
by Australian rePublic » Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:25 am
by Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:11 am

by Risottia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:15 am

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:16 am


by Ethel mermania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:27 am

by Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:48 am
Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America,
I don't know how to feel about the racism allegations. It's very possible that the comments about the baby's skin colour were taken out of context, I don't know.

by Great Pacific Switzerland » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:03 am
by Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:04 am
Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America,
Meghan Markle as POTUS? And here I thought Kanye West was as stupid as it could get...I don't know how to feel about the racism allegations. It's very possible that the comments about the baby's skin colour were taken out of context, I don't know.
I’m not even going to speculate on the allegations of color of questioning the color of the baby’s skin. But she comes off to me as the hypersensitive type. She always has. I mean I don’t care for Piers Morgan myself but the fact that he simply voiced his opinion (regardless of how rude it may or may not have been) and her response is to go run and file a complaint...
Putting it bluntly (IMO), she thought she could take her fast life American Hollywood privilege (along with a few other things) and come into England’s royal family and overturn centuries of tradition while wearing a pair of “deal with it” shades. The crumpet didn’t crumble that way and so now - on par with what America has become - she’s leading a smear campaign against against the royal family.

by Great Brytain and Ireland » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:11 am
Homepage
Dispatches
Newsletter
The Author
| BBC | Investigation into the murder of retired vampire minister Sir Lorenzo Clarke turns up few leads, “we’re dealing with a clearly calculated assassination,” say lead investigators.
by Bombadil » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:15 am
Great Brytain and Ireland wrote:Meghan should quit being salty and accept that she isn’t fit for royalty - I can’t name a single person in the US who would be, let alone someone who’s embedded in Hollywood culture. Frankly, the sooner she and everyone else shuts up, and they can shrink into the privacy they supposedly desire, the happier I and many others will be.
No doubt she’s rewording things to fit her agenda. She’s playing the victim because she couldn’t handle the responsibilities nor had as much attention as she wanted.

by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:36 am

by Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:50 am
Bombadil wrote:Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:Meghan Markle as POTUS? And here I thought Kanye West was as stupid as it could get...
I’m not even going to speculate on the allegations of color of questioning the color of the baby’s skin. But she comes off to me as the hypersensitive type. She always has. I mean I don’t care for Piers Morgan myself but the fact that he simply voiced his opinion (regardless of how rude it may or may not have been) and her response is to go run and file a complaint...
Putting it bluntly (IMO), she thought she could take her fast life American Hollywood privilege (along with a few other things) and come into England’s royal family and overturn centuries of tradition while wearing a pair of “deal with it” shades. The crumpet didn’t crumble that way and so now - on par with what America has become - she’s leading a smear campaign against against the royal family.
1. The claim she wants to run for President comes from an unnamed British Labour politician.. ri-ght.. this is the sort of baseless bullshit put across as fact that is often done with any member of the Royal Family. There was a segment on Jim Kramer where he talked about spreading rumour about Apple to drive stock price because Apple rarely responded to rumours.. it's the same with the Royal Family, just print any old shit, it'll drive clicks
2. Did you see the Piers Morgan segment.. he was an incredible baby, he questioned her claims on the state of her mental health as lies, and when someone challenged him on that he got up and walked off his own show.. pathetic.
3. Maybe.. I just don't see the protocols of the Royal Family as anything special or privileged, fuck 'em, the aristocratic method of concealing all and any emotions has led to a lot of fucked up history.
I don't care for Meghan and Harry, I don't much care for the royal family, what I do care about is the seemingly free rein of the media to trash, denigrate, lie about anyone or anything related to the royal family as it's seemingly free click-bait.
And the danger is that people like Prince Andrew likely indulged in some pretty dark stuff, is he in jail like near any ordinary person would be.. no, because the royal family is like some long running soap opera that you might talk about over the water cooler but, hey, it's not real people with real consequences of feelings.
So write what you want to write about them, Meghan eats babies for breakfast, it's all fodder.

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:57 am
Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:Bombadil wrote:
1. The claim she wants to run for President comes from an unnamed British Labour politician.. ri-ght.. this is the sort of baseless bullshit put across as fact that is often done with any member of the Royal Family. There was a segment on Jim Kramer where he talked about spreading rumour about Apple to drive stock price because Apple rarely responded to rumours.. it's the same with the Royal Family, just print any old shit, it'll drive clicks
2. Did you see the Piers Morgan segment.. he was an incredible baby, he questioned her claims on the state of her mental health as lies, and when someone challenged him on that he got up and walked off his own show.. pathetic.
3. Maybe.. I just don't see the protocols of the Royal Family as anything special or privileged, fuck 'em, the aristocratic method of concealing all and any emotions has led to a lot of fucked up history.
I don't care for Meghan and Harry, I don't much care for the royal family, what I do care about is the seemingly free rein of the media to trash, denigrate, lie about anyone or anything related to the royal family as it's seemingly free click-bait.
And the danger is that people like Prince Andrew likely indulged in some pretty dark stuff, is he in jail like near any ordinary person would be.. no, because the royal family is like some long running soap opera that you might talk about over the water cooler but, hey, it's not real people with real consequences of feelings.
So write what you want to write about them, Meghan eats babies for breakfast, it's all fodder.
1. Regardless it’s irrelevant really. Besides, Biden’s presidency is only kicking off. We have four years and then, well... even if she wanted to run a serious campaign she wouldn’t win. She wouldn’t even garner enough Democrat support to make the primary. Moot and-or unlikely as it may be, it doesn’t prevent it from being a stupid concept to even be entertained.
2. Regardless. He did so within the realm of freedom of speech. And if he was being the self-embarrassing baby why did she even bother filing complaints and egging to get him off the show? It was a cheap “got ‘eem” for self satisfaction. A tactic of an excessively petty or oversensitive person.
3. I’m not really sure what to say to that. But I will say I’m not someone who’s a subscriber to the Royal Family Weekly. Frankly, to quote someone else America alone has a weird obsession with the royal family, and really in the end they are merely a symbol of history and traditionalism.
And to me, they and the centuries of tradition deserve a degree of respect. Of course that’s just me. I’m not saying they are gods or embodiments of human perfection, definitely not. But still, Markle is a shifty controversial type and she came into the family fresh out of the “I am a god” Hollywood environment. To repeat what I said, all song and dance aside, I maintain that she is exaggerating on her claims. The degree of exaggeration I cannot say. But she couldn’t adapt to the environment of royalty and now she cuts interviews with Oprah to attention monger and sling mud.


by Federation of American States » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:57 am

by Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:07 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
1. Regardless it’s irrelevant really. Besides, Biden’s presidency is only kicking off. We have four years and then, well... even if she wanted to run a serious campaign she wouldn’t win. She wouldn’t even garner enough Democrat support to make the primary. Moot and-or unlikely as it may be, it doesn’t prevent it from being a stupid concept to even be entertained.
2. Regardless. He did so within the realm of freedom of speech. And if he was being the self-embarrassing baby why did she even bother filing complaints and egging to get him off the show? It was a cheap “got ‘eem” for self satisfaction. A tactic of an excessively petty or oversensitive person.
3. I’m not really sure what to say to that. But I will say I’m not someone who’s a subscriber to the Royal Family Weekly. Frankly, to quote someone else America alone has a weird obsession with the royal family, and really in the end they are merely a symbol of history and traditionalism.
And to me, they and the centuries of tradition deserve a degree of respect. Of course that’s just me. I’m not saying they are gods or embodiments of human perfection, definitely not. But still, Markle is a shifty controversial type and she came into the family fresh out of the “I am a god” Hollywood environment. To repeat what I said, all song and dance aside, I maintain that she is exaggerating on her claims. The degree of exaggeration I cannot say. But she couldn’t adapt to the environment of royalty and now she cuts interviews with Oprah to attention monger and sling mud.
Why are you assuming she runs as a Democrat?
Maybe she'll run as a republican.
Would be a nice, a republican royal

by Nova Vandalia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:11 am
Federation of American States wrote:Or perhaps America should Ban citizens form Marrying into foreign nobility. Like it's supposed to according to
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.
Both sides of the pond dropped the Ball on this.

by Ethel mermania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:13 am
Nova Vandalia wrote:Federation of American States wrote:Or perhaps America should Ban citizens form Marrying into foreign nobility. Like it's supposed to according to
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.
Both sides of the pond dropped the Ball on this.
UH... Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 says:
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
Which Prohibits the U.S. from creating Nobility titles and prohibits only Federal Governmental officials from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies. So no we're not supposed to ban people from doing that, just Federal Government Officials can't without the consent of Congress and last time I checked Meghan Markle wasn't a member of the Federal Government.

by The Jamesian Republic » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:14 am
Now, Meghan wants to run for President of the United States of America

by Borderlands of Rojava » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:17 am

by Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:25 am

by Galimencia » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:25 am

by Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:30 am
Galimencia wrote:Let's be very honest,most of us agree that Meghan became Meghan,because she married Prince Harry.You know,Meghan would have been just another pretty Hollywood actress,about whom people would talk for one or two years and then would completely forget about her existence.All of us know,and recognize Meghan Markel today as a member of the British Royal Family,and not as an actress.First of all,Meghan is incapable of achieving anything in her own right,so she married Harry to be recognised,to get the fame,that she doesn't deserves.To me,she is a gold-digger and her recent comments in the Oprah Winfrey show is a cheap,pathetic publicity stunt.Most Hollywood folks do such publicity stunts(except a few like Di Caprio and Emma Watson),so I am not at all angry on seeing Meghan,coming up with such rubbish accusations against the British Royal.But,I am ashamed of Prince Harry,for what he is doing,and how he is presenting his own family in front of the entire world.This is simply disappointing and heat breaking.

by Silvedania » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:34 am
News:All trade with Crabaiaia and Pikala has stopped as diplomats meet in Trenaka. Silvedanians are confused by Quentin Tarantulatino's new film, Seasonal Snackbox(This is a Bojack Horseman reference.) Weird song goes viral for making no sense.
Being president looks like the worst job in the world. -John Mulaney

by Kenzo-Cyprii » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:41 am
Silvedania wrote:Did the Oprah interview say that she was going to run for prez? Cuz if it didn't which source did? I'd like to find which of them is publishing fake news.

by Vassenor » Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:43 am
Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:Silvedania wrote:Did the Oprah interview say that she was going to run for prez? Cuz if it didn't which source did? I'd like to find which of them is publishing fake news.
I googled “meghan markle president” and here are some of what I got;
•Page Six
•Republic World
•Mirror
•Nine
Well, these are a few of the ones that have it openly suggested in their articles titles.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Bombadil, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Philjia, Point Blob, Port Caverton, Squidward Town, Tarsonis, The Grand Fifth Imperium, Valles Marineris Mining co, Vistulange, Vivida Vis Animi
Advertisement