NATION

PASSWORD

(Draft) Decrease Illegal Immigration

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Traden
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 392
Founded: Nov 18, 2020
Ex-Nation

(Draft) Decrease Illegal Immigration

Postby Traden » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:31 am

The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.
Last edited by Traden on Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Current Member of SPSF (Tidal Force)

User avatar
Jedinsto
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1196
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedinsto » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:35 am

Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into a foreign country has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in the affected country.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

"Not an international issue. Opposed."

User avatar
Traden
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 392
Founded: Nov 18, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Traden » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:44 am

Jedinsto wrote:
Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into a foreign country has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in the affected country.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

"Not an international issue. Opposed."


Fixed. Is it better?
Current Member of SPSF (Tidal Force)

User avatar
Jedinsto
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1196
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedinsto » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:46 am

Traden wrote:
Jedinsto wrote:"Not an international issue. Opposed."


Fixed. Is it better?

What I mean is immigration laws, funding whatever border control you want, etc. is best handled by national government, not the General Assembly. Short answer- no.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15107
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:49 am

Why do you think this should be an international issue as opposed to one that individual states can easily handle?
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
Astrobolt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 508
Founded: Jul 30, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Astrobolt » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:50 am

Ambassador Tappe: "I fail to see any benefits that this proposal would create. Stopping 'illegal' immigration is not itself a virtue."

OOC: Clause D does not make sense.
Last edited by Astrobolt on Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delegate of the 10000 Islands
Ambassador to the WA: Mr. Reede Tappe

TITO Tactical Officer


For a detailed list of positions, and other things of note, click here.

User avatar
Graintfjall
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1860
Founded: Jun 30, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Graintfjall » Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:52 am

Just make illegal immigration illegal and magical compliance will take care of the rest.
Solo: IBC30, WCoH42, HWC25, U18WC16, CoH85, WJHC20
Co-host: CR36, BoF74, CoH80, BoF77, WC91
Champions: BoF73, CoH80, U18WC15, DBC52, WC91, CR41, VWE15, HWC27, EC15
Co-champions of the first and second Elephant Chess Cups with Bollonich
Runners-up: DBC49, EC10, HWC25, CR42
The White Winter Queendom of Græntfjall

User avatar
Ardiveds
Diplomat
 
Posts: 663
Founded: Feb 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardiveds » Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:11 am

"Ambassador, this is a national issue and should remain as such. We can't find anything to justify making such absurdly vague measures international law."
If the ambassador acts like an ambassador, it's probably Delegate Arthur.
If he acts like an edgy teen, it's probably definitely Delegate Jim.... it's always Jim

User avatar
Sierra Lyricalia
Senator
 
Posts: 4343
Founded: Nov 29, 2008
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sierra Lyricalia » Mon Apr 12, 2021 11:08 am

Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

"Yes, most often by national governments who ignore international law on the humane treatment of refugees and other migrants in order to satisfy their most ignorant and fearful citizens. But I get the feeling that's not really what you're talking about here."


Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

"Why would you be disgusted at the elimination of inefficiencies? Or more to the point, why should we be disgusted?"


Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

"Why would a country make immigration illegal? If you do that, people can't come open interesting new restaurants and taco trucks! More importantly, freedom of movement is as important to basic liberty as freedom of speech or ingestion. It ought to be curtailed as little as possible, and only then under careful consideration."


B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

Leo laughs hysterically for a few moments. A tear in his eye, he gasps, "Joke or draft proposals are debated in the other chamber, down the hall, sir. Seriously, you could do standup with that deadpan delivery."

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,
"Please, ambassador. When you assume you make an 'ass' of 'u' and 'me.'. Is this simple truth not taught in schools any longer?"




"Nah. In brief, Ambassador, we find this proposal pointless as well as vague. No support."
Principal-Agent, Anarchy; Squadron Admiral [fmr], The Red Fleet
The Semi-Honorable Leonid Berkman Pavonis
Author: 354 GA / Issues 436, 451, 724
Ambassador Pro Tem
Tech Level: Complicated (or not: 7/0/6 i.e. 12) / RP Details
.
Jerk, Ideological Deviant, Roach, MT Army stooge, & "red [who] do[es]n't read" (various)
.
Illustrious Bum #279


User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:38 pm

Purely out of morbid curiosity, how would my learned colleague from Traden define Illegal Immigration?
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15107
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:52 pm

Here's a more detailed critique of your rather ineffective draft:

The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

Often ignored by who?
Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

How is that a method?
Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

You can't eliminate illegal immigration. It will always happen as people from countries torn apart by war or other crises often want to go to richer and more stable countries for a better life.
B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

How does that "increasing of safety?"
Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

You haven't gotten any good reasoning for that.
Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

Does nothing. Also, illegal immigration can happen via air and water travel.
B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

Not very effective.
C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

Not very necessary.
D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

Not feasible.

Edit: I see you have already submitted it without even consulting a lot of the advice given from others. It's not a well-written resolution and it's not an issue for the GA to resolve.
Last edited by Outer Sparta on Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads