NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Repeal "WA Trade Rights"

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

[PASSED] Repeal "WA Trade Rights"

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:57 pm

Image
Repeal "WA Trade Rights"



The World Assembly finds as follows:

  1. Extending trade preferences on a most-favoured nation basis to all member nations requires that any further preference to an allied member nation also be given to other unfriendly member nations. Governments have interests in stopping the transfer of technology or linking of their industry with such unfriendly nations, motives which are not accounted for in GA 209, which only permits exceptions for 'vital national security interests during serious international disputes or times of war'.

  2. Section 1(c) of the target resolution allows for existing trade zones to exist. But it is unclear how such existing trade zones can possibly 'ultimately lower trade barriers between their members' without inherently contradicting the most-favoured nation provision in section 1(a), as any members of a trade zone would by virtue of their membership be more favoured than non-trade zone member nations, putting such members in violation of section 1(a) unless their trade zone membership privileges were extended to all World Assembly member nations.

  3. Section 2 does not give member nations authority to institute retaliatory tariffs against dumping or other unfair trade practices, instead only giving member nations the ability to support domestic industry with subsidies. This has two impacts. First, subsidies cost member nations money, while tariffs (being taxes) are net positive on a nation's treasury. By only allowing subsidies, this penalises member nations with weaker financial situations. Second, the use of subsidies instead of tariffs causes a race towards higher subsidies, as subsidies increase production, further driving down commodity prices, necessitating even higher subsidies to ensure viability. This singular-minded view on subsidies therefore harms the poorest member nations and saddles the Assembly as a whole with chronic overproduction and government support of inefficient industries.

  4. GA 440 'Administrative Compliance Act' uses trade sanctions as a core means of enforcement of World Assembly legislation. It is unclear how strong such sanctions can be when section 1(a) requires equal treatment of nations regardless of their compliance with World Assembly resolutions. Basic fairness requires that member nations which are not compliant with Assembly legislation, a duty of membership in the Assembly, should not be given the benefits of membership. Repeal, therefore, repairs a sense of basic fairness necessary for the Assembly to operate justly and impartially.

  5. Further legislation should be passed, patching the flaws present in GA 209, to ensure sufficient incentives for membership in the World Assembly.

Now, therefore, the World Assembly repeals GA 209 'World Assembly Trade Rights'.
Last edited by Ransium on Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:45 am, edited 11 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:57 pm

Target resolution. viewtopic.php?p=10556924#p10556924
GA 440 (ACA). viewtopic.php?p=34697384#p34697384

Member states must enforce the strongest sanctions available against those member states that refuse to pay IAO fines, subject only to the limitations of extant law, until the fines are paid or the issue becomes moot.

Other remarks on how WA Trade Rights can also be loopholed by its poor treatment of origination rules. viewtopic.php?f=9&t=492140&p=37757644#p37757644.

Ejusdem generis.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Thu Oct 15, 2020 7:28 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15317
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:13 pm

IC: "Support. I don't even care what reasons you give for this repeal, it's still supported."

OOC: I still won't read your OOC lectures (that you linked to), but that resolution never really made sense in the multiversal context of WA.

EDIT: Though the argument #4 (about trade bans and compliance gnomes) seems to be covered by 2. a., c. and d. of the target.
Last edited by Araraukar on Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Bananaistan
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2718
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:16 pm

"This is a cromulent repeal in terms of the Socialism in All Countries policy of the Party. The People's Democracies should be free to pick and choose which other member nations they wish to trade with while the previously well known flaws, applicable to our misguided "liberal" friends, are well covered here and good spot on this additional issue regarding GAR#440."
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:31 pm

Araraukar wrote:EDIT: Though the argument #4 (about trade bans and compliance gnomes) seems to be covered by 2. a., c. and d. of the target.

It's not.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Tinfect
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5084
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Sat Oct 10, 2020 4:23 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
Araraukar wrote:EDIT: Though the argument #4 (about trade bans and compliance gnomes) seems to be covered by 2. a., c. and d. of the target.

It's not.


OOC
In the interests of the completeness of the record, it would be greatly appreciated if you could elaborate as to how, here, rather than dragging the explanation out for two pages between snipes.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: Military Oversight announces Doctrinal Reform Plan, upcoming military trials | Former Intelligence Director Taraen Vallir, additional operatives executed | 200 year old Varat destroyer found in Balder orbit at historic shipyard location, presumed malfunction of still-installed warp drive | Archive Systems, Hyperpulse Network briefly disabled following accidental release of experimental assistance program | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Oct 10, 2020 4:42 pm

Tinfect wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:It's not.

OOC. In the interests of the completeness of the record, it would be greatly appreciated if you could elaborate as to how, here, rather than dragging the explanation out for two pages between snipes.

Sure. In these clauses:

2. Clarifies that member nations may suspend their individual responsibilities under the above provision in the following cases:

    a. in the event of a significant disparity in labour, environmental or human rights standards, or to ensure reasonable quality control on goods and services, but only if such a suspension does not constitute discrimination between goods and services from different member nations with similar issues,

    b. to apply domestic subsidies, or to protect domestic industries against a discriminatory subsidy applied by another member nation, so long as any retaliation in the latter case is directly proportional to the original subsidy,

    c. to protect vital national security interests during serious international disputes or times of war, or

    d. to develop any other additional reasonable and appropriate trade regulations that are consistent with the goals of this resolution, as well as the interests of sustainable development and poverty reduction, either unilaterally through domestic legislation or collectively through World Assembly resolution.

Are all possible violations of WA legislation included as part of the exceptions? No. If, for example, one nation fails to enforce say, the provisions in International Transport Safety, having to do with commercial freedoms, in a way which is not significant, then this whole section does not provide an exception for the operation of the ACA. (This is especially the case when considering that ACA sanctions and fines are imposed on the basis of coercing compliance rather than being expensive licences for unlawful behaviour.) Nor would, say, sanctions in response to a member nation illegally seizing WA Choice Plus clinics. Sanctions also, on say, import of paper from some non-compliant nation, also would not be a 'vital national security interest[]' that would be immunised from GA 209. On top of that, subsection (d) fails to save the ACA sanctions' efficacy, because among the goals of GA 209, you will not find 'enforce compliance with ACA fines'.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15317
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:55 am

OOC: So you are saying the compliance gnome resolution was illegal for contradiction when it passed and you knew it?

Not really agreeing with your clause 5 here, but because Araraukar in IC doesn't WANT to be forced to do foreign trade with anyone, still support for IC reasons
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15588
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sun Oct 11, 2020 4:40 am

Araraukar wrote:OOC: So you are saying the compliance gnome resolution was illegal for contradiction when it passed and you knew it?

Not really agreeing with your clause 5 here, but because Araraukar in IC doesn't WANT to be forced to do foreign trade with anyone, still support for IC reasons

Ooc: it is quite possible to write something and figure out after that there is a conflict. Or at least a genuine question as to how two laws interact.

Full support.

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Honeydewistania » Sun Oct 11, 2020 5:23 am

Absolute full support
Honeydewistania (Nation mostly does not represent real life views.)

Retired Regional Military Director of Lazarus
Ambassador to the WA: Benji Schubert Hepperle
Assistant to the Ambassador: Rekeil Wrigglesworth II
Official Coffee-fetcher and Masseuse: Jonathan Santos de Oliveira

The MT Army Warrior
Need me? Click here!
Biggest acheivement: Spelling

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15317
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun Oct 11, 2020 5:30 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:Ooc: it is quite possible to write something and figure out after that there is a conflict. Or at least a genuine question as to how two laws interact.

OOC: Well aware of that, given the GenSec exists for that whole reason, pretty much. :p
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:56 am

Araraukar wrote:OOC: So you are saying the compliance gnome resolution was illegal for contradiction when it passed and you knew it?

Beyond Sep's well-taken point about how information from the future is sometimes not available: maybe instead of making strange allegations of illegality, you should read the ACA. Specifically, art 4 s 4. Oh, and, to the end of the clause as well, unlike how you read section 1(b) of GA 209. Then, you might be able to make arguments that respect the text and meaning of the resolution, instead of strangely unbalanced accusations.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Potted Plants United
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1017
Founded: Jan 14, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Potted Plants United » Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:00 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:maybe instead of making strange allegations of illegality

OOC: Quite sure I have never called your resolution illegal after it passed, since by virtue of passing it can't be illegal... :eyebrow:
This nation is a plant-based hivemind. It's current ambassador for interacting with humanoids is a bipedal plant creature standing at almost two metres tall. In IC in the WA.
My main nation is Araraukar.
Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
- Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:06 am

Potted Plants United wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:maybe instead of making strange allegations of illegality

OOC: Quite sure I have never called your resolution illegal after it passed, since by virtue of passing it can't be illegal... :eyebrow:

How do we evaluate the truth value of this statement? It must be some kind of mystery!

OOC: So you are saying the compliance gnome resolution was illegal for contradiction when it passed and you knew it? (at 4.55p EDT on 11 Oct 2020)

When was the proposal passed?

Implemented Tue Aug 28 2018

Was this claim made after the proposal passed? Yes. Is saying a resolution 'was illegal ... when it passed' still 'call[ing] [a] resolution illegal'? Yes. Did the president receive supplemental oxygen? 'The president is not receiving supplemental oxygen right now.' Is this an attempt to distract from the fact that the original claim of contradiction with GA 209 is still wrong? Possibly. Is the original claim of contradiction with GA 209 is still wrong? Yes. Is this entire argument about the ACA's illegality at any time, before or after passage, based on incorrect assumptions? Yes.

Is the specific provision of ACA which doesn't conflict with GA 209 quoted in this thread explicitly? Yes. When was it added? 10 Oct 2020 18:35 EDT. Was that before Ara's post alleging 'illegal[ity] for contradiction when it passed'? Yes.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:19 am, edited 2 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15317
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:03 am

OOC: Reading comprehension, dear, is your friend here. I asked if you were calling your resolution illegal. If you weren't, you could have just said no. Now it's looking like a case of "the lady doth protest too much".

Also, have you thought of talking to someone about this "Ara is always out to get me" paranoia of yours?

To everyone else, don't worry, I won't respond to more offtopicness from him on this thread, just things related to the proposal. :)
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:37 am

Araraukar wrote:*snip*

This is some extreme projection here. After misreading my proposal (above), GA 209, GA 440 (the ACA), GA 17, NEF, CoCR and my response, you want to pivot to reading comprehension. I laid out your claim bare, deconstructed its premises, and showed their objective falsity already. I'm sorry for not being the pushover you like to noob bash.



I intend to submit post-haste.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Tinhampton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7429
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Tue Oct 13, 2020 10:48 am

Submitted. Also opposed due to bullet point #4.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491
Other achievements: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; -45 Darkspawn Kill Points; current WA Delegate of Auctor; "Tinhampton? the man's literally god"
Who am I, really? 45yo Tory woman; Cambridge graduate; possibly very controversial; currently reading Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 713
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:34 pm

General support.

The North Pacific Minister of WA Affairs
Author: 8 GA + 3 SC resolutions, and a lot of drafts

WALL ambassador
Assume OOC

Killer of Stats
"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA #496
GA #503 (1st in category)
GA #504
GA #509 (1st in category)
GA #510
GA #512
GA #520
GA #523

SC #318
SC #331
SC #333

User avatar
Desmosthenes and Burke
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Oct 07, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Desmosthenes and Burke » Tue Oct 13, 2020 10:01 pm

We are opposed for the same reason as the...questionably honorable ambassador Smith. We view the neutering of the ACA as an absolute feature, and not a bug.
香港加油!林郑月娥一定要去!自由香港万岁!五毛回家!| Carrie Lam must go! Long Live Free Hong Kong | La France pour les Français et Ceux Qu'en Veut Devenir Un.

User avatar
Ouardeheya
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 13, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ouardeheya » Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:00 am

While I do understand the necessity to repeal a resolution that stifles the functioning of other resolutions and also contains some contradictions within itself, considering that §5 mentions further legislation, is such legislation being drafted right now, or are there some plans for the foreseeable future?

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:03 am

Ouardeheya wrote:While I do understand the necessity to repeal a resolution that stifles the functioning of other resolutions and also contains some contradictions within itself, considering that §5 mentions further legislation, is such legislation being drafted right now, or are there some plans for the foreseeable future?

I have a draft in the works. It's not ready for public comment yet, but should be shortly.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Goobergunchia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 1696
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Goobergunchia » Thu Oct 15, 2020 3:45 pm

For the information of all Members, Proposal 1602607325, "Repeal: 'World Assembly Trade Rights'", proposed by the United Commonwealths of Imperium Anglorum, has reached quorum and is now in the queue to be voted on. Question to be put in five hours fourteen minutes.

User avatar
United Republic Empire
Envoy
 
Posts: 314
Founded: Jul 27, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby United Republic Empire » Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:45 pm

Why do I feel like IA is just going to turn around and remake a proposal very similar to the one they are repealing in order to get another proposal high score count under their belt.

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Honeydewistania » Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:33 am

United Republic Empire wrote:Why do I feel like IA is just going to turn around and remake a proposal very similar to the one they are repealing in order to get another proposal high score count under their belt.

It’ll be years before anyone even gets close to IA’s current score, so your theory is likely false
Honeydewistania (Nation mostly does not represent real life views.)

Retired Regional Military Director of Lazarus
Ambassador to the WA: Benji Schubert Hepperle
Assistant to the Ambassador: Rekeil Wrigglesworth II
Official Coffee-fetcher and Masseuse: Jonathan Santos de Oliveira

The MT Army Warrior
Need me? Click here!
Biggest acheivement: Spelling

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9880
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:02 am

United Republic Empire wrote:Why do I feel like IA is just going to turn around and remake a proposal very similar to the one they are repealing in order to get another proposal high score count under their belt.

Maybe a bit late.

Image

Author: 1 SC and 38 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Honeydewistania, Nooooooooooooooo

Advertisement

Remove ads