NATION

PASSWORD

Pro-life/Pro-women health Proposal Make give and take

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Pro-life/Pro-women health Proposal Make give and take

Postby Texkentuck » Mon Jul 19, 2021 9:45 pm

This proposal would look after all parties and doesn't favor one party over the other. It's a proposal of give and take- If I need to add more or take away please let me know I'm an amature in writing proposals.... We need a proposal that makes sense and keeps the doctor visits between women and doctors. Also defending the life of a child who is meant to be born.

I wrote this before and it clearly shows the inner workings of what I would like for the proposal to based from in the message below. that's fair for the WA and all nations by coming to the defense of the unborn and looking after the mothers and doctors... We need to base a proposal off of what I wrote in order to look after each party to the best of it's ability.


The question as to when the physical material dimension of a human being begins is strictly a scientific question, and fundamentally should be answered by human embryologists not by philosophers
. During the process of fertilization, the sperm and the oocyte cease to exist as such, and a new human being is produced. Our nation stands with science... Also this proposal took away the rights of a doctor to make a choice not to do an abortion. My nation understand there is a clear difference between womens health and sheer practice of abortion. If the womens uterus is in jeopardy then it should be left up to the women. If we made a pro-life proposal that ignores the health of the women completely then that would be a proposal ruled by religion. We need proposals that defend the life of a child but also makes sure the women can have an abortion if the womens life is truly in jeopardy. Abortion is more dangerous of a procedure than child birth. Child birth is natural and abortion is not.

In Texkentuck most abortions are ilegal but if a women is notified by doctors that the child birth is dangerous or herself/ baby/uterus is in jeopardy during birth then the abortion would be allowed. If our nations laws went completely off religion the women would be forced to have a child. But even in religion just the act of forcing a women to make a sacrifice of herself or uterus takes away her basic religious decision to choose to sacrifice herself or her uterus for the purpose of giving life to her child.

Even God the Father let Jesus himself to make the decision to die for the sins of man when Christ didn't have too... In that case was virtuous. Because of that lesson it should be left up to the women when her life is in Jeopardy like Christs. But when it's just about sheer termination of a pregnancy it's more than just one women's life or health but the individual child with the basic gift of life which Texkentucks' constitution defends. It's virtuous whenever a women chooses to sacrifice herself for her child but the moment the state takes that away the virtue is lost and religious freedom is in jeapardy. But also if sheer abortions are allowed the Childs basic given rights are now also too in Jeopardy as well as God given right. Both must be defended....,Also if a women chooses to not sacrifice herself or her uterus for a child there is a reason which our governments and this WA has no right to judge because God's will may be for her to give birth to the next child or to be alive for her family sake...A household without a mother because of such a sacrifice may lead to societies destruction. God doesn't want for people to be stupid. There is a reason we have a mind, mouth, and eyes. This proposal is simply about the human rights of a doctor. No doctor should be forced to do an abortion because it's intruding on the rights of a doctor. Technically the women can find another doctors because of passed proposals of this WA. Technically this WA isn't concerned about the rights of individuals and values the right of the mother over everyones rights which isn't justice nor did it improve human rights. The WA nations who voted against keeping this proposal is illogical and simple minded. For that this WA has lowered itself on the civil rights spectrum in the oppinion of our nation Texkentuck.....

Simply this WA ignores the science that says it's a child and is totally rejecting the rights of a doctor. It's a human rights atrocity...Also in all civil rights cases there is always an oppressor with more rights than others...Technically and as horrible it sounds a women can do the abortion herself and in that case she's the opressor and the child is more and likely the victim.... As I've stated there are contraceptives that can be taken to terminate a pregnancy that is not late term. We aren't talking about tissue. Also if this proposal stays in place the doctors rights are respected and do to the pro-choice proposal in place by this WA the women can have a sheer abortion for just any reason. Which Texkentuck is against... This WA by removing a proposal to defend rights is a human rights atrocity and an attack on a doctors convictions of a religious, agnostic, athiest doctor that has some value to not terminate a life because science says it's a human...

Hope that this WA actually understands it's flaw and puts a good proposal in place....

From the Parliament of Texkentuck Monarchy Republic Federation...

President Bram W. Schirkophf
Texkentuck
Last edited by Texkentuck on Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:38 am, edited 8 times in total.

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1264
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Libertarian Police State

Postby Morover » Mon Jul 19, 2021 9:48 pm

This will never pass for several reasons. I have listed the two biggest below:

1. It is irreparably illegal, unless you repeal GA499.
2. The state of the WA will not get behind this.
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com

User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Texkentuck » Mon Jul 19, 2021 9:53 pm

Morover wrote:This will never pass for several reasons. I have listed the two biggest below:

1. It is irreparably illegal, unless you repeal GA499.
2. The state of the WA will not get behind this.


That's true- So hopefully GA499 will be repealed. In the time being hope to get feed back on how we can make the best proposal.. Thx

We need a proposal that's less extreme-defends life and looks after every party....Most pro-life proposals would completely ban contraceptives. Just trying to make it in which a growing child doesn't feel pain. It's a human rights issue.....
Last edited by Texkentuck on Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sincluda
Envoy
 
Posts: 283
Founded: Feb 05, 2021
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sincluda » Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:46 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Morover wrote:This will never pass for several reasons. I have listed the two biggest below:

1. It is irreparably illegal, unless you repeal GA499.
2. The state of the WA will not get behind this.


That's true- So hopefully GA499 will be repealed. In the time being hope to get feed back on how we can make the best proposal.. Thx

We need a proposal that's less extreme-defends life and looks after every party....Most pro-life proposals would completely ban contraceptives. Just trying to make it in which a growing child doesn't feel pain. It's a human rights issue.....

Perhaps, instead of sitting around waiting for GAR499 to be repealed, you could do it yourself. However, that is extremely unlikely, but more productive towards your cause than waiting. Then you may proceed with your proposal. Then I would be happy to help (although I would not support), as I can spot several areas in need of some changes.
Last edited by Sincluda on Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
He/Him
Fight the climate crisis!

World Assembly
~Sincludan Prime Ambassador Harrison Raiken
NS Sport
Publisher of The Sincludan Athlete
Manager of the Sincludan Olympic Team (and all other teams/players, really)

RIP Rojava
Weekly Video: Tinhampton reacts to me changing this video!

User avatar
Bananaistan
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 3042
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:12 am

Morover wrote:This will never pass for several reasons. I have listed the two biggest below:

1. It is irreparably illegal, unless you repeal GA499.
2. The state of the WA will not get behind this.


OOC: GAR#286 also.
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Texkentuck » Tue Jul 20, 2021 1:17 am

Bananaistan wrote:
Morover wrote:This will never pass for several reasons. I have listed the two biggest below:

1. It is irreparably illegal, unless you repeal GA499.
2. The state of the WA will not get behind this.


OOC: GAR#286 also.


This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

User avatar
Daarwyrth
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1761
Founded: Jul 05, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Daarwyrth » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:26 am

Texkentuck wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:
OOC: GAR#286 also.


This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

OOC: You say the WA is crooked, yet you fail to consider that perhaps you are the odd one out, not the other way around. Your perspectives on the world and life aren't universal, and in this case, they're opposed by a majority. I assume that if a majority of the WA supported your proposal the organisation would suddenly not be crooked? In other words, it's only crooked if it disagrees with you, and that reveals quite a bit about your intentions here, I'd say.
Last edited by Daarwyrth on Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Royal State of Daarwyrth

Current year: 2021 CE | Leader: Queen Demi Maria I | Capital: Daarsted | Government type: Unitary semi-constitutional monarchy | Technology level: Post-modern tech
List of Authored Writings | Factbook on Daarwyrth | Factbook on Queen Demi Maria I | Royal House of Zylkoven | WA Representatives | Political Parties | Diplomatic Programme
Played nations
  • Daarwyrth
  • Great Robertia
  • Independent Democratic Socialist States
Who am I?
  • 25 years old male
  • Dutch and Polish
  • English literature major
  • Ex-religious gay leftist

User avatar
Tsaivao
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: Apr 07, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Tsaivao » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:32 am

OOC: Mate you are just absolutely speedrunning through as many illegalities as possible with this proposal. Branding, 4th wall breaks, proposal basics, lack of operative clause, contradictions of previous legislation... My head is spinning just trying to keep track of it lol

Texkentuck wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:
OOC: GAR#286 also.


This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

I mean, you're trying to do a complete 180 on all previous precedent and undo a large amount of effort and progress. Did you think that was going to be easy?
~::~ May the five winds guide us to glory ~::~
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
Nation doesn't reflect my personal beliefs, NS stats aren't really worried about except for Nudity because "haha funny"
The symbol on my flag is supposed to be a typhoon
Pro: LGBT, BLM, Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Rationalism
Neutral: Gun Rights, Abortion, Centrism
Anti: Trumpism, Radicalization, Fundamentalism, Fascism

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15785
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:35 am

OOC: Ok so I just skimmed a bit of the OP but what made me laugh hard enough to get a coughing attack was "contraceptives should be easily available but should stay in talks between woman and her doctor" or something like that - exactly how do you think contraceptives work? They need to be used on the body (easiest are used on the man's body, at that), not just talked about. Unless you intended to talk a woman's ovaries to death? :rofl:
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16050
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:38 am

Tsaivao wrote:contradictions of previous legislation...

OOC: In fact it is so contradictory it contradicts itself...
B: An abortion may only be proceeded when the mothers/child/uteri is in jeopardy

C: A child may not be aborted after conception because science states that it's human after that stage.

*thinking*

User avatar
Tsaivao
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: Apr 07, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Tsaivao » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:38 am

Araraukar wrote:OOC: Ok so I just skimmed a bit of the OP but what made me laugh hard enough to get a coughing attack was "contraceptives should be easily available but should stay in talks between woman and her doctor" or something like that - exactly how do you think contraceptives work? They need to be used on the body (easiest are used on the man's body, at that), not just talked about. Unless you intended to talk a woman's ovaries to death? :rofl:

Hell, just let me talk to women, me talking about my unhealthy obsession with modern armor doctrine will make a better contraceptive than anything else!
~::~ May the five winds guide us to glory ~::~
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
Nation doesn't reflect my personal beliefs, NS stats aren't really worried about except for Nudity because "haha funny"
The symbol on my flag is supposed to be a typhoon
Pro: LGBT, BLM, Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Rationalism
Neutral: Gun Rights, Abortion, Centrism
Anti: Trumpism, Radicalization, Fundamentalism, Fascism

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15785
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:40 am

Tsaivao wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Ok so I just skimmed a bit of the OP but what made me laugh hard enough to get a coughing attack was "contraceptives should be easily available but should stay in talks between woman and her doctor" or something like that - exactly how do you think contraceptives work? They need to be used on the body (easiest are used on the man's body, at that), not just talked about. Unless you intended to talk a woman's ovaries to death? :rofl:

Hell, just let me talk to women, me talking about my unhealthy obsession with modern armor doctrine will make a better contraceptive than anything else!

OOC: No that's a contraceptive working on YOU, not the woman. :p
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10657
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jul 20, 2021 9:59 am

Tsaivao wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Ok so I just skimmed a bit of the OP but what made me laugh hard enough to get a coughing attack was "contraceptives should be easily available but should stay in talks between woman and her doctor" or something like that - exactly how do you think contraceptives work? They need to be used on the body (easiest are used on the man's body, at that), not just talked about. Unless you intended to talk a woman's ovaries to death? :rofl:

Hell, just let me talk to women, me talking about my unhealthy obsession with modern armor doctrine will make a better contraceptive than anything else!

Yes, yes, but Is Your Car Safe From Supermaneuverable Air-Defense Fighter Aircraft?

Author: 1 SC and 42 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Jedinsto
Diplomat
 
Posts: 905
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Jedinsto » Tue Jul 20, 2021 11:09 am

B: An abortion may only be proceeded when the mothers/child/uteri is in jeopardy

C: A child may not be aborted after conception because science states that it's human after that stage.

Hmm yes very consistent.

If this was actually well done and legal I might've supported it.

Edit: Well more like what I would have supported is something that guarantees women the right to an abortion when the pregnancy puts them in danger or she was raped, or other extreme circumstances, and a blocker of a full ban and a blocker of a full ban of banning abortion, but that's not what this is. Most of this proposal is a slab of shit.
Last edited by Jedinsto on Tue Jul 20, 2021 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Go approve Commend Imperium Anglorum
James DuBois
Working on- Against Quorum Raiding and Prison Reform Act.
Delegate of Cyrannus Star System, CNS writer, WA ministry staffer in TNP.
Authorships- GA#555, GA#558 and GA#563

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12244
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:24 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:
OOC: GAR#286 also.


This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

Ah, more "WA is corrupt" nonsense. If you don't want to bother with the WA, then you can always resign.
social democracy, environmental protection, universal healthcare, free college, social equality, LGBT, pro-choice,
GOP, corporate socialism, Trump, neoconservatism, white supremacy, extreme political views, corruption

User avatar
Wayneactia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wayneactia » Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:29 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:
OOC: GAR#286 also.


This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

No one cares. You are taking such an extreme stance, no one is interested in your opinions. We have heard all of this before, and we will hear it again and again until humanity ceases to exist.
Last edited by Wayneactia on Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Texkentuck » Tue Jul 20, 2021 7:59 pm

Wayneactia wrote:
Texkentuck wrote:
This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked... :rofl:

No one cares. You are taking such an extreme stance, no one is interested in your opinions. We have heard all of this before, and we will hear it again and again until humanity ceases to exist.

.....OOC Anyways who cares this is a game....

User avatar
Shazbotdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9087
Founded: Sep 28, 2004
Anarchy

Postby Shazbotdom » Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:16 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Wayneactia wrote:No one cares. You are taking such an extreme stance, no one is interested in your opinions. We have heard all of this before, and we will hear it again and again until humanity ceases to exist.

.....OOC Anyways who cares this is a game....


OOC:
It seems interesting that you seem to be throwing a fit over it, then claim "it's just a game".

If it's just a game, why are you getting worked up over people not getting behind your rather poorly written proposal?
Last edited by Shazbotdom on Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Darth Bane/Darth Vader 2024 -- Together, we can Rule the Galaxy!
The Shazbotdom Empire || ShazWeb || Shazbotdom Military Information & History
IIWiki || Embassies v6.0 || Discord: YourDaddyShaz#0741
ShazAir || Shaz City International Airport || Shazbotdom News Corporation (News Thread)
Shazbert Bot's Gaming Adventures || PolyComp: E: -0.52 | S: -3.33 || WSPT: E: 100% | P: 100%

User avatar
Tsaivao
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: Apr 07, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Tsaivao » Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:28 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Wayneactia wrote:No one cares. You are taking such an extreme stance, no one is interested in your opinions. We have heard all of this before, and we will hear it again and again until humanity ceases to exist.

.....OOC Anyways who cares this is a game....

People would be more kind if you didn't just call everyone corrupt and crooked because we don't agree with your illegal proposal. I think I'm done here, as it's clear that the only feedback you really wanted was unconditional support rather than actual criticism, constructive or not.
~::~ May the five winds guide us to glory ~::~
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
Nation doesn't reflect my personal beliefs, NS stats aren't really worried about except for Nudity because "haha funny"
The symbol on my flag is supposed to be a typhoon
Pro: LGBT, BLM, Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Rationalism
Neutral: Gun Rights, Abortion, Centrism
Anti: Trumpism, Radicalization, Fundamentalism, Fascism

User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Texkentuck » Tue Jul 20, 2021 11:18 pm

Jedinsto wrote:
B: An abortion may only be proceeded when the mothers/child/uteri is in jeopardy

C: A child may not be aborted after conception because science states that it's human after that stage.

Hmm yes very consistent.

If this was actually well done and legal I might've supported it.

Edit: Well more like what I would have supported is something that guarantees women the right to an abortion when the pregnancy puts them in danger or she was raped, or other extreme circumstances, and a blocker of a full ban and a blocker of a full ban of banning abortion, but that's not what this is. Most of this proposal is a slab of shit.



Thank you and others ...If any of your nations want to repeal a bunch of stacked on proposals go for it............

User avatar
Wayneactia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wayneactia » Wed Jul 21, 2021 2:11 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Jedinsto wrote:Hmm yes very consistent.

If this was actually well done and legal I might've supported it.

Edit: Well more like what I would have supported is something that guarantees women the right to an abortion when the pregnancy puts them in danger or she was raped, or other extreme circumstances, and a blocker of a full ban and a blocker of a full ban of banning abortion, but that's not what this is. Most of this proposal is a slab of shit.



Thank you and others ...If any of your nations want to repeal a bunch of stacked on proposals go for it............

They really don't need your permission, or blessing.

User avatar
Jedinsto
Diplomat
 
Posts: 905
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Jedinsto » Wed Jul 21, 2021 2:14 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Jedinsto wrote:Hmm yes very consistent.

If this was actually well done and legal I might've supported it.

Edit: Well more like what I would have supported is something that guarantees women the right to an abortion when the pregnancy puts them in danger or she was raped, or other extreme circumstances, and a blocker of a full ban and a blocker of a full ban of banning abortion, but that's not what this is. Most of this proposal is a slab of shit.



Thank you and others ...If any of your nations want to repeal a bunch of stacked on proposals go for it............

I have no plans or interest in repealing anything written about abortion. For the purposes of the WA I can deal with abortion being always guaranteed, even if I find it immoral in most cases. And, the vastly pro-choice voter base would never allow a pro-life based repeal anyways.
Go approve Commend Imperium Anglorum
James DuBois
Working on- Against Quorum Raiding and Prison Reform Act.
Delegate of Cyrannus Star System, CNS writer, WA ministry staffer in TNP.
Authorships- GA#555, GA#558 and GA#563

User avatar
Texkentuck
Envoy
 
Posts: 304
Founded: Jan 17, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Texkentuck » Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:32 pm

Jedinsto wrote:
Texkentuck wrote:

Thank you and others ...If any of your nations want to repeal a bunch of stacked on proposals go for it............

I have no plans or interest in repealing anything written about abortion. For the purposes of the WA I can deal with abortion being always guaranteed, even if I find it immoral in most cases. And, the vastly pro-choice voter base would never allow a pro-life based repeal anyways.


All the proposals by nations such as yours are nothing more than slabs. Best vote ever is to not join the WA...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

User avatar
Refuge Isle
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Dec 14, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Refuge Isle » Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:43 pm

I can't say that I can recall another proposal that was as obsessed with a uterus as this one. Definitely a strange read, but more or less all of your posts are.

Texkentuck wrote:Child birth is natural and abortion is not.

Alternatively, dying at a life expectancy of 16 from environmental hazards is natural, debating in a legislative chamber is not.

Texkentuck wrote:A household without a mother because of such a sacrifice may lead to societies destruction.

As male gay couples have often wrought.

What holds your proposal back, aside from the understandable English rule, is that there aren't enough votes in the WA to support it. The last attempt to make leeway into the pro-life sphere lost the popular vote by around 70%. So repealing the resolutions that block what you want to do would be very unlikely, and passing a resolution that does the opposite thing is more unlikely than that.
Minister of Engagement, The South Pacific
Founder of Refugia, 4x WA Author, SPSF Officer

User avatar
Jedinsto
Diplomat
 
Posts: 905
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Jedinsto » Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:51 pm

Texkentuck wrote:
Jedinsto wrote:I have no plans or interest in repealing anything written about abortion. For the purposes of the WA I can deal with abortion being always guaranteed, even if I find it immoral in most cases. And, the vastly pro-choice voter base would never allow a pro-life based repeal anyways.


All the proposals by nations such as yours are nothing more than slabs. Best vote ever is to not join the WA...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

"Is 'slab' supposed to be an insult?"
Go approve Commend Imperium Anglorum
James DuBois
Working on- Against Quorum Raiding and Prison Reform Act.
Delegate of Cyrannus Star System, CNS writer, WA ministry staffer in TNP.
Authorships- GA#555, GA#558 and GA#563

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kurogasa, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads