NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Standards for international road freight

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Rivierenland
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 09, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

[DRAFT] Standards for international road freight

Postby Rivierenland » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:45 am

Whilst some countries choose to open up their borders to any foreign power, whether it be for trade, travel, work, et cetera, other countries don't (understandably, since it's their choice to do so). Whilst it's important to maintain a nation's sovereignty, it's also important to stimulate trade between countries and with closed borders that will make it more complicated to do so.

And while some countries will most likely oppose this bill, it's important to understand that this isn't a complete change to force everyone to open up their borders, but instead this bill is only meant to try and set small steps in that direction, whilst still keeping most of the issues of border control to the nation's themselves. This bill is only meant to enact open borders for international road freight

If the World Assembly may:

1. Definitions

a. International road freight means freight moved on land by trucks, vans and every other land-purpose vehicle
b. When referring to nations, all non-isolationist nations within the World Assembly are being mentioned
c. resolution means General Assembly resolution
d. Bill also refers to General Assembly resolution
e. Logistical travel refers to the travel of international road freight

2. Cooperation

All members should work in keeping their borders open to international road freight travel at all times, except in situations in where the nations see fit to close their borders to international road freight (during a pandemic, war, threat of attack, et cetera). Nations are also stimulated to make agreements with each other on certain terms of the freely travelling international road freight.

3. Non-exclusivity

No nations are allowed to;
a. Make agreements with other nations to only allow the travel of international road freight provided by some companies. All logistical ventures should be allowed to pass freely from nation to nation.
b. Make agreements with other nations to close the borders completely, thus overriding this resolution, without a good reason to do so in the first place.
c. Withhold the necessary tools for the international road freight (infrastructure, staff, equipment, vehicles) to travel between two nations.
d. Fail to implement policies aiding free logistical travel and implement policies meant to restrict the international road freight from travelling freely.

4. Exceptions

Unless stated other wise by a previous resolution, as said in section 2, nations are allowed to disobey this resolution if there's an event that could pose a threat to the nation and the logistical travel. Reasons include war, global health crises, threat of attack (either by foreign power or independent organisation), natural disaster, civil unrest, et cetera.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6997
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:48 am

Rivierenland wrote:d. Bill also refers to General Assembly resolution

At the top of your post, you have two paragraphs beginning "Whilst some countries..." and "And while some countries..." respectively. Are those supposed to be part of your resolution text?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador ~ Achievements
3 SC Resolutions + 0 co-authored:
A: SC#250, Repeal "Liberate Femdom Empire" (87%)
A: SC#251, Commend Alasdair I Frosticus (91%)
A: SC#267, Repeal "Liberate The East Pacific" (90%)

1 GA Resolution + 1 co-authored:
A: GA#484, Disease Naming Compact (54%)
C: GA#491, Rights of the employed (54%)

0 Issues + 1 co-authored:
C: #1115, One in the Arm for @@LEADER@@?

73rd Cup of Harmony - CHAMPIONS

User avatar
Rivierenland
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 09, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Rivierenland » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:49 am

Tinhampton wrote:
Rivierenland wrote:d. Bill also refers to General Assembly resolution

At the top of your post, you have two paragraphs beginning "Whilst some countries..." and "And while some countries..." respectively. Are those supposed to be part of your resolution text?

Yes, i wrote them as an opener for this resolution

User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4958
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:59 am

OOC:
For the record, mandating open borders to trade like this, is uh, probably not the best of ideas.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: Subspace Barrier secured, Aeravahn incursion withdraws from Interior Territories | Military Overseer executed, 4th Fleet Saraali Avalis Saar succeeding, announces Military Reform | Civil Oversight suspends Development Plans | 42nd Legion Teravas Illaren Errent defects to Aeravahn following discovery of involvement in destruction of Hathien | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9593
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:01 pm

Open borders is a great free lunch of an idea. It's just politically unpalatable. As I communicated to the author in the WA Discord, I think the proposal could take an interesting turn towards non-discrimination between firms engaging in trade writ large. It could be similar to IRL WTO indirect state aid regulations.

Author: 1 SC and 34 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4958
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:05 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Open borders is a great free lunch of an idea. It's just politically unpalatable. As I communicated to the author in the WA Discord, I think the proposal could take an interesting turn towards non-discrimination between firms engaging in trade writ large. It could be similar to IRL WTO indirect state aid regulations.


OOC:
Don't we already have such a law though?
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: Subspace Barrier secured, Aeravahn incursion withdraws from Interior Territories | Military Overseer executed, 4th Fleet Saraali Avalis Saar succeeding, announces Military Reform | Civil Oversight suspends Development Plans | 42nd Legion Teravas Illaren Errent defects to Aeravahn following discovery of involvement in destruction of Hathien | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Anurial
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Feb 17, 2020
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Anurial » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:05 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Open borders is a great free lunch of an idea. It's just politically unpalatable. As I communicated to the author in the WA Discord, I think the proposal could take an interesting turn towards non-discrimination between firms engaging in trade writ large. It could be similar to IRL WTO indirect state aid regulations.


I second this suggestion. Total freedom of movement is not politically viable, but legislating non-discrimination is a good route for this resolution to go down.
"When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called "the People's Stick".

Free Land of Anurial

4th August 2020
✉ Anarquía Mirror: Strikes sweep across Karsia as new labour laws extend legal workweek to 60 hours ¦ Pesian President backs Anurialian calls for Tacarada to respect Brindak requests ¦ Anurial First leader, Santiago Abascal, calls for a leader that will "protect from, not serve foreign interests" ¦ Politipoll: PSF 48%, PDS 30%, NLA 11%, SU 5%, AF 6%


User avatar
Rivierenland
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 09, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Rivierenland » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:15 pm

I have looked at all of the replies to this thread and i'd just want to say that i have read them, and tomorrow i'll try and change my proposal accordingly


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads