Advertisement
by Dimension Facilities » Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:34 pm
by WayNeacTia » Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:09 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Comfed wrote:Very disappointed to see regional delegates rely on stomping once again to crush proposals they don’t like.
Most of the against votes appear to be coming from TEP, XKI, LKE and whatever abbreviation Enadia's using today. Many major delegates have not voted yet; regardless, thank you for your continued faith in this proposal.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Refuge Isle » Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:30 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Tinhampton wrote:Most of the against votes appear to be coming from TEP, XKI, LKE and whatever abbreviation Enadia's using today. Many major delegates have not voted yet; regardless, thank you for your continued faith in this proposal.
You made the conscious decision to make things political when you interfered with a resolution you had no business being involved with. Now you reap what you sow.
by The Novakian Empire » Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:58 pm
About Me White canadian male. Call me caleb. Pro: Palestine,Syrian Gov,Federal Quebec,Our lord and savior Cthulu,And bear grylls. Neutral: Meh Con: Israeli Government,erdogan,The PQ,Trump,ISIL,and Misandrists. | | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [Normal] Head of Government: Prime Minister Thomas Schmidt Head of State: Emperor Erik Novakai Population: 48 Million Armed Forces: 1.2 Million Active, 4.8 Million Reserves | Nothing's really happening in novakia at the moment. | | Sigs 'n shit. "The Internet is dark and full of boners." -Daniel O' Brien WARNING:This nation represents my RL views. |
by Outer Sparta » Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:24 pm
The Novakian Empire wrote:How did this even come to a vote? Against.
by Kronomia » Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:31 pm
by Refuge Isle » Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:32 pm
Kronomia wrote:Genuine question from someone who rarely engages in WA debates: is it normal for the WA to condemn a nation based on their stats (e.g. extremely high poverty, nonexistent civil rights, extreme corruption, etc.)? Or is a resolution like this generally considered nonsense and a waste of time?
by North Saitama » Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:38 pm
by Goobergunchia » Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:59 pm
Refuge Isle wrote:Our position is largely that, although stats-based C&Cs are a valid form of resolution, and although the target may even merit it, the resolution isn't really constructed in a proper format to justify passing this. The proposal reads like a forum posts that's going through a list of observations which would not have any real weight. There's impressive #1, 2, and 3 rank badges on this nation, but it's sidetracked and distracted from by mentioning that it's in the 60s in some stats and four thousanth in fishing. Well, I'm 15th in the world in fishing and that's more of a novelty than anything.
I like to view SC resolutions as things that tell a good story. Something that builds the idea of what a nation does or is and whether or not its legacy and tales of adventure are IC good or evil. This condemnation does not provide that, it's just like reading the nation's auto-generated text on its front page. So, basically, IMO it's possible to condemn Borland, just probably not like this.
HORRIFIED at the realisation that any semblance of a judicial branch has been abolished, which - when combined with the fifth-rudest and sixth-most armed populace in the world, undoubtedly a byproduct of mandatory military service for citizens - has led to Northern Borland recording the second-highest death rate, 11th-highest crime rate and 132nd-highest youth crime rate of all nations;
by The New State of Wales » Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:48 am
by Smart Land » Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:41 am
by Comfed » Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:40 am
The New State of Wales wrote:Hi, I am sorta new to the WA. Can I ask, why is this Condemnation targeting the stats of the nation in question? I do not believe the stats of one's account usually reflects the beliefs of the person using it, as it is mostly out of control of the player what stats one gains when answering issues.
by Tiberia Maritima » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:32 am
by WayNeacTia » Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:31 pm
Comfed wrote:The New State of Wales wrote:Hi, I am sorta new to the WA. Can I ask, why is this Condemnation targeting the stats of the nation in question? I do not believe the stats of one's account usually reflects the beliefs of the person using it, as it is mostly out of control of the player what stats one gains when answering issues.
Condemnations aren’t always “bad”. The second “Condemn the Black Hawks” was the essentially a badge of honour for being so good at raiding. This isn’t always true, but in this case it is.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Comfed » Thu Oct 22, 2020 4:09 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Comfed wrote:Condemnations aren’t always “bad”. The second “Condemn the Black Hawks” was the essentially a badge of honour for being so good at raiding. This isn’t always true, but in this case it is.
Perhaps you should learn to read a statement before responding to it. You have an unfortunate habit of not doing this. Nowhere in that post did the poster state anywhere that they believe the nation itself is bad. They questioned the validity of condemning based purely on stats.
The New State of Wales wrote:I do not believe the stats of one's account usually reflects the beliefs of the person using it
by Kaputer » Fri Oct 23, 2020 12:07 am
by Honeydewistania » Fri Oct 23, 2020 3:03 am
Kaputer wrote:I haven't been playing close attention to this game outside my region Capitalist Paradise (where I am the most influential). Why Northern Borland is being insulted with this resolution is beside me.
NB has contributed so much to this game and the idea that he be condemned is outrageous. The BS of the World Assembly allowing things like this to get to a general vote is a problem with our system.
I'm happy to help with the commend NB resolution.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Duncanheim » Fri Oct 23, 2020 5:00 am
by Eluney » Fri Oct 23, 2020 5:52 pm
by Euroda » Sat Oct 24, 2020 6:42 am
Jikucia wrote:Jikucia usually does not partake in SC proposals. However, Tinhampton's mass telegram has prompted this nation to take a formal stance. Jikucia votes AGAINST this condemnation.
by Cornfederacy of Corn » Sat Oct 24, 2020 6:49 am
by Federative States of America » Sat Oct 24, 2020 6:52 am
by Tinhampton » Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:20 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:07 am
Tinhampton wrote:"Condemn Northern Borland" was defeated 10,421 votes to 3,217.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement