Rumasaya wrote:This might be the observation of just a mere new member of the illustrious halls of the Security Council, but wouldn't it have been more beneficial for both parties in this debate to have discussed the "controversy" surrounding some actions by Karputsk from the past decade before the proposal went to a vote, instead of now airing each other's laundry in front of the entire WA to see?
As it looks like the current proposal will pass anyways I don't really see why the rest of the membership had to be subjected to this debate...
Petty politics are going to appear regardless of whether or not things were aired during the drafting, voting, or even after voting had concluded. Mainly because there's always going to be someone else to chime in with their 2 cents even after it seems like it's all over with from that first moment.
