NATION

PASSWORD

Mutatio Constantism The ideal form of government

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Mutatio Constantism The ideal form of government

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 7:32 am

When was the last time a government lasted forever? Never... every government usually ends (although sometimes not I'll say why later) in violence, blood, and gory revolutions. Why though? Well if one looks carefully at all of history, the most violent revolutions happened in governments that refused to one appeal to the needs of the people which leads to two substantially change how they run things. Therefore the only way to advance and move on was to kill murder and destroy. However imagine how much better it would be if the Tsar appealed to the demands of his people, or if King George III did not tax the colonies? I believe then as Thomas Jefferson put it "“God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion." How about this let me put in in these terms. Have you ever gone to school and right when you entered the classroom realized you forgot top study for the test today? How good did you do? Most likely terrible. In the same way many ideologies (actually all that i know of) say that changing to something else is bad. See ideologies are too strict and that's why they fail so badly. A successful government is one that changes physically politically and economically. However while there should be basic values such as human rights, the government must still change according to the times and needs of people. You cannot be surprised by a revolution if you the government started it...

So here is the creation (or revival if it already existed) of would I assume to be a new formal ideology that combines all the ideologies. I plan to formulate my ideas in a book, so I can spread my ideas. What do you think about Mutatio Constantism?
Last edited by Witiland on Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14115
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Fri Nov 20, 2020 7:42 am

Probably because I'm an Aussie, but "Changi" seems like a bad word. So "Changism" isn't good either.

Not sure from the OP what "Changism" is. Are you looking for a system that allows parties maximum flexibility from one election to the next? Or perhaps some kind of term limit for parties?
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34530
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Cannot think of a name » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:22 am

Okay, I think I have this figured out.

We'll hold a convention where we'll forge a document that sets this up. Maybe a framework of broad principles and a system set up so that there are elected officials at various levels of government. We could even stagger it around so that the government is in a constant state of change without disrupting the performance of government.

Maybe we could even divide the powers among branches of this government so that power is shared and can ideally serve as a check on each other.

Oooo, then we have a list of established rights. And if we want to add something, we can establish a method to...I don't know, I guess amend our document. But we should make it difficult, you don't want just some group of uptight people to use it to ban alcohol or something crazy like that. Or at least cut down on that kind of thing.

As long as you don't do something ridiculous like try and form a society like that with half of them being slavers it might hold for a bit. Otherwise they'd probably be at each other's throats within 100 years.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:27 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:Okay, I think I have this figured out.

We'll hold a convention where we'll forge a document that sets this up. Maybe a framework of broad principles and a system set up so that there are elected officials at various levels of government. We could even stagger it around so that the government is in a constant state of change without disrupting the performance of government.

Maybe we could even divide the powers among branches of this government so that power is shared and can ideally serve as a check on each other.

Oooo, then we have a list of established rights. And if we want to add something, we can establish a method to...I don't know, I guess amend our document. But we should make it difficult, you don't want just some group of uptight people to use it to ban alcohol or something crazy like that. Or at least cut down on that kind of thing.

As long as you don't do something ridiculous like try and form a society like that with half of them being slavers it might hold for a bit. Otherwise they'd probably be at each other's throats within 100 years.


Your giving me Deja vu lol...
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:39 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Probably because I'm an Aussie, but "Changi" seems like a bad word. So "Changism" isn't good either.

Not sure from the OP what "Changism" is. Are you looking for a system that allows parties maximum flexibility from one election to the next? Or perhaps some kind of term limit for parties?


I was thinking that there would be roles in government that analyze the news and finds going on. They also use a document that says what government is best for what and at what time and the government willfully changes to whatever necessary. For example maybe for a short period of time they allow democracy, and in other times when lots need to get done dictorship (with basic human rights) its the constant change from communism to capitalism (although when it changes all depends) and democracy to autocracy. For the name I might have to change it to(no pun intended) maybe Mutatiosim (Mutatio means change in Latin) or something like that. or maybe Mutatio Constantism
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:59 am

I know how radical Mutatio Constantism may look, but in actually its what's been going on for centuries. But instead of revolutions randomly happening, the government changes willfully. Also our foundation is that no government is perfect only ideal or the best...
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6856
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
New York Times Democracy

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:07 am

Sounds like pragmatism.
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:14 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Sounds like pragmatism.



It does right? I think that's a good thing.
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Resilient Acceleration
Diplomat
 
Posts: 661
Founded: Sep 23, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Resilient Acceleration » Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:45 am

The best government form is the one that actually works. My country's constitution for example was a Frankenstein of compromises between various ideological groups, with the goal of preventing infighting. I'd say it was pretty successful in keeping together the country just long enough to survive, gain independence, and forge a stable bureaucratic structure and national identity, which then allowed for the communists and Islamists to be brutally murdered without falling into a failed state, after which the original compromise is discarded.
Last edited by Resilient Acceleration on Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

2033.12.21
 Koran Tempo | Starlink opens service in Myanmar and Laos, introduces anonymous blockchain subscription "free of taxes and government control" // Tatmadaw criminalizes "accessing unlicensed internet" as cheap, satellite-based foreign ISPs rendered blackouts and censorship impossible // Fears of retaliatory cyberattacks as Starlink eyes 'breaching' the 'Great Firewall' and open service to the Chinese market

A near-future scenario where transhumanist tech barons and their ruthless capitalism are trying to save the planet, emphasis on "try" | Resilient Accelerationism in a nutshell | OOC

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 26354
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:19 am

Witiland wrote:However imagine how much better it would be if the Tsar appealed to the demands of his people, or if King George III did not tax the colonies?


George III didn't tax the colonies. The parliament of the Kingdom of Great Britain taxed the colonies.

Jefferson's decision to personalise the disagreement as one between the colonies and the monarch in the Declaration of Independence was a quite deliberate misrepresentation of how the British constitution operated in the late 18th century, albeit one that cleverly focused on the theoretical status of the Crown over the operational status of Parliament.

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:27 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Witiland wrote:However imagine how much better it would be if the Tsar appealed to the demands of his people, or if King George III did not tax the colonies?


George III didn't tax the colonies. The parliament of the Kingdom of Great Britain taxed the colonies.

Jefferson's decision to personalise the disagreement as one between the colonies and the monarch in the Declaration of Independence was a quite deliberate misrepresentation of how the British constitution operated in the late 18th century, albeit one that cleverly focused on the theoretical status of the Crown over the operational status of Parliament.



However do you still understand and grasp the point I'm trying to make? We need constant change according to what's best and what's wanted. I will keep that in mind when I write my book
Last edited by Witiland on Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Phoenicaea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1968
Founded: May 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Phoenicaea » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:43 am

^a constitution whose innate tendencies contrast with vicious tendencies of that nation, perhaps

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20807
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Senkaku » Sat Nov 21, 2020 11:57 am

Thank you for the blinding insight that governments need to change sometimes
haters will see you growing on a finite planet and say you can't grow infinitely

User avatar
Czechostan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1163
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Czechostan » Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:34 pm

Different factions could rule the country based on the day of the week. Marxist Monday, Fascist Friday, Stirnerite Saturday.
"The oldest, shortest words—"yes" and "no"—are those which require the most thought." ~Pythagoras

I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:11 pm

Czechostan wrote:Different factions could rule the country based on the day of the week. Marxist Monday, Fascist Friday, Stirnerite Saturday.



Hmm lol kind of see what your saying but it would be over years not days....
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:13 pm

Senkaku wrote:Thank you for the blinding insight that governments need to change sometimes



No problem. That's what I don't like about most ideologies, they believe that the are the best and that government is the best when it stays the same. But Mutatio Constantism says that every ideology is equal in strength and weakness and we must use very one all the right time.
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:36 pm

Of course there are certain certain restriction on Mutataion Constantism one in rejecting Nazism but not rejecting fascism as some forms of Fascism is not racist as Nazism is usually is....
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32633
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:55 pm

Witiland wrote:Of course there are certain certain restriction on Mutataion Constantism one in rejecting Nazism but not rejecting fascism as some forms of Fascism is not racist as Nazism is usually is....

lolwut.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:46 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Witiland wrote:Of course there are certain certain restriction on Mutataion Constantism one in rejecting Nazism but not rejecting fascism as some forms of Fascism is not racist as Nazism is usually is....

lolwut.



What I'm saying is that even Mutatio Constanism has its limits and there should not be discrimination/injustice. However this can be blurry on what's infringing on human rights and what's acceptable.
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Anatoliyanskiy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 473
Founded: Jan 19, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Anatoliyanskiy » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:52 pm

This, is pragmatism. It sounds nearly exactly like what pragmatic ideals are, but changed slightly and more specific. So maybe call it "Constantist Pragmatism"? That actually sounds kinda cool.
Pro: Environmentalism, Eco-Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy,Progressivism, Pro-choice, Pro-LGTBQ+ rights, Immigration, Bernie Sanders,Secularism, Palestine And Israel, Internationalism, Alter-Globalization.
Anti: Conservatism, Traditionalism, Bigotry, TERF movement, Fascism, Stalinism, Totalitarianism, Laissez-faire capitalism, Libertarianism, Bolsonaro, Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism
We mostly use NS stats. No I don't accept Telegrams.
I'm a Eco-Libertarian Democratic Socialist, or ELDS for short.
Forums that I've posted: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=487988 (dead but useful for info)
Ive been on this site for 1 year. I don't know if this is an accomplishment or just sad.

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:54 pm

Anatoliyanskiy wrote:This, is pragmatism. It sounds nearly exactly like what pragmatic ideals are, but changed slightly and more specific. So maybe call it "Constantist Pragmatism"? That actually sounds kinda cool.



Hmm it does actually, i might do that then. Now I have heard about Pragmatism however I do not have a deep understanding of it. Could you explain in detail please?
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Diarcesia
Minister
 
Posts: 3356
Founded: Aug 21, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Diarcesia » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:56 pm

Witiland wrote:When was the last time a government lasted forever? Never... every government usually ends (although sometimes not I'll say why later) in violence, blood, and gory revolutions. Why though? Well if one looks carefully at all of history, the most violent revolutions happened in governments that refused to one appeal to the needs of the people which leads to two substantially change how they run things. Therefore the only way to advance and move on was to kill murder and destroy. However imagine how much better it would be if the Tsar appealed to the demands of his people, or if King George III did not tax the colonies? I believe then as Thomas Jefferson put it "“God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion." How about this let me put in in these terms. Have you ever gone to school and right when you entered the classroom realized you forgot top study for the test today? How good did you do? Most likely terrible. In the same way many ideologies (actually all that i know of) say that changing to something else is bad. See ideologies are too strict and that's why they fail so badly. A successful government is one that changes physically politically and economically. However while there should be basic values such as human rights, the government must still change according to the times and needs of people. You cannot be surprised by a revolution if you the government started it...

So here is the creation (or revival if it already existed) of would I assume to be a new formal ideology that combines all the ideologies. I plan to formulate my ideas in a book, so I can spread my ideas. What do you think about Mutatio Constantism?

tl;dr: The best ideology is no ideology.
Factbooks | Economic Liaison | Maintenance
Role Player and Lore Player
- = A I L U R O C R A C Y = -

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32633
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:56 pm

Anatoliyanskiy wrote:This, is pragmatism. It sounds nearly exactly like what pragmatic ideals are, but changed slightly and more specific. So maybe call it "Constantist Pragmatism"? That actually sounds kinda cool.

Let's stop beating around the bush: it's just pragmatism. There is no real substance here to make it a different ideology.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Witiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Nov 13, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:59 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Anatoliyanskiy wrote:This, is pragmatism. It sounds nearly exactly like what pragmatic ideals are, but changed slightly and more specific. So maybe call it "Constantist Pragmatism"? That actually sounds kinda cool.

Let's stop beating around the bush: it's just pragmatism. There is no real substance here to make it a different ideology.




Yes but if pragmatism was a government, now what exactly does pragmatism believe?
Our leader is a WEREWOLF deal with it
AMERICAN!!!
Politics is fun BLM
BIDEN2020

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7123
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:00 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Anatoliyanskiy wrote:This, is pragmatism. It sounds nearly exactly like what pragmatic ideals are, but changed slightly and more specific. So maybe call it "Constantist Pragmatism"? That actually sounds kinda cool.

Let's stop beating around the bush: it's just pragmatism. There is no real substance here to make it a different ideology.

Just be glad it's not pragmatarianism.
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Byumba, Celritannia, Conklandi, Dresderstan, Fartsniffage, Google Adsense [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Kilobugya, Kowani, Loeje, My Political Fantasy, Nakena, Nantoraka, Omniabstracta, Sundiata, The Black Forrest, The New California Republic, The Palmetto, The Yeetusa, Theberstan, Torisakia, Washington Resistance Army, Xiashu, Yuzu China

Advertisement

Remove ads