by Infected Mushroom » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:42 am
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:43 am
by Greater Bahland » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:45 am
by A Salmon Named Harold » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:48 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:49 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Would this include spontaneous abortions? Better known as a miscarriage?
by Drongonia » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:51 am
The Republic of Drongonia
The MT powerhouse of Oceania. New Zealand but richer.
Overview | Political Parties | Our Leader | Defence Force Info | 9axes | Faces of Drongonia | Drongonia - The Man Behind the Spreadsheet
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:52 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:Would this include spontaneous abortions? Better known as a miscarriage?
I think (unless you can convince me otherwise and I'm open to Edits) that the scenario would work best (with the intended trade offs) if all miscarriages were eliminated by the magical rules.
It DOES make things more complicated (because now the magical rules could be saving lives too) but yeah...
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:53 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
I think (unless you can convince me otherwise and I'm open to Edits) that the scenario would work best (with the intended trade offs) if all miscarriages were eliminated by the magical rules.
It DOES make things more complicated (because now the magical rules could be saving lives too) but yeah...
Cool, I am making an army of unstoppable pregnant women. They can't die when the fetus is not capable of living outside the womb yet, since that also counts as a miscarriage.
by The Free Joy State » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:01 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:The most important factor here is that the ban on abortions wouldn't be permanent (it's only for 1,000 years)
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:25 am
by Kowani » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:25 am
by Glorious Hong Kong » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:28 am
by Comerciante » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:29 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:30 am
by Jedi Council » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:32 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.
by Picairn » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:33 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:33 am
by The Free Joy State » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:42 am
Picairn wrote:1,000 years?
One fucking thousand years???
Even 1 trillion dollars won't be able to rectify the damages from forbidding women to conduct abortions, plus it's a gross violation of human rights.
Never, ever, in a million years will I take the money.
by The Republic of Fore » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:50 am
by The Nihilistic view » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:52 am
by The Free Joy State » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:55 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Answered yes because whilst we would all like to think we would say no if you actually had that much money sat in front of you with no personal strings attached and nobody would know would you really actually say no? Most people's threshold for grabbing the money is significantly below one hundred million.
It's like all the people that would have done the Russian revolution without the death and how 100% of people would have resisted the Nazis or how everybody pretends they would be the three people that first campaigned against slavery. No you wouldn't be, you would fall foul of all the same pitfalls the people back then did and you would be at a very minimum complicit in the oppression by inactivity.
You are taking the money if it was real.
by Comerciante » Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:58 am
by The Republic of Fore » Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:00 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Answered yes because whilst we would all like to think we would say no if you actually had that much money sat in front of you with no personal strings attached and nobody would know would you really actually say no? Most people's threshold for grabbing the money is significantly below one hundred million.
It's like all the people that would have done the Russian revolution without the death and how 100% of people would have resisted the Nazis or how everybody pretends they would be the three people that first campaigned against slavery. No you wouldn't be, you would fall foul of all the same pitfalls the people back then did and you would be at a very minimum complicit in the oppression by inactivity.
You are taking the money if it was real.
by Great Pacific Switzerland » Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:01 am
by Comerciante » Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:03 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Andoros, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Herador, La Xinga, Vassenor
Advertisement