[quote="Savoir";p="37216713"][/quote]
OOC: Please be ironic, please be ironic, please be ironic
Advertisement
by Honeydewistania » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:56 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Heavens Reach » Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:03 am
"Fellow fascists, all those who are voting against this proposal, I salute you!"
by Araraukar » Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:07 pm
Heavens Reach wrote:"Fellow fascists, all those who are voting against this proposal, I salute you!"
This is the strongest argument for a vote of "for" that we've seen.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Devionsa » Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:59 am
by Honeydewistania » Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 am
Devionsa wrote:I know most voters won't read this forum but I am hoping there are enough of those who do that can change the predictable result.
I think most voters didn't even read the proposal but just read banning blood sports and voted against. The proposal clearly states banning sports where the participants haven't given their consent and are being forced. Also sports where death is a highly possible outcome which is clearly indirect murder by the organisers and the spectators. Bloodsports involving animals is even more troubling since they can neither give consent and are more than likely to be killed regardless if they win or not, if not immediately then probably after they can no longer be considered in a fighting condition.
Freedom and liberty are the most basic rights any living being deserves but the participants in the sports that this proposal is asking to ban aren't being allowed any freedom. It specifically states banning non-consensual events and/or events where deaths are highly likely to occur, which would entail murder, direct or indirect, which is illegal in most nations.
I ask everyone to reconsider their votes if they have voted against and/or vote "for" if they haven't voted yet.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by The Anarchic Collective of Z » Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:45 am
by Wallenburg » Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:22 am
"Restrictions On Blood Sports" was defeated 11,568 votes to 8,988.
by Honeydewistania » Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:25 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"Restrictions On Blood Sports" was defeated 11,568 votes to 8,988.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement