for opinions; it's how they're expressed that matters. The post you're quoting by HarveyKingdoms espouses some views that many likely find abhorrent, but aren't trolling/flaming in the way that previous posts were.