Ali Ahmed Khan asks “permission to cross-examine the witness”.
“Granted” says the Judge-Advocate.
“How do you know the reason he ordered them to open fire wasn’t because he thought they had killed the disabled gentleman?”
He asked
Advertisement
by Ideal Britain » Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:20 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:55 am
Ideal Britain wrote:Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Her account confirms the version of events told by John Robson.
Ali Ahmed Khan asks “permission to cross-examine the witness”.
“Granted” says the Judge-Advocate.
“How do you know the reason he ordered them to open fire wasn’t because he thought they had killed the disabled gentleman?”
He asked
by Ideal Britain » Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:21 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Ideal Britain wrote:Ali Ahmed Khan asks “permission to cross-examine the witness”.
“Granted” says the Judge-Advocate.
“How do you know the reason he ordered them to open fire wasn’t because he thought they had killed the disabled gentleman?”
He asked
"The Lieutenant-Colonel himself admitted at the time that the police had killed the man."
by Nationalist Northumbria » Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:24 am
by Ideal Britain » Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:44 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:42 am
Ideal Britain wrote:Nationalist Northumbria wrote:"Positive enough that I did not think that they would kill innocent civilians."
“The prosecution rests” say Major (retired) Arthur MacDonald
The board of officers and warrant officers finds him guilty.
A sentence is given of 2 years at the Military Corrective Training Centre (Colchester barracks) and a dismissal from His Majesty’s service.
The relatively lenient sentence is explain to be “due to his clean record and prior good character as well as the extenuating circumstances.”
by Ideal Britain » Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:59 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Ideal Britain wrote:
“The prosecution rests” say Major (retired) Arthur MacDonald
The board of officers and warrant officers finds him guilty.
A sentence is given of 2 years at the Military Corrective Training Centre (Colchester barracks) and a dismissal from His Majesty’s service.
The relatively lenient sentence is explain to be “due to his clean record and prior good character as well as the extenuating circumstances.”
Northumbrians protest this lenient sentence.
by Nationalist Northumbria » Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:07 am
Ideal Britain wrote:Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Northumbrians protest this lenient sentence.
These Northumbrians are responded to with
“Well let’s see how your troops behave under pressure when you have a civil emergency.
He lost an excellent career in the Army because of something he did to protect people.”
by Ideal Britain » Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:23 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Ideal Britain wrote:These Northumbrians are responded to with
“Well let’s see how your troops behave under pressure when you have a civil emergency.
He lost an excellent career in the Army because of something he did to protect people.”
"How are you protecting people by killing hundreds of peaceful protesters for no reason?" they respond in turn.
by Nationalist Northumbria » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:04 am
by Ideal Britain » Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:28 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:52 pm
by Ideal Britain » Fri Aug 14, 2020 3:34 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Heldervin
Advertisement