This battle, starting as early as 20 years ago from now (2021/5/10, The Time I writing this discussion), and starts with global companies wanting for more land for farms, oil palm plantations, timber etc. and through some sketchy and questionable land deals, they obtained their desired resources, especially land. Though proven to be a success, this followed its many tribes submitting complaints about Wide-spread fraud, corruption, environmental destruction, deforestation, and many allegations of violations of law. This started the long-time battle, as both tribes submit allegations and demand land be refunded while companies deny these allegations publicly and continue to advance their interests.
Following the beginning of this conflict, Companies were described as having an unfair advantage and throughout company purchases by wealthy businessman mostly by a Korean Man, they gained our 100 acres of land. What made the advantage more unfair is that the businessman sold the land at a large of about 50$ or above per acre and the tribes through corruption negotiations got like 1% of that price. When tribes refused or the company simply wanted more land, they burned forests with armed local forces supporting.
If your wondering, then thousands of journalists, news writers, documentary creators, or simply people who wanted to view this with their own eyes visited and researched the scene. Whatever side you take on this lopsided conflict, it marks something important both in economy and in the environmental sectors.
Here is when it comes to you. You have the choice to support neither sides, prove or disprove content in my words (I vouch for accuracy though a human is a human, no one is perfect ),research, or even just sit back and watch the drama play-out slowly in spans of years.
Following the beginning of this conflict, Companies were described as having an unfair advantage and throughout company purchases by wealthy businessman mostly by a Korean Man, they gained our 100 acres of land. What made the advantage more unfair is that the businessman sold the land at a large of about 50$ or above per acre and the tribes through corruption negotiations got like 1% of that price. When tribes refused or the company simply wanted more land, they burned forests with armed local forces supporting.
If your wondering, then thousands of journalists, news writers, documentary creators, or simply people who wanted to view this with their own eyes visited and researched the scene. Whatever side you take on this lopsided conflict, it marks something important both in economy and in the environmental sectors.
Here is when it comes to you. You have the choice to support neither sides, prove or disprove content in my words (I vouch for accuracy though a human is a human, no one is perfect ),research, or even just sit back and watch the drama play-out slowly in spans of years.