by Wille-Harlia » Wed Nov 11, 2020 5:52 pm
by Honeydewistania » Wed Nov 11, 2020 5:56 pm
Ambassador to the WA: Benji Schubert Hepperle
Assistant to the Ambassador: Rekeil Wrigglesworth II
Official Coffee-fetcher and Masseuse: Jonathan Santos de Oliveira
by Stentasia » Wed Nov 11, 2020 7:16 pm
by Wille-Harlia » Wed Nov 11, 2020 8:58 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:"What does this proposal aim to legislate that hasn’t been covered by GA#97, Quality in Health Services?"
OOC: Welcome to the General Assembly
Stentasia wrote:"a. Set aside a portion of their governments’ yearly budget towards research for mental illnesses;
b. Set aside a portion of their government’s yearly budget to further research into cures for mental illnesses;"
Do these not both achieve the same thing? What is the difference between research "for" mental illness and research "into cures"?
by Honeydewistania » Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:04 pm
Ambassador to the WA: Benji Schubert Hepperle
Assistant to the Ambassador: Rekeil Wrigglesworth II
Official Coffee-fetcher and Masseuse: Jonathan Santos de Oliveira
by Wille-Harlia » Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:12 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:"Ambassador Hill, there are differences between normal mental ailments and full intellectual disabilities. Which one are you trying to cover?"
by Kenmoria » Thu Nov 12, 2020 12:57 am
by Wille-Harlia » Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:30 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“Welcome to the festering snakepit, ambassador. This isn’t an immediately disagreeable concept, which is good, but there are of course improvements to be made. Firstly, how is the WAMIPCA to keep this private record? That seems like a very challenging task, given the enormity of the combined populations of member states. There is also no provision for those who are afflicted by mental illnesses yet to not want to have such a record kept of them. Likewise, how would clause 4 work? Is this is a WA committee that would physically go into member states’ territories? That could cause a few problems with some of more isolationist states here.
5a should have somewhere ‘unless such is already existent’ or similar wording. Kenmoria doesn’t have such an agency, but I am sure there are multiple states which do. Also, 5b is misworded, since it currently prevents non-disabled people from receiving any care from a licensed professional whatsoever. You should have ‘to receive care pertaining to a mental disability’ rather than just ‘to receive care’.”
by Wille-Harlia » Thu Nov 19, 2020 7:34 pm
by Wille-Harlia » Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:34 am
by Honeydewistania » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:00 am
Wille-Harlia wrote:So, here's the draft:
Access to Mental Healthcare
Category: Health | Strength: Significant
The World Assembly,
Noting that those with mental illnesses may have trouble going about their daily lives, especially when it comes to social interactions,
Concerned that some member-states of this esteemed Assembly do not have systems in place to care for the mentally disabled and that in some member-states, mentally disabled people are even discriminated against,
Committed to promoting the well-being of all our citizens by ensuring that their mental health is valued and guarded, hereby:
1. Entrusts the World Assembly Mentally Ill Persons Care Agency (WAMIPCA) to help achieve this goal;
1. Establishes the World Assembly Mentally Ill Persons Care Agency, and empowers it to do the following:
3. Mandates that:
a. If a member-state does not already have a government agency akin in purpose to the WAMIPCA, then the member-state shall create one that shall be in charge of assigning nurses and/or other qualified professionals to care for a mentally ill person, at the request of the family of the mentally ill person in question,
b. In order for a person to receive care pertaining to a mental disability from a qualified professional, that person must be certified and recorded in the WAMIPCA database as mentally disabled by a licensed medical expert.
i. Mentally ill citizens of a member-state reserve the right to not be included in the private WAMIPCA database if they so choose
5. Empowers the WAMIPCA to provide care directly to the mentally ill if a member-state is otherwise unable to provide care itself by:
a. Sending licensed medical experts to care for the mentally ill populace of a member-state;
b. Sending licensed medical experts to the member-state to educate its populace on how to care for the mentally ill;
c. Aiding the government of the member-state in establishing care facilities for the mentally ill.
Ambassador to the WA: Benji Schubert Hepperle
Assistant to the Ambassador: Rekeil Wrigglesworth II
Official Coffee-fetcher and Masseuse: Jonathan Santos de Oliveira
by Tinfect » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:13 am
Imperium Central News Network: Preliminary trials of Military Doctrinal Reform prototypes to begin; IRPC 5-115, 5-298, 5-076 public details, Project Lead interviews released | Aeravahn occupation expands to 17% of the Exterior Territories, Internal Security orders full-stop to Civilian expeditions to Exterior | TCO - Vigilant Star declared missing following exit of Iraet orbital region | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Ardiveds » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:06 am
by Araraukar » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:39 pm
Tinfect wrote:OOC:
I don't have the time to respond to this properly as-yet, but as a mentally ill person, I don't particularly like the idea of being automatically placed on some kind of international monitoring list, regardless of the option to opt-out.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Wille-Harlia » Mon Nov 23, 2020 8:18 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Great Algerstonia, Podria, Remraf Drac 3, Tinhampton, Wadelhelpia
Advertisement