NATION

PASSWORD

Anti-Socialism Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
-Ra-
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 405
Founded: Aug 09, 2020
Capitalizt

Anti-Socialism Thread

Postby -Ra- » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:53 pm

Welcome all!
Image


This thread is dedicated to advancing and providing a space for anti-socialist, anti-communist, and anti-Marxist discussion. Anti-socialism is opposition to socialism, but first it's important to understand what socialism is and isn't. In the broadest of terms, socialism (in theory) is an economic and social model that advocates for collective ownership of the "means of production" (basically things that make things). Most often, this "collective ownership" is really just state ownership with the veneer of popular ownership tacked on.

Socialism is opposed to capitalism, whose proponents believe that the means of production should be owned by individuals. Capitalists believe that, by voting with their money, individuals should decide what goods are produced in the free market. In this way firms that are the most efficient, cost-effective and practical for the consumer will rise to the top. Capitalism has coexisted with freedom and liberal democracy since its inception, and greater social/political freedom is exoribly tied to greater economic freedom. Socialists believe that production should be determined by the state, usually through economic planning. The core objective of socialism is the abolition of private property.

It's important to remember that socialism is not universal healthcare, public roads, free public education, taxes, unions, or "the government doing stuff." These are social policies, not socialist policies, and they are all perfectly compatible with capitalism.

Communism is the ultimate objective of socialism, which (again, in theory) is a movement whose ultimate objective is the creation of a classless, cashless worker-run society. It bears mentioning that, despite many regimes attempts to create such a society, a communist society has never truly existed and never will, as the ideas of communism are fundamentally impractical. Socialism is the vector through which communism is supposedly to be brought about.

There are different gradations of socialism. More standard fare revolutionary socialists believe that capitalism can only be overthrown by a popular revolution. Socialists of this stripe resort to authoritarian and illiberal actions to fulfill their goals. "Democratic" socialists believe that socialism may be brought about by democratic processes, particularly by electoral democracy. It's important to note that democratic socialists and revolutionary socialists do not differ in their ends. They both seek to establish a socialist society. They only differ in that they have different means to that end.

Of course, it's important to remember that there really is no such thing as "democratic" socialism, because the tenants of socialism are fundamentally anti-democratic. Democracy only exists as long as it respects individual liberty. You cannot strip people of their right to property and still call yourself a democracy. This is of course not to mention that all socialist regimes have been authoritarian hellholes whose economic plans have wreaked incalculable havoc upon the world and resulted in millions of people's needless deaths. Socialism is just an excuse for authoritarianism that has never nor will ever accomplish the goals it sets for itself.




So, anti-socialists of NationStates, here are a few questions:
  1. Does socialism still present a threat to the world? To your country?
  2. Should liberals and conservatives do more to square their differences and rally against socialist tides, wherever they may spring up?
  3. At what point is armed resistance against socialism called for?
Notes on the Left | Leftism ought not be understood as a concrete political ideology, but rather as a counterculture movement whose principal aim is the total overthrow of democratic society.

User avatar
Kowani
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26112
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:53 pm

Copium mine
Telconi wrote:Every once in a while Kowani does have a decent point.

Kowani wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Also, you could quit being a condescending dick.
I could. But am I going to? Nah.
ni dio, ni rey, ni patria, ni amo

Take nothing I say seriously, unless there is a link.
Currently Reading: The Rights of Man (T. Paine)

User avatar
Brettenwald
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 488
Founded: May 03, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Brettenwald » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:54 pm

[citation needed]
A Class 1.142 Civilization according to this index.| Brettenwave(プモ) |7/10 according to DGES| Proud signatory to the Amistad Declaration.
Kiu Ghesik wrote:szochiyalizm is whegh the gubamintt dowes stughph
andde whegbn it dus moar stughffpf
izz gobmbnunuismsm
Honeydewistania wrote:Eat the Rich
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. -Mark Twain
20M, bi, history major, former centrist fence-sitter now occupying the lonely nether space between the Warren/Biden and AOC/The Squad wings of the Democratic Party.
My Q&A thread!
PSA: Blue Lives Matter is an inherently false equivalency mocking a real issue in American society. Being a cop is a choice, being black isn't.

User avatar
Anatoliyanskiy
Envoy
 
Posts: 229
Founded: Jan 19, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Anatoliyanskiy » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:55 pm

-Ra- wrote:Welcome all!


This thread is dedicated to advancing and providing a space for anti-socialist, anti-communist, and anti-Marxist discussion. Anti-socialism is opposition to socialism, but first it's important to understand what socialism is and isn't. In the broadest of terms, socialism (in theory) is an economic and social model that advocates for collective ownership of the "means of production" (basically things that make things). Most often, this "collective ownership" is really just state ownership with the veneer of popular ownership tacked on.

Socialism is opposed to capitalism, whose proponents believe that the means of production should be owned by individuals. Capitalists believe that, by voting with their money, individuals should decide what goods are produced in the free market. In this way firms that are the most efficient, cost-effective and practical for the consumer will rise to the top. Capitalism has coexisted with freedom and liberal democracy since its inception, and greater social/political freedom is exoribly tied to greater economic freedom. Socialists believe that production should be determined by the state, usually through economic planning. The core objective of socialism is the abolition of private property.

It's important to remember that socialism is not universal healthcare, public roads, free public education, taxes, unions, or "the government doing stuff." These are social policies, not socialist policies, and they are all perfectly compatible with capitalism.

Communism is the ultimate objective of socialism, which (again, in theory) is a movement whose ultimate objective is the creation of a classless, cashless worker-run society. It bears mentioning that, despite many regimes attempts to create such a society, a communist society has never truly existed and never will, as the ideas of communism are fundamentally impractical. Socialism is the vector through which communism is supposedly to be brought about.

There are different gradations of socialism. More standard fare revolutionary socialists believe that capitalism can only be overthrown by a popular revolution. Socialists of this stripe resort to authoritarian and illiberal actions to fulfill their goals. "Democratic" socialists believe that socialism may be brought about by democratic processes, particularly by electoral democracy. It's important to note that democratic socialists and revolutionary socialists do not differ in their ends. They both seek to establish a socialist society. They only differ in that they have different means to that end.

Of course, it's important to remember that there really is no such thing as "democratic" socialism, because the tenants of socialism are fundamentally anti-democratic. Democracy only exists as long as it respects individual liberty. You cannot strip people of their right to property and still call yourself a democracy. This is of course not to mention that all socialist regimes have been authoritarian hellholes whose economic plans have wreaked incalculable havoc upon the world and resulted in millions of people's needless deaths. Socialism is just an excuse for authoritarianism that has never nor will ever accomplish the goals it sets for itself.




So, anti-socialists of NationStates, here are a few questions:
  1. Does socialism still present a threat to the world? To your country?
  2. Should liberals and conservatives do more to square their differences and rally against socialist tides, wherever they may spring up?
  3. At what point is armed resistance against socialism called for?


I knew it! I had a feeling an anti-socialist thread would emerge. Sorry for clogging up space and not contributing anything to the conversation. Have a nice day!
Pro: Environmentalism, Eco-Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy,Progressivism, Pro-choice, Pro-LGTBQ+ rights, Immigration, Bernie Sanders, Juan Guaido (Venezuela) ,Secularism, Palestine And Israel, Internationalism, Alter-Globalization.

Anti: Trump, Conservatism, Traditionalism, Bigotry, That weird TERF movement, Fascism, Stalinism, Totalitarianism, Laissez-faire Free-Market, Libertarianism, Bolsonaro, Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism
We mostly use NS stats.
I'm a Eco-Libertarian Democratic Socialist, or ELDS for short.
Forums that I've posted: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=487988
(this is not a puppet of Penguinya, by the way)

User avatar
Empirical Switzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2895
Founded: Feb 27, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Empirical Switzerland » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:57 pm

There are a lot of leftists on Nationstates, so I expect this to be a really toxic thread...
News: Swiss Man uses 'Fonduethrower' on cow test-subject, lethality confirmed, Priest gets drunk on Blood of Christ, claims he just couldn't handle the Jesusness, and War with Tupeia deemed 'inevitable'.

Click to Declare War on Me | Lord Bodie Q&A
Pro Life, Small Government, Legal Immigrants, 2nd Amendment, Capitalism, Free Markets, and Equal Marriage
Abortion, Large Government, Socialism, Communism, Gun Control, Illegal Immigrants, Pro Choice, Joe Biden, Police Abolishment, and Fascism


Founder of GRAIL
#WalkAway

User avatar
Dominioan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 693
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Dominioan » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:58 pm

I feel bad for you, kinda. I give 2, maybe 3 hours before all the Marxists in this game come to screech at you.

I guess I should give my opinion as well? I'm not "anti-socialism", per say. I am kind of neutral-skeptical-ish on the whole thing.
Last edited by Dominioan on Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everyone calls me Dom. You can call me that too.
Centre-Left something


Founder of my region of about 70, Bluecrown Keep!

Modern "feminism" is a joke, and insulting to those who actually fought hard for women to gain their rights. Change my mind.
Carefully picked facts about the real moi

User avatar
Brettenwald
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 488
Founded: May 03, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Brettenwald » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:58 pm

Empirical Switzerland wrote:There are a lot of leftists on Nationstates, so I expect this to be a really toxic thread...

I'm not even a socialist, I'm just here to watch the carnage and maybe prove people wrong if I feel like it. Want some popcorn?
A Class 1.142 Civilization according to this index.| Brettenwave(プモ) |7/10 according to DGES| Proud signatory to the Amistad Declaration.
Kiu Ghesik wrote:szochiyalizm is whegh the gubamintt dowes stughph
andde whegbn it dus moar stughffpf
izz gobmbnunuismsm
Honeydewistania wrote:Eat the Rich
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. -Mark Twain
20M, bi, history major, former centrist fence-sitter now occupying the lonely nether space between the Warren/Biden and AOC/The Squad wings of the Democratic Party.
My Q&A thread!
PSA: Blue Lives Matter is an inherently false equivalency mocking a real issue in American society. Being a cop is a choice, being black isn't.

User avatar
Punished UMN
Diplomat
 
Posts: 864
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:59 pm

What if I don't mind the use of illiberal and authoritarian means?
Still lurking in the community, but don't expect much engagement.
Rawlsian socialist.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize
Asexual man.

User avatar
Albrenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13445
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Albrenia » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:01 pm

Brettenwald wrote:
Empirical Switzerland wrote:There are a lot of leftists on Nationstates, so I expect this to be a really toxic thread...

I'm not even a socialist, I'm just here to watch the carnage and maybe prove people wrong if I feel like it. Want some popcorn?


*pulls up a chair*

This gonna be good... assuming it doesn't get locked early anyway.

User avatar
The Romanian Confederacy
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: Aug 04, 2020
Anarchy

Postby The Romanian Confederacy » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:02 pm

Let's bet 5,000,000,000 good boy points that this will get shut down in three hours by the corrupt mods.
Don't talk to Moderators.
Don't associate with Moderators.
Don't trust Moderators.
Moderators Lie.

Copy and paste this into your sig if you think we should colonize other planets
Hyperpartisanship will be the downfall of civilized democratic society, it's already in progress as we speak, yet the people are too blinded by their hate to realize it. Dancing polish cow time https://youtu.be/rRPQs_kM_nw

User avatar
-Ra-
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 405
Founded: Aug 09, 2020
Capitalizt

Postby -Ra- » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:02 pm

Punished UMN wrote:What if I don't mind the use of illiberal and authoritarian means?

Illiberal: "opposed to liberal principles; restricting freedom of thought or behavior."

Authoritarian: "favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom."

Fits socialism quite well I'd say.
Notes on the Left | Leftism ought not be understood as a concrete political ideology, but rather as a counterculture movement whose principal aim is the total overthrow of democratic society.

User avatar
Punished UMN
Diplomat
 
Posts: 864
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:04 pm

-Ra- wrote:
Punished UMN wrote:What if I don't mind the use of illiberal and authoritarian means?

Illiberal: "opposed to liberal principles; restricting freedom of thought or behavior."

Authoritarian: "favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom."

Fits socialism quite well I'd say.

I'd say I'm a Rawlsian socialist, but I accept that democracy has its limitations and favor a well-ordered authoritarian state to manage a socialist society.
Still lurking in the community, but don't expect much engagement.
Rawlsian socialist.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize
Asexual man.

User avatar
-Ra-
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 405
Founded: Aug 09, 2020
Capitalizt

Postby -Ra- » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:06 pm

Dominioan wrote:I feel bad for you, kinda. I give 2, maybe 3 hours before all the Marxists in this game come to screech at you.

I guess I should give my opinion as well? I'm not "anti-socialism", per say. I am kind of neutral-skeptical-ish on the whole thing.

I think standing up for your opinions is well worth having to deal with keyboard warriors online.
Notes on the Left | Leftism ought not be understood as a concrete political ideology, but rather as a counterculture movement whose principal aim is the total overthrow of democratic society.

User avatar
Dominioan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 693
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Dominioan » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:07 pm

-Ra- wrote:
Dominioan wrote:I feel bad for you, kinda. I give 2, maybe 3 hours before all the Marxists in this game come to screech at you.

I guess I should give my opinion as well? I'm not "anti-socialism", per say. I am kind of neutral-skeptical-ish on the whole thing.

I think standing up for your opinions is well worth having to deal with keyboard warriors online.

Then go ahead.
Everyone calls me Dom. You can call me that too.
Centre-Left something


Founder of my region of about 70, Bluecrown Keep!

Modern "feminism" is a joke, and insulting to those who actually fought hard for women to gain their rights. Change my mind.
Carefully picked facts about the real moi

User avatar
Parxland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 164
Founded: Apr 21, 2020
Libertarian Police State

Postby Parxland » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:08 pm

Brettenwald wrote:
Empirical Switzerland wrote:There are a lot of leftists on Nationstates, so I expect this to be a really toxic thread...

I'm not even a socialist, I'm just here to watch the carnage and maybe prove people wrong if I feel like it. Want some popcorn?


All the popcorn is mine, and you can't have any! Anti-socialism thread, change my mind. :p

User avatar
Exalted Inquellian State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1516
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Exalted Inquellian State » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:11 pm

If I had a dollar for every time communism worked, I'd have one or two. FOr socialism, I'd have one.
My Three Way Cold War Map Game=https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=486045

User avatar
Kowani
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26112
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:13 pm

Exalted Inquellian State wrote:If I had a dollar for every time communism worked, I'd have one or two. FOr socialism, I'd have one.

Wow. Such comedy, much applause.
Telconi wrote:Every once in a while Kowani does have a decent point.

Kowani wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Also, you could quit being a condescending dick.
I could. But am I going to? Nah.
ni dio, ni rey, ni patria, ni amo

Take nothing I say seriously, unless there is a link.
Currently Reading: The Rights of Man (T. Paine)

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37963
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:21 pm

Does socialism still present a threat to the world? To your country? No, in fact, the US could use a little more socialism.
Should liberals and conservatives do more to square their differences and rally against socialist tides, wherever they may spring up? No. And they wouldn't even have to think about the possibility if they passed reforms on healthcare and other social safety nets and taxed the rich and powerful.
At what point is armed resistance against socialism called for? Never.

Any other questions?
Last edited by New haven america on Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2020

That's all folks~

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66244
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Genivaria » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:22 pm

This looks like a Reddit page honestly.
Liberal Social Democrat. Vague leftist, growing more cynical as each day passes.
The DNC is better than the GOP like Manslaughter is better than Murder: Seems like a lesser crime, but the victim can't tell the difference.

User avatar
Dominioan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 693
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Dominioan » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:24 pm

Does socialism still present a threat to the world? To your country?
No.

Should liberals and conservatives do more to square their differences and rally against socialist tides, wherever they may spring up?
Yes, by passing actual reforms to help the poor and working.

At what point is armed resistance against socialism called for?
When they become Soviet-style authoritarian socialists.
Everyone calls me Dom. You can call me that too.
Centre-Left something


Founder of my region of about 70, Bluecrown Keep!

Modern "feminism" is a joke, and insulting to those who actually fought hard for women to gain their rights. Change my mind.
Carefully picked facts about the real moi

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37963
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:25 pm

Genivaria wrote:This looks like a Reddit page honestly.

The irony being that Reddit is super socialist atm.

Seriously, you couldn't go 1 day without seeing Bernie's face on the front page when he was running.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2020

That's all folks~

User avatar
All Wild Things
Envoy
 
Posts: 241
Founded: Apr 24, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby All Wild Things » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:25 pm

"It's important to remember that socialism is not universal healthcare, public roads, free public education, taxes, unions, or "the government doing stuff." These are social policies, not socialist policies, and they are all perfectly compatible with capitalism."

What about publicly owned rail networks, electricity grids, gas pipelines, water and sewerage pipelines, telephone networks, broadband networks. They're all kind of like public roads aren't they? Are these all perfectly compatible with capitalism too?

If the government can choose to give universal healthcare and education, and still not be socialist, can they give out food too? Food is essential for staying healthy. As is exercise. Can we get universal gym memberships and still be capitalists?

User avatar
Bienenhalde
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5511
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Bienenhalde » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:25 pm

I don't see the point of being anti-socialist, because the word socialist is so vague and people can't seem to agree what it actually means. But I am strongly anti-communist.
Bienenhalde (mostly) represents my real political views.
https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=75.6&d=68.6&g=38.8&s=45.2
OOC:
[*]Age: 24 [*]Pennsylvania Dutch [*]ELCA Lutheran [*]Male [*]Bisexual - leaning towards gay [*]Independent [*]Sinophile-Japanophile [*]Monarchist [*]Has Asperger's

User avatar
The Marlborough
Diplomat
 
Posts: 713
Founded: May 27, 2020
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Marlborough » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:27 pm

Punished UMN wrote:What if I don't mind the use of illiberal and authoritarian means?

This tbh.
Monarchist. Communitarian-Distributist. Eastern Orthodox Christian. Anti-Canadian nationalism. Postliberal. Traditionalists and conservatives should give up on trying to work within liberalism. You cannot preserve tradition in a system whose existence is in part meant to destroy it.
Somewhat of a Slavophile, Hispanophile, Persophile and Indophile.
Everything for the people, nothing by the people - Emperor Joseph II
If I could wish immortality on earth, it would only be for the power of relieving the distressed - Maria Theresa
A playlist of medieval music for your enjoyment while you waste time here.
Support the Lil Red Dress Project to bring awareness to MMIWG.

User avatar
Albrenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13445
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Albrenia » Sat Oct 10, 2020 3:27 pm

Bienenhalde wrote:I don't see the point of being anti-socialist, because the word socialist is so vague and people can't seem to agree what it actually means. But I am strongly anti-communist.


Yeah, Communism sucks, I'll agree there.

We could all use a little socialism in our lives though.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Albrenia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Conservative Republic Of Huang, Geneviev, Greed and Death, Grinning Dragon, Kyundao, Linkers Sha, Nobel Hobos 2, Ossric, The Marlborough, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads