Retired WerePenguins wrote:There seems to be an implicit assumption that employment is continual and perpetual but that is not the case in the resolution, "a 'worker' as any individual bound by a contract ..."
The full definition in the proposal is "a 'worker' [is] any individual bound by a contract to perform work or services for an employer, whose employment contract mandates the work or services be performed specifically by that worker, involves an obligation for the worker to perform work and the employer to provide it, and implies the employer having some degree of control over the manner in which the work is performed." The last part is important; this is the common-law test, and is used to distinguish employment relationships by the US IRS and other agencies.