I wrote this before and it clearly shows the inner workings of what I would like for the proposal to based from in the message below. that's fair for the WA and all nations by coming to the defense of the unborn and looking after the mothers and doctors... We need to base a proposal off of what I wrote in order to look after each party to the best of it's ability.
The question as to when the physical material dimension of a human being begins is strictly a scientific question, and fundamentally should be answered by human embryologists not by philosophers. During the process of fertilization, the sperm and the oocyte cease to exist as such, and a new human being is produced. Our nation stands with science... Also this proposal took away the rights of a doctor to make a choice not to do an abortion. My nation understand there is a clear difference between womens health and sheer practice of abortion. If the womens uterus is in jeopardy then it should be left up to the women. If we made a pro-life proposal that ignores the health of the women completely then that would be a proposal ruled by religion. We need proposals that defend the life of a child but also makes sure the women can have an abortion if the womens life is truly in jeopardy. Abortion is more dangerous of a procedure than child birth. Child birth is natural and abortion is not.
In Texkentuck most abortions are ilegal but if a women is notified by doctors that the child birth is dangerous or herself/ baby/uterus is in jeopardy during birth then the abortion would be allowed. If our nations laws went completely off religion the women would be forced to have a child. But even in religion just the act of forcing a women to make a sacrifice of herself or uterus takes away her basic religious decision to choose to sacrifice herself or her uterus for the purpose of giving life to her child.
Even God the Father let Jesus himself to make the decision to die for the sins of man when Christ didn't have too... In that case was virtuous. Because of that lesson it should be left up to the women when her life is in Jeopardy like Christs. But when it's just about sheer termination of a pregnancy it's more than just one women's life or health but the individual child with the basic gift of life which Texkentucks' constitution defends. It's virtuous whenever a women chooses to sacrifice herself for her child but the moment the state takes that away the virtue is lost and religious freedom is in jeapardy. But also if sheer abortions are allowed the Childs basic given rights are now also too in Jeopardy as well as God given right. Both must be defended....,Also if a women chooses to not sacrifice herself or her uterus for a child there is a reason which our governments and this WA has no right to judge because God's will may be for her to give birth to the next child or to be alive for her family sake...A household without a mother because of such a sacrifice may lead to societies destruction. God doesn't want for people to be stupid. There is a reason we have a mind, mouth, and eyes. This proposal is simply about the human rights of a doctor. No doctor should be forced to do an abortion because it's intruding on the rights of a doctor. Technically the women can find another doctors because of passed proposals of this WA. Technically this WA isn't concerned about the rights of individuals and values the right of the mother over everyones rights which isn't justice nor did it improve human rights. The WA nations who voted against keeping this proposal is illogical and simple minded. For that this WA has lowered itself on the civil rights spectrum in the oppinion of our nation Texkentuck.....
Simply this WA ignores the science that says it's a child and is totally rejecting the rights of a doctor. It's a human rights atrocity...Also in all civil rights cases there is always an oppressor with more rights than others...Technically and as horrible it sounds a women can do the abortion herself and in that case she's the opressor and the child is more and likely the victim.... As I've stated there are contraceptives that can be taken to terminate a pregnancy that is not late term. We aren't talking about tissue. Also if this proposal stays in place the doctors rights are respected and do to the pro-choice proposal in place by this WA the women can have a sheer abortion for just any reason. Which Texkentuck is against... This WA by removing a proposal to defend rights is a human rights atrocity and an attack on a doctors convictions of a religious, agnostic, athiest doctor that has some value to not terminate a life because science says it's a human...
Hope that this WA actually understands it's flaw and puts a good proposal in place....
From the Parliament of Texkentuck Monarchy Republic Federation...
President Bram W. Schirkophf
Texkentuck
