NATION

PASSWORD

[Passed] Repeal Digital Network Defence

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

[Passed] Repeal Digital Network Defence

Postby Honeydewistania » Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:37 pm

The World Assembly,

Observing this assembly’s dedication to protecting the privacy of the various citizens of World Assembly member nations, through resolutions such as “Data Protection Accord”, “Privacy Protection Act” and “Right to Secure Digital Communication”;

Concerned by the total lack of respect for personal privacy by “Digital Network Defense”, codifying the right of member nations to monitor their citizens’ digital footprint and allowing them to easily justify such an invasion of privacy by saying it was to monitor digital security threats, and by blocking future legislation from restricting their ability to do so; and

Realising that in order to restrict member nations from invading personal privacy willy-nilly through World Assembly legislation, “Digital Network Defence” must be repealed; hereby

Repeals “Digital Network Defense”.


grr grr grumble grumble
Last edited by Honeydewistania on Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13700
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:42 pm

Some random staffer: Can you imagine how close I was to writing a proposal thing requiring all member states to prohibit the formation of tornadoes on their soil except with most of the preamble being something to do with how bad the network defence thing is if you hadn't wrote this again, ambassador thing sir? WE, THE OMELETTE RIGHTY TINCANS, FERVENTLY SUPPORT YOUR REPEAL THING!!!!!
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:52 pm

Submitted.
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:22 am

"Still no."
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15107
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Thu Mar 25, 2021 10:39 am

Is it going to be marked legal without any legality challenges?
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Mar 25, 2021 10:40 am

Outer Sparta wrote:Is it going to be marked legal without any legality challenges?

Who knows? Will someone do the leg work to find something illegal? Broadly though, all Honeydewistania needs to do is cut off or rework the offending clause.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Otaku Stratus
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 119
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Otaku Stratus » Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:45 am

This site is a joke. Quick repeals of ridiculous things like this were the only thing that made the assembly tolerable.

User avatar
Goobergunchia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 2376
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Goobergunchia » Thu Apr 01, 2021 9:31 pm

The General Assembly proposal "Repeal "Digital Network Defense"" (by Saint Tomas and the Northern Ice Islands) entered the resolution voting floor.

User avatar
Vikanias
Minister
 
Posts: 2533
Founded: May 01, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Vikanias » Fri Apr 02, 2021 6:32 pm

Yesh
Luvs Jeshus, Hates the wife Susan, luvs footy, hates foreigners.
-British Geezer

YANKEE WITH NO BRIM :fire:

User avatar
Gran Serenissima
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Mar 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Gran Serenissima » Sat Apr 03, 2021 12:45 am

Why did DND pass in the first place if its loopholes were obvious enough to fit in a mere five paragraphs?
Nationstates newbie poking around.

"Lets have faith that right makes might; and in that faith let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it." - Abraham Lincoln

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Philimbesi » Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:06 am

Gran Serenissima wrote:Why did DND pass in the first place if its loopholes were obvious enough to fit in a mere five paragraphs?


While I can't speak with any first hand knowledge on the matter, I would suspect it has something to do with the catchy name as some of our honored ambassadors have problems with actually reading the resolution before voting for or against something.

Nigel S Youlkin,
USP Ambassador to the WA
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Scalizagasti
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 192
Founded: Jun 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Scalizagasti » Sat Apr 03, 2021 3:05 pm

The United Regions Alliance recommends that nations vote for this resolution. During internal voting, 14 regions voted in favour of this resolution, 0 regions voted against, and 1 region abstained.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1527942
Scalizagasti | iiwiki page | he/him

URA WA Affairs Department Head
Senator in Mariner Trench
Former President of The Great Experiment

Don't let them tell you it can't be done - Jack Layton

User avatar
Ackuzay
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Jul 12, 2007
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Ackuzay » Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:10 am

Gran Serenissima wrote:Why did DND pass in the first place if its loopholes were obvious enough to fit in a mere five paragraphs?



It seems to me that any resolution that goes up to vote has a high likelyhood to pass.
Think of it as a letter.

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:02 pm

Repeal "Digital Network Defense" was passed 11,964 votes to 2,753.
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads