NATION

PASSWORD

Streamed musician pay - fair money?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Streamed musician pay - fair money?

Postby Petrolheadia » Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:06 pm

A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5969
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Uiiop » Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:26 pm

Petrolheadia wrote:A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?

Art is it's own reward. Not nessiclry a thing that can override bitching about money but one that continuing to make it doesn't mean they secretly agree on their worth.
How does your armchair psychoanalysis square with people who are worthy enough to get by in this industry still complaining about it? It's not just the "Deservedly poor" complaining about this.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6047
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:38 pm

Next thing you know they're gonna blame the people and their fans who stream their music for free rather than buy their songs on iTunes. If you're a successful recording artist like Taylor Swift for example, frankly you need to calm down.
22 year old, PA male. Love sports like baseball, hockey and American football, enjoy video games and TV. Music chart nerd, can't live without it. I'm gay. Anti-government revolutionary, one's terrorist is another's freedom fighter

Revolution for America
Imagine being shocked about the fact of greed, corruption, and abuse of power in government.
The media is a propaganda tool fueling the two parties hyperpartisanship and killing the country, it's time to end the "freedom of the press"
Violence against the government is and should be accepted by the people, especially when said government wants to and tries to strip away your constitutional rights.
Doesn't matter Democrat or Republican, both parties need to be abolished and their politicians arrested.

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16170
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:45 pm

Simple: if you don't like how much streaming pays, then only make your music available in formats that require people to pay for it.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6047
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:51 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:Simple: if you don't like how much streaming pays, then only make your music available in formats that require people to pay for it.

That strategy may have worked about 10-15 years ago, now it doesn't work like that. Streaming is the future, they have to get over it, or move on from their career as a musician. People are not buying shit on iTunes en masse like they were several years ago, people are choosing to stream it on Spotify, or YouTube, where it's readily available.
22 year old, PA male. Love sports like baseball, hockey and American football, enjoy video games and TV. Music chart nerd, can't live without it. I'm gay. Anti-government revolutionary, one's terrorist is another's freedom fighter

Revolution for America
Imagine being shocked about the fact of greed, corruption, and abuse of power in government.
The media is a propaganda tool fueling the two parties hyperpartisanship and killing the country, it's time to end the "freedom of the press"
Violence against the government is and should be accepted by the people, especially when said government wants to and tries to strip away your constitutional rights.
Doesn't matter Democrat or Republican, both parties need to be abolished and their politicians arrested.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 113963
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Aug 01, 2020 5:13 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:Simple: if you don't like how much streaming pays, then only make your music available in formats that require people to pay for it.

That strategy may have worked about 10-15 years ago, now it doesn't work like that. Streaming is the future, they have to get over it, or move on from their career as a musician. People are not buying shit on iTunes en masse like they were several years ago, people are choosing to stream it on Spotify, or YouTube, where it's readily available.

Only sell to services that pay you a rate you are happy with.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Major-Tom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14868
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Aug 01, 2020 5:17 pm

It's such a highly subjective question, I'd say it should be up to the artist(s) to decide whether they want to be streamed on Spotify or not, and whether or not they feel strongly enough to try to negotiate with the streaming service.
"We're flawed because we want so much. We're ruined because we get these things and wish for what we had."
Who is Tom?
Other Pertinent Factbooks

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7146
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:48 pm

I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.
Last edited by Sundiata on Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
Soiled fruit roll ups
Envoy
 
Posts: 251
Founded: Jun 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Soiled fruit roll ups » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:24 pm

Petrolheadia wrote:A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?


Does Spotify even have any competition?
I actually can't think of any.

Maybe wanna look at breaking it up.
JAGERA/TURRBULL/YEERONGPAN
FIRST NATION AUSTRALIAN - ABORIGINAL

The United States is also a one party system but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.- Julius Nyerere.

User avatar
Praising GFriend Eunha Thiccness
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 23, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Praising GFriend Eunha Thiccness » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:27 pm

One thing's for sure: GFriend deserves all the money in the world.

User avatar
Asle Leopolka
Diplomat
 
Posts: 840
Founded: Oct 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Asle Leopolka » Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:21 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:Simple: if you don't like how much streaming pays, then only make your music available in formats that require people to pay for it.

That strategy may have worked about 10-15 years ago, now it doesn't work like that. Streaming is the future, they have to get over it, or move on from their career as a musician. People are not buying shit on iTunes en masse like they were several years ago, people are choosing to stream it on Spotify, or YouTube, where it's readily available.

Seriously. Garth Brooks is the biggest star voicing this and he's too stubborn to realize how wrong he is.

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:
Petrolheadia wrote:A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?


Does Spotify even have any competition?
I actually can't think of any.

Maybe wanna look at breaking it up.

Pandora, Last.FM, iHeartRadio, SiriusXM, Apple Music, and Youtube all immediately come to mind.
W̵̲͔͇͒̌̉̆̇͛̋ͅa̸̢̼̺̅̉̊͝l̶̟͈̳̗͒͜l̷̫͝ ̶̱̱̘͖̙̬͖̈́̏̕͘ō̴̼̭̥͔̮̟͒̒͒ͅn̴̖̦͎̯͕̈́̿͘͠ ̸̞̼͉͙́͐̏͝ẗ̴̮͕̰̫̖͉̩̍͆̂͛͝h̵̖̋̉̾̎͆e̸̞̩̳̲͙͎͑ ̴̩̈̽̈́͑S̵̯̮̟͈͎̭͠t̸͍̗̹̬͉̙̓͆̔̿r̸̡̤̺̱̹͈̦͑̈́̅ẹ̶̮͔̳̆͆̄̏̔e̴̢̺͚̠̟͕̋̄̂̓̽͘t̴̢̡̩͙̫̼̚,̸̩̖͌̈́͐̇ ̷̨͐͆P̵̳̦͗r̶̹̪̯͕̬̰̍̓͆o̷̠̱͙̠͔̗̫̽f̶̱͙͇̼̬̮̻̊͌̋į̸̯̩̖͇̍͋̓̾́̏̽ͅt̴͇̬͍̗̺̀̈́̈́͗͊ ̴̧̯̼̩͑̓̒͗i̷̪̲̜̮̼̲̎͑͊̂̕n̶͍̂ ̴͓̻̤̬͎̫̹̎͌̈́́̕͝t̸̺͚͍̕h̷͖͎̙͍̬̫̰̍̀̃̿̓e̷̛̩̔̑̌̾͊ ̵̤̖͎͔͖̂͘͝S̴̳͖̩̪͕̒͒̌͌͝h̷̝͇̱̝̻̓̓͂͑̒ȅ̶̛̞̱̮̏͐͜ḕ̷͙͉̄͜ť̸̫̩̟s̴̲̲̏̑̏̇͆͂͘͜

ᛖᚷᛟ ᛋᚢᛗ ᛒᛖᛋᛏᛁᚨ ᛖᚷᛟ ᚲᚢᛚᛏᚢᛋ
Personality: Chaotic Good | ENTJ | Math dominant | Pro business
Politically: Classical liberal | Pro 2A | Pro Choice | Behavioral economist

User avatar
Nuroblav
Minister
 
Posts: 2352
Founded: Nov 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nuroblav » Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:38 am

Music isn't about money...it's about...music? This reminds me a lot of Lars Ulrich whining about people listening to his band's music for free. Money shouldn't be a problem for already successful artists (although I don't know who specifically is complaining).
Your NS mutualist(?), individualist, metalhead and all-round...err...human. TG if you have any questions about my political or musical views.

Economic Left/Right: -4.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.03

\m/ METAL IS BASED \m/

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Minister
 
Posts: 2242
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby -Ocelot- » Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:56 am

Nuroblav wrote:Music isn't about money...it's about...music? This reminds me a lot of Lars Ulrich whining about people listening to his band's music for free. Money shouldn't be a problem for already successful artists (although I don't know who specifically is complaining).


I agree with this. You should work all day long to produce quality music, and I should listen it for free, no strings attached. Seems like a fair exchange.

User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrolheadia » Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:37 am

Asle Leopolka wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:That strategy may have worked about 10-15 years ago, now it doesn't work like that. Streaming is the future, they have to get over it, or move on from their career as a musician. People are not buying shit on iTunes en masse like they were several years ago, people are choosing to stream it on Spotify, or YouTube, where it's readily available.

Seriously. Garth Brooks is the biggest star voicing this and he's too stubborn to realize how wrong he is.

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:
Does Spotify even have any competition?
I actually can't think of any.

Maybe wanna look at breaking it up.

Pandora, Last.FM, iHeartRadio, SiriusXM, Apple Music, and Youtube all immediately come to mind.

Plus buying the physical copies.
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrolheadia » Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:38 am

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:
Petrolheadia wrote:A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?


Does Spotify even have any competition?
I actually can't think of any.

Maybe wanna look at breaking it up.

One of my issues with democracy is that people who don't know about Apple Music or YouTube Music are supposed to speak on whether Spotify is a monopoly.
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrolheadia » Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:41 am

Sundiata wrote:I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.

What about the legions of people who changed music without that? Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, The Beatles, The Kinks, The Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zeppelin, Grandmaster Flash, N.W.A...
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7211
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
New York Times Democracy

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:02 am

How much do Spotify make per stream?
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Twicetagram and JYPe
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1355
Founded: Feb 27, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Twicetagram and JYPe » Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:18 am

I don't really know. Spotify is like THE major music streaming app. No one uses iTunes or Groove music anymore. If they have problems maybe they should move to Soundcloud, but I'm not sure if Soundcloud has a streamed musician pay.

Edit: One more thing. If Spotify makes like a few percent of money from streaming then it's fine but I think most of the moneys should go to the artists who actually (make and) post the music.
Last edited by Twicetagram and JYPe on Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
i can't believe

User avatar
Nuroblav
Minister
 
Posts: 2352
Founded: Nov 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nuroblav » Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:31 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Sundiata wrote:I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.

What about the legions of people who changed music without that? Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, The Beatles, The Kinks, The Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zeppelin, Grandmaster Flash, N.W.A...

There are definitely a lot of them...
Your NS mutualist(?), individualist, metalhead and all-round...err...human. TG if you have any questions about my political or musical views.

Economic Left/Right: -4.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.03

\m/ METAL IS BASED \m/

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:36 am

Uiiop wrote:
Petrolheadia wrote:A lot of musicians and music fans are criticising Spotify's streaming payouts, which are currently sitting at $0.0032 a stream, claiming that such low numbers are exploitative of the artists. Similar criticism is handed to other streaming sites, which don't seem to pay big money.

But my opinion is that they don't show the issue with streaming, but with music. A lot of musicians don't think about whether music pays enough, or whether they should look into a different field - they just go into an industry that pays pennies, and then complain about the nature of the field they voluntarily entered, instead of asking themselves whether the world needs another white boy with an acoustic guitar or black boy with a couple or rhymes. They keep complaining, and yet release their songs online - maybe because deep down they realise that this is how much their music is worth?

And what do you think? Do musicians deserve more money than that?

Art is it's own reward. Not nessiclry a thing that can override bitching about money but one that continuing to make it doesn't mean they secretly agree on their worth.
How does your armchair psychoanalysis square with people who are worthy enough to get by in this industry still complaining about it? It's not just the "Deservedly poor" complaining about this.

Greed.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63744
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:48 am

Sundiata wrote:I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.


I've found that the better musicians are the local street buskers. There's this one lady who plays some mean spoons and I love her.

Today I learned she has a Wikipedia page
Last edited by Kannap on Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
24 years old, gay asexual, male Presbyterian, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident ostrich
Political Party: Not affiliated/Independent
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
Luna Amore wrote:note to self, insert clever reference to Kannap
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7146
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:23 pm

Kannap wrote:
Sundiata wrote:I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.


I've found that the better musicians are the local street buskers. There's this one lady who plays some mean spoons and I love her.

Today I learned she has a Wikipedia page

Are you just making a point of believing the opposite of everything I do? :p
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7146
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:31 pm

Petrolheadia wrote:
Sundiata wrote:I personally would recommend becoming a music teacher or professor before trying to work as a musician. And before that, a trained student of music.

I've found that the better musicians are educated.

What about the legions of people who changed music without that? Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, The Beatles, The Kinks, The Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zeppelin, Grandmaster Flash, N.W.A...

Most popular musicians are fantastic artists but there are few who have actually mastered music as a discipline.

The best way of doing so is to receive a proper education in music. This can range from a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or even the doctorate level.

The doctoral level is where the greatest experts reside, more often than not.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5969
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Uiiop » Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:45 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Petrolheadia wrote:What about the legions of people who changed music without that? Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, The Beatles, The Kinks, The Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zeppelin, Grandmaster Flash, N.W.A...

Most popular musicians are fantastic artists but there are few who have actually mastered music as a discipline.

The best way of doing so is to receive a proper education in music. This can range from a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or even the doctorate level.

The doctoral level is where the greatest experts reside, more often than not.

Universities grant that shit honoris causa tho so the very people you decided as the arbiter of musician legitimacy doesn't actually share your standards.

This ignores the fact the OP defines betternot as "What's Sundiata personal standards" but "Who gets paid more". A quick glance at my link shows that becoming a professor doesn't bring in the big bucks.

Mind you i respect your standards more than Petrol's "Pretend the music industry isn't propped up at least partially by cronyism and believe in the just world fallacy" if only because the former actually has one. It's just that it's not related to the point.
Last edited by Uiiop on Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63744
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:47 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Kannap wrote:
I've found that the better musicians are the local street buskers. There's this one lady who plays some mean spoons and I love her.

Today I learned she has a Wikipedia page

Are you just making a point of believing the opposite of everything I do? :p


You stated your opinion, I stated mine. You don't have to be educated to be talented.
24 years old, gay asexual, male Presbyterian, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident ostrich
Political Party: Not affiliated/Independent
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
Luna Amore wrote:note to self, insert clever reference to Kannap
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Austreylia, Bing [Bot], Britannic New England, Drew Durrnil, Esalia, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Heloin, Jerzylvania, Kotok, Kowani, Lady Victory, Latorik, Loeje, Nakena, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Necroghastia, New Technocratic Prussia, Ostroeuropa, Saiwania, Shrillland, Suriyanakhon, The Holy Therns, Vassenor, Wallenburg, Western Fardelshufflestein

Advertisement

Remove ads