NATION

PASSWORD

[ON HOLD] Assertion of Mission Statement

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[ON HOLD] Assertion of Mission Statement

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 7:52 am

Good afternoon folks! Long time since I've attempted to author anything, and I'm interested with these declaration things, I'm also acutely aware of the fact that no one else has attempted to propose (that I've seen) this idea, so, I figure I'll give it a try.

Assertion of Mission Statement

Category: Declaration
Type: Declare


The World Assembly,

Recognizing the formation of this august assembly in 2008 its the evolution in 2009 to two bodies; the esteemed international legislature that is the General Assembly and the international watchdog that is the Security Council,

Acknowledging the unquestionable commitment of both bodies to the development, betterment and protection of nations, member states or otherwise,

Hereby;

i. Formally declares that the fundamental principles of both esteemed bodies will never be less than the advancement, betterment, development and protection of the rights of member nations and their populace,

ii. Informs all nations, member states or otherwise, that the World Assembly will continue, as long as it is an established body, to pursue only the most noble and well intended purposes with the goal of achieving the underpinning fundamental principle,

iii. Stresses that despite the presence of individual charters and commitments of the Assembly and Council respectively, this Declaration will be a true, public facing, unilateral commitment to the never ending work of this esteemed body.


My concern is this seems so simple and straightforward to me, that I'm really surprised it hasn't been proposed already, but I submit for consideration and feedback regardless.
Last edited by Abacathea on Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:05 am, edited 11 times in total.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Minskiev
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1757
Founded: Apr 20, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minskiev » Thu Sep 16, 2021 7:57 am

Ah shit, here we go again.

I don't have any problems with the proposal itself (although I'm sure there are better words to replace "further informs"). It just seems a bit...ehh. Unnecessary.
2x Officer of the Rejected Realms
Former Speaker of the Rejected Realms
Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Rejected Times
Author of GA#565 and SC#362


WA Ambassador: Wallace Russell
My views DO represent my regions in ALL capacities!

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 7:59 am

Minskiev wrote:Ah shit, here we go again.

I don't have any problems with the proposal itself (although I'm sure there are better words to replace "further informs"). It just seems a bit...ehh. Unnecessary.


I'm a bit meh on further informs myself, so I'd be happy to change the wording but I'm drawing a blank with the cobwebs in finding a more suitable word.

As for the "here we go again" I wasn't aware this had been done before. Unnecessary could be considered when it comes to any declaration really when you think about it, maybe i'm not getting it but they seem so, common sense. But I've always been an avid fan of the WA and I think a universal declaration of "this is who we are and what we're about" is a nice addition to the books.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Great Algerstonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1858
Founded: Mar 21, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Great Algerstonia » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:00 am

Pre-emptive support based on a quick skim. Good idea.
"Nothing can stop us!" ~Ashli Babbitt

User avatar
Minskiev
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1757
Founded: Apr 20, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minskiev » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:03 am

Abacathea wrote:
Minskiev wrote:Ah shit, here we go again.

I don't have any problems with the proposal itself (although I'm sure there are better words to replace "further informs"). It just seems a bit...ehh. Unnecessary.


I'm a bit meh on further informs myself, so I'd be happy to change the wording but I'm drawing a blank with the cobwebs in finding a more suitable word.

As for the "here we go again" I wasn't aware this had been done before. Unnecessary could be considered when it comes to any declaration really when you think about it, maybe i'm not getting it but they seem so, common sense. But I've always been an avid fan of the WA and I think a universal declaration of "this is who we are and what we're about" is a nice addition to the books.


Oh, no, I meant "you're writing again" (not as an insult ok maybe I should think more before I type), not "oh not this proposal again".
2x Officer of the Rejected Realms
Former Speaker of the Rejected Realms
Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Rejected Times
Author of GA#565 and SC#362


WA Ambassador: Wallace Russell
My views DO represent my regions in ALL capacities!

User avatar
Tinhampton
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9216
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:05 am

Principals?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578
Other achievements: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; possibly very controversial; "Tinhampton? the man's literally god"
Who am I, really? 46yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading National Populism by Roger Eatwell and Matthew Goodwin

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:05 am

Minskiev wrote:
Abacathea wrote:
I'm a bit meh on further informs myself, so I'd be happy to change the wording but I'm drawing a blank with the cobwebs in finding a more suitable word.

As for the "here we go again" I wasn't aware this had been done before. Unnecessary could be considered when it comes to any declaration really when you think about it, maybe i'm not getting it but they seem so, common sense. But I've always been an avid fan of the WA and I think a universal declaration of "this is who we are and what we're about" is a nice addition to the books.


Oh, no, I meant "you're writing again" (not as an insult ok maybe I should think more before I type), not "oh not this proposal again".


LOL sorry for the misinterpretation on my part so :) I didn't think my writing had been that impactful especially given how many years have passed since I last passed anything through :rofl:
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:06 am

Tinhampton wrote:Principals?


Good catch, fixed.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Aivintis
Attaché
 
Posts: 99
Founded: Nov 11, 2018
Father Knows Best State

Postby Aivintis » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:10 am

“Further informs member states that despite … that this declaration” could be “Stresses that, despite …, this declaration”.
So just a word choice to replace further informs, except it also cuts out “member states” and the redundant repeat “that”

Tinhampton wrote:Principals?

Oh no, we’ve all been called to the Principal’s office.
“Aivintis. That’s another meme. He’s my favourite sometimes, depending on how I’m feeling.”

— Zukchiva

~ Offices ~ Awards ~ RP Nations ~

User avatar
Minskiev
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1757
Founded: Apr 20, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minskiev » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:13 am

Abacathea wrote:
Minskiev wrote:
Oh, no, I meant "you're writing again" (not as an insult ok maybe I should think more before I type), not "oh not this proposal again".


LOL sorry for the misinterpretation on my part so :) I didn't think my writing had been that impactful especially given how many years have passed since I last passed anything through :rofl:


No, it was really my poor wording :p
2x Officer of the Rejected Realms
Former Speaker of the Rejected Realms
Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Rejected Times
Author of GA#565 and SC#362


WA Ambassador: Wallace Russell
My views DO represent my regions in ALL capacities!

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:19 am

Aivintis wrote:“Further informs member states that despite … that this declaration” could be “Stresses that, despite …, this declaration”.
So just a word choice to replace further informs, except it also cuts out “member states” and the redundant repeat “that”

Tinhampton wrote:Principals?

Oh no, we’ve all been called to the Principal’s office.


Addressed, thank you :)
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1355
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Libertarian Police State

Postby Morover » Thu Sep 16, 2021 10:33 am

Gregory Perise, Morovian Ambassador to the Security Council.

"I wholeheartedly support this proposal - and welcome back the Abacathean delegation from their hiatus. I will note, however, that there are some minor grammatical errors and inconsistencies with the punctuation - I'm of the belief that the punctuation following the operative clauses should end in a semi-colon, but a comma also works. A period is definitively incorrect, in the current format."
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 10:41 am

Morover wrote:Gregory Perise, Morovian Ambassador to the Security Council.

"I wholeheartedly support this proposal - and welcome back the Abacathean delegation from their hiatus. I will note, however, that there are some minor grammatical errors and inconsistencies with the punctuation - I'm of the belief that the punctuation following the operative clauses should end in a semi-colon, but a comma also works. A period is definitively incorrect, in the current format."


I believe these have now been addressed and I thank you for your feedback and support. I am considering adding a final, "operative" clause as such of;

We the Assembly, hereby declare our intent.
Last edited by Abacathea on Thu Sep 16, 2021 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1355
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Libertarian Police State

Postby Morover » Thu Sep 16, 2021 10:47 am

Abacathea wrote:
Morover wrote:Gregory Perise, Morovian Ambassador to the Security Council.

"I wholeheartedly support this proposal - and welcome back the Abacathean delegation from their hiatus. I will note, however, that there are some minor grammatical errors and inconsistencies with the punctuation - I'm of the belief that the punctuation following the operative clauses should end in a semi-colon, but a comma also works. A period is definitively incorrect, in the current format."


I believe these have now been addressed and I thank you for your feedback and support. I am considering adding a final, "operative" clause as such of;

We the Assembly, hereby declare our intent.

Gregory Perise.

"My apologies - the final operative clause should have a period - it's the previous clauses that should be commas. I also don't believe that such a final clause is inherently necessary, and would cheapen the proposal as a whole."
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 12:35 pm

Morover wrote:
Abacathea wrote:
I believe these have now been addressed and I thank you for your feedback and support. I am considering adding a final, "operative" clause as such of;

We the Assembly, hereby declare our intent.

Gregory Perise.

"My apologies - the final operative clause should have a period - it's the previous clauses that should be commas. I also don't believe that such a final clause is inherently necessary, and would cheapen the proposal as a whole."


After due consideration, I agree.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Minister
 
Posts: 3000
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Honeydewistania » Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:24 pm

t*he


random asterisk

Also, the title needs to be clearer on what this proposal is about, cause I didn’t know what it meant until I read the draft.

I don’t understand why such a proposal is needed, anyways
she/her

Radiohead wrote:ICE AGE COMING ICE AGE COMING


The Clash wrote:The ice age is coming

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:03 pm

Honeydewistania wrote:
t*he


random asterisk

Also, the title needs to be clearer on what this proposal is about, cause I didn’t know what it meant until I read the draft.

I don’t understand why such a proposal is needed, anyways


No idea how that happened but fixed.

I agree the title could be changed yet. I’m considering something along the lines or Declaration of Mission Statement or something to that end.

As for the purpose of it, I tend (without any disrespect intended) to think it’s somewhat self explanatory. If declarations are now a thing then certainly a priority should be to declare our goals and objectives
Last edited by Abacathea on Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1355
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Libertarian Police State

Postby Morover » Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:15 pm

Abacathea wrote:
Honeydewistania wrote:
random asterisk

Also, the title needs to be clearer on what this proposal is about, cause I didn’t know what it meant until I read the draft.

I don’t understand why such a proposal is needed, anyways


No idea how that happened but fixed.

I agree the title could be changed yet. I’m considering something along the lines or Declaration of Mission Statement or something to that end.

As for the purpose of it, I tend (without any disrespect intended) to think it’s somewhat self explanatory. If declarations are now a thing then certainly a priority should be to declare our goals and objectives

OOC:
I tend to think that declarations should avoid having "declaration" in the title - something like "World Assembly Mission Statement" or "Intentions of the World Assembly" would work great.
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com

User avatar
Minskiev
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1757
Founded: Apr 20, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minskiev » Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:17 pm

Need to update the resolution title in the OP and not just the title of the thread
2x Officer of the Rejected Realms
Former Speaker of the Rejected Realms
Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Rejected Times
Author of GA#565 and SC#362


WA Ambassador: Wallace Russell
My views DO represent my regions in ALL capacities!

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:17 pm

Morover wrote:
Abacathea wrote:
No idea how that happened but fixed.

I agree the title could be changed yet. I’m considering something along the lines or Declaration of Mission Statement or something to that end.

As for the purpose of it, I tend (without any disrespect intended) to think it’s somewhat self explanatory. If declarations are now a thing then certainly a priority should be to declare our goals and objectives

OOC:
I tend to think that declarations should avoid having "declaration" in the title - something like "World Assembly Mission Statement" or "Intentions of the World Assembly" would work great.


OOC: I'm inclined to agree entirely, I was just having major brain fog when I started the draft earlier, and I wanted to go through a drafting process after so many years for this very reason. I've changed the title, I'm not sure I'm keen on assertion yet, but it's certainly clearer than the former title at any rate.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Thu Sep 16, 2021 5:18 pm

Minskiev wrote:Need to update the resolution title in the OP and not just the title of the thread


I literally just changed it lol
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Gorundu
Envoy
 
Posts: 278
Founded: May 02, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Gorundu » Fri Sep 17, 2021 12:19 am

I'd rather see this one getting passed. At least it says something concrete, even if that is "the SC has no legislative power".
Former Minister of Communications & Minister of World Assembly Affairs of The North Pacific

Badge hunter (x3)
Now exclusively authors repeals to destroy the hard work of others
Hasn't lurked in the GA forums for a long time
Will maybe one day make an IC WA Ambassador
Author of GA#485, GA#516, SC#337 and the other one we don't talk about
Posts do not represent my region's views unless stated otherwise.

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Fri Sep 17, 2021 4:25 am

Gorundu wrote:I'd rather see this one getting passed. At least it says something concrete, even if that is "the SC has no legislative power".


I wasn’t aware it existed, having read it though, it appears to be somewhat critical of the Security Council in its composition, something I am not a fan of. I will be pursuing this accordingly. Apologies if this one isn’t to your tastes.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Gorundu
Envoy
 
Posts: 278
Founded: May 02, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Gorundu » Fri Sep 17, 2021 5:14 am

Abacathea wrote:
Gorundu wrote:I'd rather see this one getting passed. At least it says something concrete, even if that is "the SC has no legislative power".


I wasn’t aware it existed, having read it though, it appears to be somewhat critical of the Security Council in its composition, something I am not a fan of. I will be pursuing this accordingly. Apologies if this one isn’t to your tastes.

Critical? No, just blunt.
Former Minister of Communications & Minister of World Assembly Affairs of The North Pacific

Badge hunter (x3)
Now exclusively authors repeals to destroy the hard work of others
Hasn't lurked in the GA forums for a long time
Will maybe one day make an IC WA Ambassador
Author of GA#485, GA#516, SC#337 and the other one we don't talk about
Posts do not represent my region's views unless stated otherwise.

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2146
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Abacathea » Fri Sep 17, 2021 7:16 am

Gorundu wrote:
Abacathea wrote:
I wasn’t aware it existed, having read it though, it appears to be somewhat critical of the Security Council in its composition, something I am not a fan of. I will be pursuing this accordingly. Apologies if this one isn’t to your tastes.

Critical? No, just blunt.


We'll have to agree to disagree here. Interpretation is always going to play a factor in drafting, but what you've linked me too appears to be a less than thinly veiled attempt to state "The Security Council is a toothless dog" behind the veil of a mission statement, and I don't agree with it nor do I like it.

I will pursue my own interest and objective and we'll let the nations decide if it gets to vote. I thank you for your input regardless.

OOC: i accept that many players dont particularily care for the SC, and the draft you've linked me too looks like exactly that, a player who doesnt care for the SC admonishing the SC in the guise of a declaration, I don't like it because I'd be the opposite side of the spectrum. Simple as.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads