[Passed] Repeal "International Criminal Protocol"

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 3:40 pm

Replacement Draft for protecting Prison Conditions: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=496123

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Protocol" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses,

Reassuring member states that a replacement resolution has been drafted to carry on the vital protections GA #500 offered concerning prison conditions,

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties,

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners,

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”),

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination,
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - which cannot occur in the presence of the target resolution,

Appalled that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit, an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force,

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties, a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it,

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 3:40 pm

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Accord" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly;

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Accord" for its goal, which was to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses;

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties;

In particular, it must be noted that:

The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination;
Appalled by the resolution's acceptance of a mother being separated from her child upon birth to be executed, as permitted by the following clause: "That, in the case of a pregnant individual being sentenced to capital punishment, that execution be stayed until such time as the prisoner is no longer pregnant,";

Observing that the resolution poses a barrier to the potential abolition of capital punishment by a future resolution;

Horrified that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force;

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it;

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Accord".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Accord" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly;

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Accord" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses;

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties;

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners;

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 “Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”);

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination;
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - a ban which cannot be imposed in the presence of the target resolution;

Observing that the resolution poses a barrier to the potential abolition of capital punishment by a future resolution;

Appalled by the resolution's acceptance of a mother being separated from her child upon birth to be executed, as permitted by the following clause: "That, in the case of a pregnant individual being sentenced to capital punishment, that execution be stayed until such time as the prisoner is no longer pregnant,";

Horrified that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force;

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it;

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Accord".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Accord" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly;

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Accord" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses;

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties;

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners;

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 “Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”);

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination;
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - a ban which cannot be imposed in the presence of the target resolution;

Appalled by the resolution's acceptance of a mother being separated from her child upon birth to be executed, as permitted by the following clause: "That, in the case of a pregnant individual being sentenced to capital punishment, that execution be stayed until such time as the prisoner is no longer pregnant,";

Horrified that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force;

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it;

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Accord".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Protocol" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses,

Believing, however, that the well-meaning provisions of this resolution are unnecessary due to the existence of GA #9 "Prevention of Torture"; which prohibits the holding of a prisoner under inhumane conditions, the holding of a prisoner under punitive confinement, the denial of sustenance and/or medical care, and the holding of a prisoner in severely confined positions,

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties,

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners,

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 “Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”),

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination,
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - which cannot occur in the presence of the target resolution,

Appalled by the resolution's acceptance of a mother being separated from her child upon birth to be executed, as permitted by the following clause: "That, in the case of a pregnant individual being sentenced to capital punishment, that execution be stayed until such time as the prisoner is no longer pregnant,",

Horrified that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force,

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it,

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Accord".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Protocol" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses,

Dismayed that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties,

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners,

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”),

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination,
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - which cannot occur in the presence of the target resolution,

Appalled that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force,

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it,

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Protocol" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses,

Reassuring member states that a replacement resolution has been drafted; and is intended to carry on the vital protections offered by GA #500,

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties,

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners,

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”),

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination,
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - which cannot occur in the presence of the target resolution,

Appalled that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit; an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force,

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties; a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it,

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

General Assembly Resolution #500 "International Criminal Protocol" (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Applauding GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol" for its intended goal, which was ostensibly to preserve the civil liberties of those imprisoned from the horrors of state-sanctioned legal abuses,

Reassuring member states that a replacement resolution has been drafted to carry on the vital protections GA #500 offered concerning prison conditions,

Dismayed, however, that the resolution permits member states to decide the legality of capital punishment; a state-sanctioned penalty that this Assembly regards as inherently abhorrent and as posing a devastating detriment to civil liberties,

Cognizant that many ambassadors were unaware of the resolution’s toleration of the death penalty at the time of its passage, perhaps because of its focus on the rights of prisoners,

Referring to the fact that this body has previously repealed otherwise well-meaning resolutions on such grounds (see also GA#438 Repeal: “Crime And Punishment”),

In particular, it must be noted that:
The death penalty is always inconsistent with the inherent dignity of the person,
The costs of the administrative effort necessary to fully prove the guilt of the convicted almost always outweighs any of its possible financial benefits,
The presumption that the death penalty lowers violent crime rates is based on the empirically false assumption that the circumstances of violent crime can be considered in a vacuum where criminals act rationally,
The death penalty rarely aids the family of homicide victims, as it merely adds the emotional baggage of yet another life lost, and
The use of such a severe, irreversible penalty can further exacerbate disparities in justice systems, especially those with existing widespread discrimination,
Further noting that since the justifications presented for the use of the death penalty are insufficient to allow member states to legalize it, this esteemed Assembly ought to prohibit it - which cannot occur in the presence of the target resolution,

Appalled that this resolution stands in the way of preventing the execution of innocent persons for crimes they did not commit, an atrocity that will continue to occur so as long as this resolution remains in force,

Resolved that the numerous benefits and protections this resolution brings forth does not outweigh the crippling blow it inflicts upon civil liberties, a disservice to the good intentions that fostered it,

Hereby repeals GA #500 "International Criminal Protocol".

Co-authored by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle and Tinhampton.

by **Pope Saint Peter the Apostle** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 3:48 pm

OOC: I support in principle although Tinhampton, with whom I was working on a new version of the draft, and perhaps someone else too I think also already have drafts for such a repeal. But multiple drafts is fine.

by **Pope Saint Peter the Apostle** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 4:22 pm

Pope Saint Peter the Apostle wrote:OOC: I support in principle although Tinhampton, with whom I was working on a new version of the draft, and perhaps someone else too I think also already have drafts for such a repeal. But multiple drafts is fine.

...and resolved.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 4:24 pm

Pope Saint Peter the Apostle wrote:
Pope Saint Peter the Apostle wrote:OOC: I support in principle although Tinhampton, with whom I was working on a new version of the draft, and perhaps someone else too I think also already have drafts for such a repeal. But multiple drafts is fine.

...and resolved.

Indeed.

by **Honeydewistania** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 5:42 pm

I also do not support this repeal.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 5:53 pm

Honeydewistania wrote:I also do not support this repeal.

Are there any particular reasons why not?

by **Honeydewistania** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:00 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:
Honeydewistania wrote:I also do not support this repeal.

Are there any particular reasons why not?

1. Preventing the Execution of Innocents already enforces strong regulations on capital punishment, so basically only the genocidal dictators and the other worst of the worst get executed. I would like it to remain this way.

2. I don't get the 'appalled' clause. Are you saying it would be better for the mother to be separated from the child behind bars, in solitary confinement or something?

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:08 pm

Honeydewistania wrote:
Greater Cesnica wrote:Are there any particular reasons why not?

1. Preventing the Execution of Innocents already enforces strong regulations on capital punishment, so basically only the genocidal dictators and the other worst of the worst get executed. I would like it to remain this way.

2. I don't get the 'appalled' clause. Are you saying it would be better for the mother to be separated from the child behind bars, in solitary confinement or something?

Regarding the 'appalled' clause: I believe that it is indeed depraved that a mother should carry her baby to term only to be executed once the baby has been born. I do believe that it would be better for the mother to live, as this negates the potential of an innocent's execution, no matter how minute the odds may be. It is for this reason, and those that have been listed in the repeal itself that I believe capital punishment as a practice to be inherently cruel and unjust.

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:36 pm

I think the target ought to be repealed.

by **Desmosthenes and Burke** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:25 pm

The reasons given in this repeal are a hard pass, though I would like to see the target repealed.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:44 am

Anyone have any additional feedback?

by **Greater Cesnica** » Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:15 am

Draft updated.

by **Maowi** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:41 am

OOC: The target resolution is called "International Criminal Protocol" (not "Accord").

Edit: will there be a replacement resolution prepared with some of the non-death-penalty-related provisions of the target in place (e.g. the portions addressing solitary confinement)?

by **Greater Cesnica** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:47 am

Maowi wrote:OOC: The target resolution is called "International Criminal Protocol" (not "Accord").

Edit: will there be a replacement resolution prepared with some of the non-death-penalty-related provisions of the target in place (e.g. the portions addressing solitary confinement)?

That is my intent, to get a replacement draft lined up. Also, good catch

EDIT: I'm actually writing a replacement draft right now.

EDIT 2: I've decided to renege on the replacement, as per the new 'Believing' clause.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:36 pm

Added the following clause:

Believing, however, that the well-meaning provisions of this resolution are unnecessary due to the existence of GA #9 "Prevention of Torture"; which prohibits the holding of a prisoner under inhumane conditions, the holding of a prisoner under punitive confinement, the denial of sustenance and/or medical care, and the holding of a prisoner in severely confined positions,

This essentially adds juicy substance to the repeal besides the opposition to capital punishment.

by **WayNeacTia** » Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:22 am

Greater Cesnica wrote:Added the following clause:
Believing, however, that the well-meaning provisions of this resolution are unnecessary due to the existence of GA #9 "Prevention of Torture"; which prohibits the holding of a prisoner under inhumane conditions, the holding of a prisoner under punitive confinement, the denial of sustenance and/or medical care, and the holding of a prisoner in severely confined positions,

This essentially adds juicy substance to the repeal besides the opposition to capital punishment.

"Most of this repeal pertains solely to capital punishment, which has been defacto banned by the WA anyway. I see no reason to repeal this."

Wayne

by **Honeydewistania** » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:30 am

Believing, however, that the well-meaning provisions of this resolution are unnecessary due to the existence of GA #9 "Prevention of Torture"; which prohibits the holding of a prisoner under inhumane conditions, the holding of a prisoner under punitive confinement, the denial of sustenance and/or medical care, and the holding of a prisoner in severely confined positions,

Are they though? If there was nothing new being added to international law GA#500 would had been ruled illegal for duplication.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Thu Dec 24, 2020 6:20 am

Honeydewistania wrote:
Believing, however, that the well-meaning provisions of this resolution are unnecessary due to the existence of GA #9 "Prevention of Torture"; which prohibits the holding of a prisoner under inhumane conditions, the holding of a prisoner under punitive confinement, the denial of sustenance and/or medical care, and the holding of a prisoner in severely confined positions,

Are they though? If there was nothing new being added to international law GA#500 would had been ruled illegal for duplication.

This is what Sep said in regards to my replacement attempt: viewtopic.php?p=38122277#p38122277

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:32 pm

Removed secondary rider material. I'm gonna move this to Last Call.

by **Tinfect** » Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:54 pm

OOC:
Like certain prior repeal attempts, literally all this does, is construct a strawman unrelated to the target, (combined with some utterly unfounded claims, otherwise) and proceed to knock it down. It's an unimpressive effort to repeal critical civil rights legislation so as to try and shove through deeply unpopular policy.

Certain you'll get no support from me.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sat Dec 26, 2020 5:15 pm

Tinfect wrote:It's an unimpressive effort to repeal critical civil rights legislation so as to try and shove through deeply unpopular policy.

OOC: I encourage you to read my replacement draft attempt in regards to the civil rights protections that ICP offers. As for the death penalty: I believe that banning it directly is a matter of critical importance; considering that PEoI is also having a repeal drafted for it.

EDIT: So I've moved that above draft back to draftspace. So now a replacement is lined up to preserve the civil rights that ICP sought to protect.

by **Honeydewistania** » Sat Dec 26, 2020 5:32 pm

No replacement, no support.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sat Dec 26, 2020 5:38 pm

Honeydewistania wrote:No replacement, no support.

I've moved the replacement back to draftspace.

by **Potted Plants United** » Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:23 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:As for the death penalty: I believe that banning it directly is a matter of critical importance;

"As long as killing sapients in a war is entirely legal, given how many die in wars compared to how many are executed, anyone not also suggesting banning all killing of sapients for militaristic reasons, is a hypocrite who doesn't believe their own words."

[Passed] Repeal "International Criminal Protocol"

[Passed] Repeal "International Criminal Protocol"

Who is online