[NOT MINE] [WITHDRAWN] Condemn Frenchy

[Greater Cesnica]

NOTE: This proposal is NOT MINE. I am posting it here since it looks likely to reach quorum, and has no drafting or discussion thread.

UPDATE: This abomination was withdrawn thank god

---

Condemn Frenchy
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Frenchy
Proposed by: Odysseus

---

The Security Council,

Noting that Frenchy does a whole bunch of evil in its free time including raiding,

Hereby CONDEMNS Frenchy.

[Greater Cesnica]

Opportunistic, non-substantive proposal that wasn't drafted. The campaign telegram is literally better than the proposal itself. Opposed.

[Baedan]

This proposal seems entirely accurate, I'm not sure why anyone would oppose it.

[Greater Cesnica]

This proposal seems entirely accurate, I'm not sure why anyone would oppose it.

lol

[Gibraltarica]

Full support.

[Tinhampton]

Full support.

So when do I get to voice my support for Condemn Northern Borland?

(agreed)

[Wallenburg]

You'd think that the nominee would at least like to cloak their unearned condemnation in something resembling a meritorious argument.

[The Chariot]

Alliterative, acute, quaint - you will find the council to be convinced by this accurate condemnation. Full support.

[Baedan]

You'd think that the nominee would at least like to cloak their unearned condemnation in something resembling a meritorious argument.

Why would the nominee make an argument for their own condemnation? That would certainly be gauche

[Gibraltarica]

You'd think that the nominee would at least like to cloak their unearned condemnation in something resembling a meritorious argument.

The nominee needs no introduction. She is frenchy. she raids in her free time. She does evil.

[Wallenburg]

You'd think that the nominee would at least like to cloak their unearned condemnation in something resembling a meritorious argument.

Why would the nominee make an argument for their own condemnation? That would certainly be gauche

In the Security Council, both commendations and condemnations are for players that the community believes merit the award the resolution confers. Condemnations are for "evil" players only in an IC sense, not an OOC one.

[Gibraltarica]

Why would the nominee make an argument for their own condemnation? That would certainly be gauche

In the Security Council, both commendations and condemnations are for players that the community believes merit the award the resolution confers. Condemnations are for "evil" players only in an IC sense, not an OOC one.

She is quite evil in both senses *nods*

[Baedan]

Why would the nominee make an argument for their own condemnation? That would certainly be gauche

In the Security Council, both commendations and condemnations are for players that the community believes merit the award the resolution confers. Condemnations are for "evil" players only in an IC sense, not an OOC one.

Thank you Wallenburg, I am in fact familiar with the purpose of a condemnation. I'll ask again, why would the subject of the proposal be expected to argue for their own condemnation?

Also, Jinkies is as always correct that Frenchy is evil on all levels at all times

[Chingis]

Finally a good condemnation.
The quality of the SC has been dipping lately so I'm very happy to see a well-researched proposal such as this.

Full support.

[Wallenburg]

In the Security Council, both commendations and condemnations are for players that the community believes merit the award the resolution confers. Condemnations are for "evil" players only in an IC sense, not an OOC one.

Thank you Wallenburg, I am in fact familiar with the purpose of a condemnation. I'll ask again, why would the subject of the proposal be expected to argue for their own condemnation?

Also, Jinkies is as always correct that Frenchy is evil on all levels at all times

They wouldn't argue for their condemnation. They would, presumably want a condemnation that is...well...at least mediocre. Good would be preferable, but mediocre seems the best most writers around here can manage.

[Gibraltarica]

Thank you Wallenburg, I am in fact familiar with the purpose of a condemnation. I'll ask again, why would the subject of the proposal be expected to argue for their own condemnation?

Also, Jinkies is as always correct that Frenchy is evil on all levels at all times

They wouldn't argue for their condemnation. They would, presumably want a condemnation that is...well...at least mediocre. Good would be preferable, but mediocre seems the best most writers around here can manage.

Frenchy supports my condemnation effort, tyvm. I agree she deserves the best, and I think this proposal is well-polished, succinct, and doesn’t get too much into the nitty gritty no one cares about, unlike so many SC proposals these days. Frenchy does terrible terrible work and she deserves the best condemn for it.

[Baedan]

Thank you Wallenburg, I am in fact familiar with the purpose of a condemnation. I'll ask again, why would the subject of the proposal be expected to argue for their own condemnation?

Also, Jinkies is as always correct that Frenchy is evil on all levels at all times

They wouldn't argue for their condemnation. They would, presumably want a condemnation that is...well...at least mediocre. Good would be preferable, but mediocre seems the best most writers around here can manage.

I'm not sure a better proposal would be possible. I certainly can't imagine what one could look like.

[Comfed]

No.

[Owlograd]

This is beautiful...

[Outer Sparta]

Definitely one of those funny, joke-type proposals. It doesn't meet SC standards, but did make me laugh

[Gibraltarica]

Definitely one of those funny, joke-type proposals. It doesn't meet SC standards, but did make me laugh

It meets the rules for the SC perfectly. It is a diamond in the rough of frivolousness.

[Aredita]

I didn't approve this just because of it's lack of detail. I do support Condemning Frenchy, however, not like this.

This would be a great proposal, just needs TONS of work. Right idea, though.

[Honeydewistania]

Opposed.

Because I'm petty and spiteful, full support.

[Baedan]

I didn't approve this just because of it's lack of detail. I do support Condemning Frenchy, however, not like this.

This would be a great proposal, just needs TONS of work. Right idea, though.

What work do you think is necessary? This seems to cover the nominee's condemnable offenses

[Gibraltarica]

I didn't approve this just because of it's lack of detail. I do support Condemning Frenchy, however, not like this.

This would be a great proposal, just needs TONS of work. Right idea, though.

I would be willing to propose additional resolutions to expound on Frenchy’s utter wickedness once this one passes.