NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] The Birdman of Pelicanz

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

[DRAFT] The Birdman of Pelicanz

Postby Bears Armed » Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:27 am

Notes
1. This was inspired by the film ‘The Birdman of Alcatraz’, which was a fictionalized account of a true story. (For one thing, in RL the convict’s bird-keeping had taken place while he was imprisoned at Fort Leavenworth, and had to stop once he was transferred to Alcatraz...)
2. The place-name ‘Alcatraz’, which is of Spanish origin, actually means ‘Pelicans’.
3. The “fixed” name assigned in this draft to the convict commemorates the actor in the RL film, as well as the RL convict himself: ‘Bert’ for both Burt Lancaster and Robert Stroud, and ‘Gloucester’ not only as a substitute for Lancaster -- as another English county-town -- but also because there's a Stroud’ that is a town in Gloucestershire).
4. In RL Mopery is more of a "placeholder" term, or one used in humorous fiction, rather than a genuine offence: What it means IC in the receiving nation is, of course, up to that nation' player to decide.
5. Have I coded for the multiple @@RANDMONAME@@s, and the @@HE1@@ associated with the first of those (in the third option) correctly? I suppose switching the order of the second & third options, with a slight change to the "offbeat" one accordingly, would remove the need for this and let me just use @@RANDOMNAME@@ without numbers in each case: Do people think that that would be better?
6. In the third clause I've put "EVERYBODY" in all-caps because the speaker is emphasizing that word: I'd be happier with either boldface or underlining, but does the issues-writing system allow either of those?
7. The speakers' titles are the most obvious point with which I'm not entirely happy.

58. My first draft on this idea, hand-written due to a lack of computer access at the time, was produced early in the UK’s first ‘lockdown’ last year... but, unfortunately, has since been lost. I seem to recall that it ws better than this one is starting off as...


Version 1.3
The Birdman of Pelicanz

[issue]Many @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ have been enthralled by a recently-released film based on the true story of how convict Bert Gloucester, serving a life sentence for aggravated mopery in the high-security prison on Pelicanz Island, carefully nursed an injured sparrow that had flown into his cell back to health and then kept it as a pet.
[validity]Only if the nation has prisons.

[option]"Gloucester not only tamed the bird, he tamed himself as well in the process," comments @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@, your Minister for Optimistic Solutions. "Before that incident he was a violent troublemaker, but now he's a model prisoner. We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds, perhaps by having good results in that lead to improved conditions for the convicts and be useable as evidence in their favour at parole hearings."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]the jails are alive with the sound of birdsong

[option]]"Bah, humbug!" retorts @@RANDMONAME@@, the Minister for Pessimistic Solutions. "Those scum will just pretend to care about the birds, for the benefits that you'd give them. Convicts don't even deserve free time in which to practice hobbies: Outside of the hours officially set aside for sleeping and other necessary actions they should all be working, to repay their debts to society."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]chain-gangs are a common sight alongside rural roads

[option]"I agree with @@RANDMONAME(1)@@," says @@RANDOMNAME@@, Minister for Offbeat Solutions, "but @@HE(1)@@ isn't going far enough. We should encourage everybody in @@NAME@@ to keep pet birds, for a happier and more law-abiding population, even if that means we have to import the birds themselves or some of the associated materiel."
[validity]only if nation does not have ‘Autarky’ policy? (or might it work as a reversal for that?)
[effect]@@NAME@@ is @@REGION@@’s largest importer of birdseed


Alternative effect-line for the third option:
the cage-bird trade isn't just cheeping it's booming


[spoiler=Version 1.2[/spoiler]The Birdman of Pelicanz

[issue]Many @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ have been enthralled by a recently-released film based on the true story of how convict Bert Gloucester, serving a life sentence for aggravated mopery in the high-security prison on Pelicanz Island, carefully nursed an injured sparrow that had flown into his cell back to health and then kept it as a pet.
[validity]Only if the nation has prisons.

[option]"Gloucester not only tamed the bird, he tamed himself as well in the process," comments @@RANDOMNAME_1@, your Minister for Optimistic Solutions. "Before that incident he was a violent troublemaker, but now he's a model prisoner. We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds, perhaps by having good results in that lead to improved conditions for the convicts and be useable as evidence in their favour at parole hearings."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]the jails are alive with the sound of birdsong

[option]]"Bah, humbug!" retorts @@RANDMONAME@@, the Minister for Pessimistic Solutions. "Those scum will just pretend to care about the birds, for the benefits that you'd give them. Convicts don't even deserve free time in which to practice hobbies: Outside of the hours officially set aside for sleeping and other necessary actions they should all be working, to repay their debts to society."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]chain-gangs are a common sight alongside rural roads

[option]"I agree with @@RANDMONAME_1@@," says @@RANDOMNAME@@, Minister for Offbeat Solutions, "basically, but @@HE_1@@ isn't going far enough. We should encourage everybody in @@NAME@@ to keep pet birds, for a happier and more law-abiding population, even if that means we have to import the birds themselves or some of the associated materiel."
[validity]only if nation does not have ‘Autarky’ policy? (or might it work as a reversal for that?)
[effect]@@NAME@@ is @@REGION@@’s largest importer of birdseed[/spoiler]

Version 1.1[box]The Birdman of Pelicanz

[issue]Many @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ have been enthralled by a recently-released film based on the true story of how convict Bert Gloucester, serving a life sentence for aggravated mopery in the high-security prison on Pelicanz Island, carefully nursed an injured sparrow that had flown into his cell back to health and then kept it as a pet.
[validity]Only if the nation has prisons.

[option]"Gloucester not only tamed the bird, he tamed himself as well in the process," comments @@RANDOMNAME1@, your Minister for Optimistic Solutions. "Before that incident he was a violent troublemaker, but now he's a model prisoner. We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds, perhaps by having good results in that lead to improved conditions for the convicts and be useable as evidence in their favour at parole hearings."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]the jails are alive with the sound of birdsong

[option]]"Bah, humbug!" retorts @@RANDMONAME2@@, the Minister for Pessimistic Solutions. "Those scum will just pretend to care about the birds, for the benefits that you'd give them. Convicts don't even deserve free time in which to practice hobbies: Outside of the hours officially set aside for sleeping and other necessary actions they should all be working, to repay their debts to society."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]chain-gangs are a common sight alongside @@NAME@@’s rural roads

[option]"I agree with @@RANDMONAME1@@," says @@RANDOMNAME@@, Minister for Offbeat Solutions, "basically, but @@HE1@@ isn't going far enough. We should encourage everybody in @@NAME@@ to keep pet birds, for a happier and more law-abiding population, even if that means we have to import the birds themselves or some of the associated materiel."
[validity]only if nation does not have ‘Autarky’ policy? (or might it work as a reversal for that?)
[effect]@@NAME@@ is @@REGION@@’s largest importer of birdseed


The Birdman of Pelicanz

[issue]Many @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ have been enthralled by a recently-released film based on the true story of how convict Bert Gloucester, serving a life sentence for aggravated mopery in the high-security prison on Pelicanz Island, carefully nursed an injured sparrow that had flown into his cell back to health and then kept it as a pet.
[validity]Only if the nation has prisons.

[option]"Gloucester not only tamed the bird, he tamed himself as well in the process," comments @@RANDOMNAME1@, your Minister for Optimistic Solutions. "Before that incident he was a violent troublemaker, but now he's a model prisoner. We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds, perhaps by having good results in that lead to improved conditions for the convicts and be useable as evidence in their favour at parole hearings."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]the jails are alive with the sound of birdsong

[option]]"Bah, humbug!" retorts @@RANDMONAME2@@, the Minister for Pessimistic Solutions. "Those scum will just pretend to care about the birds, for the benefits that you'd give them. Convicts don't even deserve free time in which to practice hobbies: Outside of the hours officially set aside for sleeping and other necessary actions they should all be working, to repay their debts to society."
[validity]unrestricted
[effect]chain-gangs are a common sight alongside @@NAME@@’s roads

[option]"I agree with @@RANDMONAME1@@," says @@RANDOMNAME@@, Minister for Offbeat Solutions, "basically, but @@HE1@@ isn't going far enough. We should encourage EVERYBODY in @@NAME@@ to keep pet birds, for a happier and more law-abiding population, even if that means we have to import the birds themselves or some of the associated materiel."
[validity]only if nation does not have ‘Autarky’ policy? (or might it work as a reversal for that?)
[effect]@@NAME@@ is @@REGION@@’s largest importer of birdseed


Changelog
Version 1.0 to Version 1.1 _ effect line for second option has word "rural" inserted before "roads"; word "everybody" in third option changed from ALL-CAPS to boldface.
Version 1.1 to Version 1.2 _ see viewtopic.php?p=38983241#p38983241 .
Version 1.2 to Version 1.3 _ Coding used for numbered @@RANDOMNAME@@ altered to form suggested by Verdant Haven. One word ("basically") deleted from option 3.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:22 am, edited 11 times in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9473
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:06 am

Bears Armed wrote:6. In the third clause I've put "EVERYBODY" in all-caps because the speaker is emphasizing that word: I'd be happier with either boldface or underlining, but does the issues-writing system allow either of those?
Yes. Maybe there was a time when issues didn't allow that, but that was centuries ago. Perhaps it was always possible and we only thought it wasn't due to poor communication.

Bears Armed wrote:"We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds,"
Surely non-avian pets would work just as well*? Sure, they're less likely to fly into your cell's window, but that's not an issue if the prison guards are supplying you with them.

* By which I mean "not well at all". For every prisoner on whom the pet is a positive influence, there are going to be several who will just end up abusing the animals.

Bears Armed wrote:Alternative effect-line for the third option:
the cage-bird trade isn't just cheeping it's booming
That made me think more of the first option... something like:
more birds than ever are found in cages
The joke being that the birds themselves may not necessarily be caged, but their owners are :)
Last edited by Trotterdam on Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sat Sep 11, 2021 5:06 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:6. In the third clause I've put "EVERYBODY" in all-caps because the speaker is emphasizing that word: I'd be happier with either boldface or underlining, but does the issues-writing system allow either of those?
Yes. Maybe there was a time when issues didn't allow that, but that was centuries ago. Perhaps is was always possible and we only thought it wasn't due to poor communication.
Thank you for the clarification. I'll switch to boldface for this word in the next version posted.

Trotterdam wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:"We should encourage all criminals who are serving long sentences to keep pet birds,"
Surely non-avian pets would work just as well*? Sure, they're less likely to fly into your cell's window, but that's not an issue if the prison guards are supplying you with them.

* By which I mean "not well at all". For every prisoner on whom the pet is a positive influence, there are going to be several who will just end up abusing the animals.


Cats and dogs -- let alone, for example, ponies -- would probably be impractical to keep in the cells.
Goldfish, stick insects, and tortoises, could be kept in the cells but arguably would be even less likely to trigger such an empathetic (I think that that's the correct term...) response in the prisoners.
The sorts of rodents most commonly kept as pets probably would work about as well as birds, yes, but if I add those then there will be people asking why I did so when the issues' title & inspiring film were specifically about a bird-keeper: Better to keep it simple by sticking to that single concept, I think.

That minister is explicitly labelled as an optimist... and even under their plan prisoners who mistreat the pets wouldn't receive the better treatment or parole board recommendations that prisoners who look after the pets properly would get, and probably wouldn't get replacements for the original pets neither.

Bears Armed wrote:Alternative effect-line for the third option:
the cage-bird trade isn't just cheeping it's booming
That made me thing more of the first option... something like:
more birds than ever are found in cages
The joke being that the birds themselves may not necessarily be caged, but their owners are :)

I'll think about this.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Cranberron
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Aug 12, 2021
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cranberron » Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:58 am

I love it! :D I think you should stick with Option #3 being invalid for nations with the Autarky feature rather than making it a reversal, but I don't think it matters very much either way.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:13 pm

Cranberron wrote:I love it! :D I think you should stick with Option #3 being invalid for nations with the Autarky feature rather than making it a reversal, but I don't think it matters very much either way.

Thank you. I'll probably leave the Autarky question in the draft right up to submission, as something for the editors to decide (which they could do anyway, of course...).

__________________________________________________________________________________

In the next draft I'll probably modify the effect line for option 2 by having the chain-gangs seen [only] alongside @@NAME@@'s rural roads: That's probably likelier IC, I think.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Tue Sep 14, 2021 7:38 am

Version 1.0 has been replaced by version 1.1 , with the two minor changes that I've already mentioned.

Now, please can somebody clarify how numbering @@RANDOMNAME@@s works for me (and, preferably, point out where in the rules it's explained)?
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Terrabod
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Jan 10, 2018
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Terrabod » Tue Sep 14, 2021 9:55 am

Bears Armed wrote:Now, please can somebody clarify how numbering @@RANDOMNAME@@s works for me (and, preferably, point out where in the rules it's explained)?

I've seen it more commonly written as @@RANDOMNAME_1@@/@@HE_1@@ etc. I also think you only need to number those that you refer to later on (so, if this is true, the speaker of Option 2 could just be @@RANDOMNAME@@). For the record, I don't think this is explained anywhere (maybe I should start my own accredited course?); linking names might even be something done behind the scenes by the Editors, in which case the whole "_1" thing is just a placeholder... it's a mystery.

While we're talking about the codes, the use of "@@NAME@@'s" is frowned upon because if your nation was called "Flowers" then the code would produce a grammatically incorrect "Flowers's" - it's not smart enough to just add an apostrophe if your nation name ends with "s". The same can be said for "@@LEADER@@'s", not that you've done that here.
My Issues
#1477
Culture Minister
of Forest
- P L E A S ES T A N DB Y -
---------------------

All posts are OOC.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:59 am

Terrabod wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:Now, please can somebody clarify how numbering @@RANDOMNAME@@s works for me (and, preferably, point out where in the rules it's explained)?

I've seen it more commonly written as @@RANDOMNAME_1@@/@@HE_1@@ etc. I also think you only need to number those that you refer to later on (so, if this is true, the speaker of Option 2 could just be @@RANDOMNAME@@). For the record, I don't think this is explained anywhere (maybe I should start my own accredited course?); linking names might even be something done behind the scenes by the Editors, in which case the whole "_1" thing is just a placeholder... it's a mystery.
Thank you. That interpretation makes sense, and I'll switch to it -- unless instructed otherwise by editors -- in version 1.2.

While we're talking about the codes, the use of "@@NAME@@'s" is frowned upon because if your nation was called "Flowers" then the code would produce a grammatically incorrect "Flowers's" - it's not smart enough to just add an apostrophe if your nation name ends with "s". The same can be said for "@@LEADER@@'s", not that you've done that here.
Good point. I'll drop the word, which I suppose isn't really needed there anyway, in version 1.2.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9473
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Sep 15, 2021 12:28 pm

Terrabod wrote:I've seen it more commonly written as @@RANDOMNAME_1@@/@@HE_1@@ etc. I also think you only need to number those that you refer to later on (so, if this is true, the speaker of Option 2 could just be @@RANDOMNAME@@). For the record, I don't think this is explained anywhere (maybe I should start my own accredited course?); linking names might even be something done behind the scenes by the Editors, in which case the whole "_1" thing is just a placeholder... it's a mystery.
For the record, the @@RANDOMNAME_1@@ format was actually invented by me, not the editors, for the sake of making readable reports in the spoiler thread.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Sep 15, 2021 12:33 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Terrabod wrote:I've seen it more commonly written as @@RANDOMNAME_1@@/@@HE_1@@ etc. I also think you only need to number those that you refer to later on (so, if this is true, the speaker of Option 2 could just be @@RANDOMNAME@@). For the record, I don't think this is explained anywhere (maybe I should start my own accredited course?); linking names might even be something done behind the scenes by the Editors, in which case the whole "_1" thing is just a placeholder... it's a mystery.
For the record, the @@RANDOMNAME_1@@ format was actually invented by me, not the editors, for the sake of making readable reports in the spoiler thread.

Ah. Does this mean that it doesn't work in the issues themselves, or have the editors adopted it as well? If they haven't then I'll have to move the current third option into second place, after all, even though that breaks the usual pattern of putting the odd/extreme one last.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Wed Sep 15, 2021 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9473
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Sep 15, 2021 12:56 pm

Bears Armed wrote:Ah. Does this mean that it doesn't work in the issues themselves, or have the editors adopted it as well? If they haven't then I'll have to move the current third option into second place, after all, even though that breaks the usual pattern of putting the odd/extreme one last.
The behind-the-scenes formatting of the macros is different from what players are told to use, even for the really basic ones. For example, an editor once accidentally leaked a macro that said "@@$nation->query_capital()@@" instead of "@@CAPITAL@@".

The editors definitely have some way of making pronouns refer to a specific randomname, but I don't know the exact syntax, and I'm pretty sure it's less convenient than the ones we usually use in public. Let the editors worry about it.

(I suspect that their method involves randomnames being implicitly numbered by the order they appear in the issue, and only pronouns explicitly citing those numbers. This has caused glitches when an option with a randomname doesn't always appear due to a validity requirement, as it throws off the numbering.)

A bare pronoun (not citing which randomname it applies to) will automatically apply to the most recent randomname (even if that's in a previous option). This can be mixed freely with numbered ones.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Sep 15, 2021 3:49 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:Ah. Does this mean that it doesn't work in the issues themselves, or have the editors adopted it as well? If they haven't then I'll have to move the current third option into second place, after all, even though that breaks the usual pattern of putting the odd/extreme one last.
The behind-the-scenes formatting of the macros is different from what players are told to use, even for the really basic ones. For example, an editor once accidentally leaked a macro that said "@@$nation->query_capital()@@" instead of "@@CAPITAL@@".

The editors definitely have some way of making pronouns refer to a specific randomname, but I don't know the exact syntax, and I'm pretty sure it's less convenient than the ones we usually use in public. Let the editors worry about it.

Hr'rmm, thank you, I probably will do so.

(I suspect that their method involves randomnames being implicitly numbered by the order they appear in the issue, and only pronouns explicitly citing those numbers. This has caused glitches when an option with a randomname doesn't always appear due to a validity requirement, as it throws off the numbering.)
Fortunately the only option in my draft that might not occur (depending on whether it ends up requiring not having the autarky policy or just cancels that...) is the one with the numbered pronoun, so that possibility wouldn't be a problem here.

A bare pronoun (not citing which randomname it applies to) will automatically apply to the most recent randomname (even if that's in a previous option). This can be mixed freely with numbered ones.
So that would work if I switched the order of options 2 & 3, instead. Also "Hr'rmm"...
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Terrabod
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Jan 10, 2018
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Terrabod » Wed Sep 15, 2021 5:12 pm

Trotterdam wrote:For the record, the @@RANDOMNAME_1@@ format was actually invented by me, not the editors, for the sake of making readable reports in the spoiler thread.

A living legend.
My Issues
#1477
Culture Minister
of Forest
- P L E A S ES T A N DB Y -
---------------------

All posts are OOC.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Thu Sep 16, 2021 1:20 pm

Version 1.2, with the two minor changes mentioned here, has been posted.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Thu Sep 16, 2021 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Verdant Haven
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 840
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Verdant Haven » Fri Sep 17, 2021 9:59 am

Bears Armed wrote:Now, please can somebody clarify how numbering @@RANDOMNAME@@s works for me (and, preferably, point out where in the rules it's explained)?


This particular element is uncommon enough that it isn't really explained anywhere in the FAQ. As is, many macros have to be manually re-written/checked by editors and turned into the somewhat complicated formats that actually function in the game (and there might be multiple possible formats to choose among, depending on the specific contexts of their appearance in an issue), so a lot of the macros in the FAQ simply work as a consistent way for authors to indicate what is intended. That way, we can get it set up backstage.

In re your specific query about what to use, any consistent format that makes clear what you mean will work! Trott's use of _# on the end of a name or pronoun is acceptable. Others just add a number or use parentheses instead of an underscore. As long as the intention is clear, we can sort out the relevant details for the particular usage.
- Verdant Haven

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Fri Sep 17, 2021 10:11 am

Verdant Haven wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:Now, please can somebody clarify how numbering @@RANDOMNAME@@s works for me (and, preferably, point out where in the rules it's explained)?


This particular element is uncommon enough that it isn't really explained anywhere in the FAQ. As is, many macros have to be manually re-written/checked by editors and turned into the somewhat complicated formats that actually function in the game (and there might be multiple possible formats to choose among, depending on the specific contexts of their appearance in an issue), so a lot of the macros in the FAQ simply work as a consistent way for authors to indicate what is intended. That way, we can get it set up backstage.

In re your specific query about what to use, any consistent format that makes clear what you mean will work! Trott's use of _# on the end of a name or pronoun is acceptable. Others just add a number or use parentheses instead of an underscore. As long as the intention is clear, we can sort out the relevant details for the particular usage.

Okay, thank you.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 20235
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:25 am

Version 1.3, with change to @@RANDOMNAME@@ numbering method as suggested by Verdant Haven and with one word (i.e. "basically") removed from option 3, has been posted.

Bearing in mind the absence of major criticism so far, do people -- especially any editors who might be looking -- think that this is ready for submission?
Last edited by Bears Armed on Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads