NATION

PASSWORD

When Harry Met Meghan

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25672
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

When Harry Met Meghan

Postby Australian rePublic » Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:25 am

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/m ... allout.amp
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/meg ... 431af/amp/
https://amp.news.com.au/entertainment/c ... 1b66457ce6

Ok, so as you most likely already know, since Megxit, there has been a lot of controversy surrounding Prince of the UK- Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle. However, as you moat likely already know, the tensions and controversies have increased, ever since Harry and Meghan's controversial interview with Operah Winfrey. Where she alleges, amongst other things, that the British royal family are racist and were concerned about the colour of her baby. Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America, stating that if Joe Biden were to only serve one term, she would like to run after him as the Democrat president in 2024.

I am yet to watch the Operah interview, but I have recorded it and will watch it when I have the time. I don't know how to feel about the racism allegations. It's very possible that the comments about the baby's skin colour were taken out of context, I don't know. I have to see the interview to see exactly what she said. I don't think it was nice of her to air all the dirty laundry of the royal family, and it's a bit unfair for her to demand a title for Archie. I know he won't get the royal protection, but it's not like they can't afford it. Also, the British monarchy has very, very strict rules against any of its members publically getting involved in politics, so it'll be fun to see how Meghan's presidental bid plays out. I'll be grabbingy popcorn. That's all from me. What do you guys think of the matter?
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
I would love to commission infrastructure in Australia. If anyone knows how I, as a lay person, could do so, please TG me. I'm dead serious
We're closer in time to 2050 than 1950

Wonderful Song Quotes

18 Published Issues, 1 Published WA Resolution

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17454
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:11 am

The Daily Mail dedicated a lengthy piece to dispute false or misleading claims from the interview – then separately predicted the Duchess of Sussex might run for U.S. president in 2024, citing an unnamed British Labour Party official.

Honestly I give very little credence to any reporting about the royal family. especially from the Daily Mail. A lot of this is down to the fact she sued and won a case against the Daily Mail, the temerity..

Like, nearly everything being stated is wrong, she didn't say a member of the royal family asked about colour, but someone in the household.. and frankly the royal family are mostly racist as fuck so it's hardly a surprise anyway - just google some of Prince Phillip's quotes.

It's like Diana died and the media have been waiting for their new scandalous member, always female.. they could go a little more into Prince Andrew and his shenanigans for scandal, they just prefer a female victim.

As if anyone should care in the first place, they're a vastly privileged family who've done fuck all to receive the attention they do - not being able to open a news page without Meghan splashed across it has annoyed me this past week or so.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54738
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:15 am

Just take them to the Tower and be done with them.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:16 am

Time for another glorious revolution.

It would also nearly get rid of our royal family if they're occupied with island matters :)
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126453
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:27 am

Americans have a weird fascination with the British royal family and Meghan is no exception. She had the dream of being a princess as a child. But I don't think she understood the personal costs in terms of lack of liberty and freedom.


All that said I find Harry and Meghan as a couple awful. What they did was calculated and a little bit cruel. It was one big "oohhh feel sad for me, I have been hurt", and seriously if the worst thing they have is someone of the household snipped about thr color of thr baby, that's not much. Folks got killed for being black.... and your whining about the horrors of one line about the baby being dark?


Fuck it i would disown them too.
Last edited by Ethel mermania on Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Kenzo-Cyprii
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Mar 15, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:48 am

Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America,

Meghan Markle as POTUS? And here I thought Kanye West was as stupid as it could get...

I don't know how to feel about the racism allegations. It's very possible that the comments about the baby's skin colour were taken out of context, I don't know.


I’m not even going to speculate on the allegations of color of questioning the color of the baby’s skin. But she comes off to me as the hypersensitive type. She always has. I mean I don’t care for Piers Morgan myself but the fact that he simply voiced his opinion (regardless of how rude it may or may not have been) and her response is to go run and file a complaint...

Putting it bluntly (IMO), she thought she could take her fast life American Hollywood privilege (along with a few other things) and come into England’s royal family and overturn centuries of tradition while wearing a pair of “deal with it” shades. The crumpet didn’t crumble that way and so now - on par with what America has become - she’s leading a smear campaign against against the royal family.
Last edited by Kenzo-Cyprii on Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
A Ka Dua
So it is written. So it shall be.
Pharaoh’s Banner

OOC
Cynical yob.
King of Oofs.
”Don’t be too sensitive that you can’t take a harsh word from anyone.”
-Harika budi

User avatar
Great Pacific Switzerland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 577
Founded: Jan 14, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Pacific Switzerland » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:03 am

When is the queen gonna order another car ride?
In a democracy, I'm what you'd call a conservative socialist. In an ideal world, a Socialist/Gaddafist/Marxist-Leninist gov works out for me

Pro: Socialism, Isolationism, Third Universal Theory, Militarism, Nuclear Power, Guns, Nationalism
Against: Neo-Liberalism, LGBT politics, Wage cuckery, "Moderate-Conservatives", Zionism, Liberal-Democracy

-Napoleon Bonaparte
-Josip Broz Tito
-Mummar Al-Gaddafi
-Gamal Abdel Nasser
-Christopher Lasch
-Bashar Al-Assad
-Donald J. Trump

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17454
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:04 am

Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America,

Meghan Markle as POTUS? And here I thought Kanye West was as stupid as it could get...

I don't know how to feel about the racism allegations. It's very possible that the comments about the baby's skin colour were taken out of context, I don't know.


I’m not even going to speculate on the allegations of color of questioning the color of the baby’s skin. But she comes off to me as the hypersensitive type. She always has. I mean I don’t care for Piers Morgan myself but the fact that he simply voiced his opinion (regardless of how rude it may or may not have been) and her response is to go run and file a complaint...

Putting it bluntly (IMO), she thought she could take her fast life American Hollywood privilege (along with a few other things) and come into England’s royal family and overturn centuries of tradition while wearing a pair of “deal with it” shades. The crumpet didn’t crumble that way and so now - on par with what America has become - she’s leading a smear campaign against against the royal family.


1. The claim she wants to run for President comes from an unnamed British Labour politician.. ri-ght.. this is the sort of baseless bullshit put across as fact that is often done with any member of the Royal Family. There was a segment on Jim Kramer where he talked about spreading rumour about Apple to drive stock price because Apple rarely responded to rumours.. it's the same with the Royal Family, just print any old shit, it'll drive clicks
2. Did you see the Piers Morgan segment.. he was an incredible baby, he questioned her claims on the state of her mental health as lies, and when someone challenged him on that he got up and walked off his own show.. pathetic.
3. Maybe.. I just don't see the protocols of the Royal Family as anything special or privileged, fuck 'em, the aristocratic method of concealing all and any emotions has led to a lot of fucked up history.

I don't care for Meghan and Harry, I don't much care for the royal family, what I do care about is the seemingly free rein of the media to trash, denigrate, lie about anyone or anything related to the royal family as it's seemingly free click-bait.

And the danger is that people like Prince Andrew likely indulged in some pretty dark stuff, is he in jail like near any ordinary person would be.. no, because the royal family is like some long running soap opera that you might talk about over the water cooler but, hey, it's not real people with real consequences of feelings.

So write what you want to write about them, Meghan eats babies for breakfast, it's all fodder.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Great Brytain and Ireland
Attaché
 
Posts: 76
Founded: Oct 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Brytain and Ireland » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:11 am

Meghan should quit being salty and accept that she isn’t fit for royalty - I can’t name a single person in the US who would be, let alone someone who’s embedded in Hollywood culture. Frankly, the sooner she and everyone else shuts up, and they can shrink into the privacy they supposedly desire, the happier I and many others will be.

No doubt she’s rewording things to fit her agenda. She’s playing the victim because she couldn’t handle the responsibilities nor had as much attention as she wanted.
Homepage
Dispatches
Newsletter
The Author
| The United Kingdom :: “Deus Benedicat”
The UK but with a competent government - and vampires.
#FreePalpatine
| BBC | Investigation into the murder of retired vampire minister Sir Lorenzo Clarke turns up few leads, “we’re dealing with a clearly calculated assassination,” say lead investigators.

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17454
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:15 am

Great Brytain and Ireland wrote:Meghan should quit being salty and accept that she isn’t fit for royalty - I can’t name a single person in the US who would be, let alone someone who’s embedded in Hollywood culture. Frankly, the sooner she and everyone else shuts up, and they can shrink into the privacy they supposedly desire, the happier I and many others will be.

No doubt she’s rewording things to fit her agenda. She’s playing the victim because she couldn’t handle the responsibilities nor had as much attention as she wanted.


How about the royal family stop being so immune to showing emotion and a little less incestuous rather than asking an individual to mould into their arcane and aloof practices.

What the fuck is so special about them that everyone needs to obey their rules when dealing with them? I can't turn my back on the Queen, why not?

When Adam delved and Eve span, who then was the gentleman?
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58254
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:36 am

The UK media treated her like shit compared to other members of the royal family, a good example is Kate Middleton (and there are tonnes of headline comparisons floating on the internet to show the difference in how they treated her) and it wouldnt surprise me if there is some truth to what she says about how she was treated by the royal family. And i can understand why Harry backs her soo much given his own personal history with UK media and his mother.

Other than that i dont care too much.

edit: and if she does wana run for president then lol good luck to her, that aint happening.
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Kenzo-Cyprii
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Mar 15, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:50 am

Bombadil wrote:
Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:Meghan Markle as POTUS? And here I thought Kanye West was as stupid as it could get...



I’m not even going to speculate on the allegations of color of questioning the color of the baby’s skin. But she comes off to me as the hypersensitive type. She always has. I mean I don’t care for Piers Morgan myself but the fact that he simply voiced his opinion (regardless of how rude it may or may not have been) and her response is to go run and file a complaint...

Putting it bluntly (IMO), she thought she could take her fast life American Hollywood privilege (along with a few other things) and come into England’s royal family and overturn centuries of tradition while wearing a pair of “deal with it” shades. The crumpet didn’t crumble that way and so now - on par with what America has become - she’s leading a smear campaign against against the royal family.


1. The claim she wants to run for President comes from an unnamed British Labour politician.. ri-ght.. this is the sort of baseless bullshit put across as fact that is often done with any member of the Royal Family. There was a segment on Jim Kramer where he talked about spreading rumour about Apple to drive stock price because Apple rarely responded to rumours.. it's the same with the Royal Family, just print any old shit, it'll drive clicks
2. Did you see the Piers Morgan segment.. he was an incredible baby, he questioned her claims on the state of her mental health as lies, and when someone challenged him on that he got up and walked off his own show.. pathetic.
3. Maybe.. I just don't see the protocols of the Royal Family as anything special or privileged, fuck 'em, the aristocratic method of concealing all and any emotions has led to a lot of fucked up history.

I don't care for Meghan and Harry, I don't much care for the royal family, what I do care about is the seemingly free rein of the media to trash, denigrate, lie about anyone or anything related to the royal family as it's seemingly free click-bait.

And the danger is that people like Prince Andrew likely indulged in some pretty dark stuff, is he in jail like near any ordinary person would be.. no, because the royal family is like some long running soap opera that you might talk about over the water cooler but, hey, it's not real people with real consequences of feelings.

So write what you want to write about them, Meghan eats babies for breakfast, it's all fodder.


1. Regardless it’s irrelevant really. Besides, Biden’s presidency is only kicking off. We have four years and then, well... even if she wanted to run a serious campaign she wouldn’t win. She wouldn’t even garner enough Democrat support to make the primary. Moot and-or unlikely as it may be, it doesn’t prevent it from being a stupid concept to even be entertained.
2. Regardless. He did so within the realm of freedom of speech. And if he was being the self-embarrassing baby why did she even bother filing complaints and egging to get him off the show? It was a cheap “got ‘eem” for self satisfaction. A tactic of an excessively petty or oversensitive person.
3. I’m not really sure what to say to that. But I will say I’m not someone who’s a subscriber to the Royal Family Weekly. Frankly, to quote someone else America alone has a weird obsession with the royal family, and really in the end they are merely a symbol of history and traditionalism.

And to me, they and the centuries of tradition deserve a degree of respect. Of course that’s just me. I’m not saying they are gods or embodiments of human perfection, definitely not. But still, Markle is a shifty controversial type and she came into the family fresh out of the “I am a god” Hollywood environment. To repeat what I said, all song and dance aside, I maintain that she is exaggerating on her claims. The degree of exaggeration I cannot say. But she couldn’t adapt to the environment of royalty and now she cuts interviews with Oprah to attention monger and sling mud.
Last edited by Kenzo-Cyprii on Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
A Ka Dua
So it is written. So it shall be.
Pharaoh’s Banner

OOC
Cynical yob.
King of Oofs.
”Don’t be too sensitive that you can’t take a harsh word from anyone.”
-Harika budi

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:57 am

Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
1. The claim she wants to run for President comes from an unnamed British Labour politician.. ri-ght.. this is the sort of baseless bullshit put across as fact that is often done with any member of the Royal Family. There was a segment on Jim Kramer where he talked about spreading rumour about Apple to drive stock price because Apple rarely responded to rumours.. it's the same with the Royal Family, just print any old shit, it'll drive clicks
2. Did you see the Piers Morgan segment.. he was an incredible baby, he questioned her claims on the state of her mental health as lies, and when someone challenged him on that he got up and walked off his own show.. pathetic.
3. Maybe.. I just don't see the protocols of the Royal Family as anything special or privileged, fuck 'em, the aristocratic method of concealing all and any emotions has led to a lot of fucked up history.

I don't care for Meghan and Harry, I don't much care for the royal family, what I do care about is the seemingly free rein of the media to trash, denigrate, lie about anyone or anything related to the royal family as it's seemingly free click-bait.

And the danger is that people like Prince Andrew likely indulged in some pretty dark stuff, is he in jail like near any ordinary person would be.. no, because the royal family is like some long running soap opera that you might talk about over the water cooler but, hey, it's not real people with real consequences of feelings.

So write what you want to write about them, Meghan eats babies for breakfast, it's all fodder.


1. Regardless it’s irrelevant really. Besides, Biden’s presidency is only kicking off. We have four years and then, well... even if she wanted to run a serious campaign she wouldn’t win. She wouldn’t even garner enough Democrat support to make the primary. Moot and-or unlikely as it may be, it doesn’t prevent it from being a stupid concept to even be entertained.
2. Regardless. He did so within the realm of freedom of speech. And if he was being the self-embarrassing baby why did she even bother filing complaints and egging to get him off the show? It was a cheap “got ‘eem” for self satisfaction. A tactic of an excessively petty or oversensitive person.
3. I’m not really sure what to say to that. But I will say I’m not someone who’s a subscriber to the Royal Family Weekly. Frankly, to quote someone else America alone has a weird obsession with the royal family, and really in the end they are merely a symbol of history and traditionalism.

And to me, they and the centuries of tradition deserve a degree of respect. Of course that’s just me. I’m not saying they are gods or embodiments of human perfection, definitely not. But still, Markle is a shifty controversial type and she came into the family fresh out of the “I am a god” Hollywood environment. To repeat what I said, all song and dance aside, I maintain that she is exaggerating on her claims. The degree of exaggeration I cannot say. But she couldn’t adapt to the environment of royalty and now she cuts interviews with Oprah to attention monger and sling mud.


Why are you assuming she runs as a Democrat?

Maybe she'll run as a republican.

Would be a nice, a republican royal :)
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Federation of American States
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: May 29, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Federation of American States » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:57 am

Megan is a B**** and Harry is a emasculated wimp. What's else is new ?

But seriously the royal family should of added a rule Banning the marriage of American
Divorcees after the frist disaster in the 1930s.

Or perhaps America should Ban citizens form Marrying into foreign nobility. Like it's supposed to according to
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.
Both sides of the pond dropped the Ball on this.
An alternative universes equivalent to the United States. Where the Timeline Diverged sometime in the 18th-19th Century.

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=federation_of_american_states/detail=factbook/id=1381198

I don't use NS stats. I use modern America as a baseline .

User avatar
Kenzo-Cyprii
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Mar 15, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:07 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
1. Regardless it’s irrelevant really. Besides, Biden’s presidency is only kicking off. We have four years and then, well... even if she wanted to run a serious campaign she wouldn’t win. She wouldn’t even garner enough Democrat support to make the primary. Moot and-or unlikely as it may be, it doesn’t prevent it from being a stupid concept to even be entertained.
2. Regardless. He did so within the realm of freedom of speech. And if he was being the self-embarrassing baby why did she even bother filing complaints and egging to get him off the show? It was a cheap “got ‘eem” for self satisfaction. A tactic of an excessively petty or oversensitive person.
3. I’m not really sure what to say to that. But I will say I’m not someone who’s a subscriber to the Royal Family Weekly. Frankly, to quote someone else America alone has a weird obsession with the royal family, and really in the end they are merely a symbol of history and traditionalism.

And to me, they and the centuries of tradition deserve a degree of respect. Of course that’s just me. I’m not saying they are gods or embodiments of human perfection, definitely not. But still, Markle is a shifty controversial type and she came into the family fresh out of the “I am a god” Hollywood environment. To repeat what I said, all song and dance aside, I maintain that she is exaggerating on her claims. The degree of exaggeration I cannot say. But she couldn’t adapt to the environment of royalty and now she cuts interviews with Oprah to attention monger and sling mud.


Why are you assuming she runs as a Democrat?

Maybe she'll run as a republican.

Would be a nice, a republican royal :)


I mean I think that’s a safe assumption (her running as a Dem IF she even ran). From what little I know of her as far as personal values and dispositions I don’t really see her as a Republican. Meghan Markle assuming the Republican sash post Trumpius Minimus? I don’t see it.
A Ka Dua
So it is written. So it shall be.
Pharaoh’s Banner

OOC
Cynical yob.
King of Oofs.
”Don’t be too sensitive that you can’t take a harsh word from anyone.”
-Harika budi

User avatar
Nova Vandalia
Envoy
 
Posts: 323
Founded: Jan 19, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Vandalia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:11 am

Federation of American States wrote:Or perhaps America should Ban citizens form Marrying into foreign nobility. Like it's supposed to according to
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.
Both sides of the pond dropped the Ball on this.


UH... Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 says:

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Which Prohibits the U.S. from creating Nobility titles and prohibits only Federal Governmental officials from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies. So no we're not supposed to ban people from doing that, just Federal Government Officials can't without the consent of Congress and last time I checked Meghan Markle wasn't a member of the Federal Government.
If my tone is coming off as a little harsh, please call me out on it, I rarely mean to come off that way.

Be Ruthless to Systems, Be Kind to People.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126453
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:13 am

Nova Vandalia wrote:
Federation of American States wrote:Or perhaps America should Ban citizens form Marrying into foreign nobility. Like it's supposed to according to
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.
Both sides of the pond dropped the Ball on this.


UH... Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 says:

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Which Prohibits the U.S. from creating Nobility titles and prohibits only Federal Governmental officials from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies. So no we're not supposed to ban people from doing that, just Federal Government Officials can't without the consent of Congress and last time I checked Meghan Markle wasn't a member of the Federal Government.

You mean Hollywood doesn't hold a special position of trust in America?? Save me people magazine, save me.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
The Jamesian Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13862
Founded: Apr 28, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Jamesian Republic » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:14 am

Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America


That would be interesting. I doubt many people would even consider her as president since she is part of the Royal Family and I don’t think Americans would someone from the British monarchy as president.

User avatar
Borderlands of Rojava
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14813
Founded: Jul 27, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Borderlands of Rojava » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:17 am

Oh great let's have another celebrity president with zero experience in governing. Yeah that'll totally be an awesome idea.
Leftist, commie and Antifa Guy. Democratic Confederalist, Anti-racist

"The devil is out there. Hiding behind every corner and in every nook and cranny. In all of the dives, all over the city. Before you lays an entire world of enemies, and at day's end when the chips are down, we're a society of strangers. You cant walk by someone on the street anymore without crossing the road to get away from their stare. Welcome to the Twilight Zone. The land of plague and shadow. Nothing innocent survives this world. If it can't corrupt you, it'll kill you."

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66751
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:25 am

All this because she snubbed Piers Morgan and he couldn't take it.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Galimencia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 390
Founded: Mar 15, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Galimencia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:25 am

Let's be very honest,most of us agree that Meghan became Meghan,because she married Prince Harry.You know,Meghan would have been just another pretty Hollywood actress,about whom people would talk for one or two years and then would completely forget about her existence.All of us know,and recognize Meghan Markel today as a member of the British Royal Family,and not as an actress.First of all,Meghan is incapable of achieving anything in her own right,so she married Harry to be recognised,to get the fame,that she doesn't deserves.To me,she is a gold-digger and her recent comments in the Oprah Winfrey show is a cheap,pathetic publicity stunt.Most Hollywood folks do such publicity stunts(except a few like Di Caprio and Emma Watson),so I am not at all angry on seeing Meghan,coming up with such rubbish accusations against the British Royal.But,I am ashamed of Prince Harry,for what he is doing,and how he is presenting his own family in front of the entire world.This is simply disappointing and heat breaking.
From the user behind Sannyamathland and Magnecia.

An alt history early 20th century Britain, which has managed to survive well into the 21st century while keeping hold of all it's colonies(mostly). Co-Founder of IPDA, Member of CUSP. Permanent member of UN Security Council.
A military superpower.

NS Stats are not canon.

#FreeRojava

OOC Notice: Flag to be updated soon. The current one is definetely not the official flag of the country.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66751
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:30 am

Galimencia wrote:Let's be very honest,most of us agree that Meghan became Meghan,because she married Prince Harry.You know,Meghan would have been just another pretty Hollywood actress,about whom people would talk for one or two years and then would completely forget about her existence.All of us know,and recognize Meghan Markel today as a member of the British Royal Family,and not as an actress.First of all,Meghan is incapable of achieving anything in her own right,so she married Harry to be recognised,to get the fame,that she doesn't deserves.To me,she is a gold-digger and her recent comments in the Oprah Winfrey show is a cheap,pathetic publicity stunt.Most Hollywood folks do such publicity stunts(except a few like Di Caprio and Emma Watson),so I am not at all angry on seeing Meghan,coming up with such rubbish accusations against the British Royal.But,I am ashamed of Prince Harry,for what he is doing,and how he is presenting his own family in front of the entire world.This is simply disappointing and heat breaking.


And what makes them rubbish accusations?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Silvedania
Minister
 
Posts: 3161
Founded: Apr 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Silvedania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:34 am

Did the Oprah interview say that she was going to run for prez? Cuz if it didn't which source did? I'd like to find which of them is publishing fake news.
Silvedania, the majestic nation.
NS Stats are mostly accurate except for a few things, like this nation is capitalist and the death penalty isn't in effect

News:All trade with Crabaiaia and Pikala has stopped as diplomats meet in Trenaka.  Silvedanians are confused by Quentin Tarantulatino's new film, Seasonal Snackbox(This is a Bojack Horseman reference.) Weird song goes viral for making no sense.

Co-founder of LITA | Member of ICDN | Former Member of SETA | Member of IFTC | He/Him/His | Airport: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=493569#p37851012
Being president looks like the worst job in the world. -John Mulaney

User avatar
Kenzo-Cyprii
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Mar 15, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:41 am

Silvedania wrote:Did the Oprah interview say that she was going to run for prez? Cuz if it didn't which source did? I'd like to find which of them is publishing fake news.


I googled “meghan markle president” and here are some of what I got;

Page Six
Republic World
Mirror
Nine


Well, these are a few of the ones that have it openly suggested in their articles titles.
Last edited by Kenzo-Cyprii on Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
A Ka Dua
So it is written. So it shall be.
Pharaoh’s Banner

OOC
Cynical yob.
King of Oofs.
”Don’t be too sensitive that you can’t take a harsh word from anyone.”
-Harika budi

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66751
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:43 am

Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
Silvedania wrote:Did the Oprah interview say that she was going to run for prez? Cuz if it didn't which source did? I'd like to find which of them is publishing fake news.


I googled “meghan markle president” and here are some of what I got;

Page Six
Republic World
Mirror
Nine


Well, these are a few of the ones that have it openly suggested in their articles titles.


And what do they cite as the source for her saying she wants to?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Bombadil, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Philjia, Point Blob, Port Caverton, Squidward Town, Tarsonis, The Grand Fifth Imperium, Valles Marineris Mining co, Vistulange, Vivida Vis Animi

Advertisement

Remove ads