NATION

PASSWORD

Bethany Christian Services Extends LGBT Policy Nationwide

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Daves Computer
Envoy
 
Posts: 323
Founded: May 06, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Daves Computer » Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:27 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Suriyanakhon wrote:
It's pretty hard to improve something that is nonviable for the future and is resulting in massive income gaps and natural destruction.

Well, the core of what I am saying is that every single person should own private property. That my property starts where your ends.

Communism bad. The term is seen as taboo. But I agree that completely stripping private property rights is problematic to a prosperous and growing society. However, let's not let our criticisms or dare I say fears of communism poison our thoughts on welfare and similarly socialist policies. To some degree, we need our government to foster the development of our people and the agencies which do just that. An ideal society values private property rights, a capitalist market with prudent but not constricting oversight, and a government that uses its powers to supply aid to its people when needed.

Also, before I engage more in this discussion, how does this all relate to the OP?

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:33 pm

Daves Computer wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Well, the core of what I am saying is that every single person should own private property. That my property starts where your ends.

Communism bad. The term is seen as taboo. But I agree that completely stripping private property rights is problematic to a prosperous and growing society. However, let's not let our criticisms or dare I say fears of communism poison our thoughts on welfare and similarly socialist policies. To some degree, we need our government to foster the development of our people and the agencies which do just that. An ideal society values private property rights, a capitalist market with prudent but not constricting oversight, and a government that uses its powers to supply aid to its people when needed.

Also, before I engage more in this discussion, how does this all relate to the OP?

I think that it's possible for private efforts to support orphans as well as public efforts.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Daves Computer
Envoy
 
Posts: 323
Founded: May 06, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Daves Computer » Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:38 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Daves Computer wrote:Communism bad. The term is seen as taboo. But I agree that completely stripping private property rights is problematic to a prosperous and growing society. However, let's not let our criticisms or dare I say fears of communism poison our thoughts on welfare and similarly socialist policies. To some degree, we need our government to foster the development of our people and the agencies which do just that. An ideal society values private property rights, a capitalist market with prudent but not constricting oversight, and a government that uses its powers to supply aid to its people when needed.

Also, before I engage more in this discussion, how does this all relate to the OP?

I think that it's possible for private efforts to support orphans as well as public efforts.

That's fair. Though it should be noted that the private sector wouldn't participate in such work out of the goodness of their hearts normally. Often, it's to gain a profit. That might mean poorer conditions with regards to education, food quality, or living conditions. That's not to say the private sector is evil, but they need to make a profit somehow and unfortunately it will come at a cost. We've seen it with how archaic and problematic private prisons are.

User avatar
Thepeopl
Minister
 
Posts: 2646
Founded: Feb 24, 2019
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Thepeopl » Thu Mar 11, 2021 2:43 am

Cekovia wrote:i think that gay people should be able to adopt but not get married so i support this

Why?
By marriage, the children are better protected when calamities happen.
Say a child has an accident, they need life saving surgery.
Sadly, the partner who isn't married to the adoption parent because you don't support gay marriage, is the only one present at the hospital. So legally, they cannot agree to any surgery.
Or are you going to change adoption laws? Multiple people can adopt the same child?
So a child could have 5 legal parents?

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Camtropia, Dumb Ideologies, DutchFormosa, Duvniask, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], HISPIDA, Kainin, Nu Elysium, Nyoskova, Orcuo, Port Carverton, Russk, Rykil, Tarsonis, The Apollonian Systems, The Black Forrest, The Isstu Alliance, The Selkie, Tungstan, USHALLNOTPASS, Vassenor, Vestrata

Advertisement

Remove ads