NATION

PASSWORD

Protect the Weaker Countries

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Should We Create An International Guard to protect weaker Countries from war?

Poll ended at Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:25 am

For it
6
26%
Against it
17
74%
 
Total votes : 23

User avatar
Valencea
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 26, 2020
Ex-Nation

Protect the Weaker Countries

Postby Valencea » Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:25 am

I and my Country, "Valencea" propose a protection fund that will ensure the protection of weaker countriesvthat are under devolopment or going through hard times we should protect them from war striking they're lands by setting up an international guard force that will protect all countries in the world assembly and all other countries who want to join this cause. i believe this is the next step for democracy. i we should take this step for our countries and ou people.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13703
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:40 am

Illegal under the Committee-Only Rule. Irreversably illegal due to contradiction of GA#2 "Rights and Duties of WA States," Article 10... unless you repeal GA#2 first, which is very unlikely.

Rules for GA Proposals - read at all costs.
A searchable list of all GA resolutions except GA#484 (which will probably get repealed on Sunday anyway) - read as and when appropriate.
Last edited by Tinhampton on Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Heliosbrine
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jan 24, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Heliosbrine » Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:59 am

yes those weaker countries are needing help we should provide protection

User avatar
The Democracy of Red Star
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Sep 07, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Democracy of Red Star » Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:01 am

It’s 50/50
The Democracy Of Red Star
About me; A Star Trek fan that got bored with making a nation, who now spends most of his time on NS doing whatever he finds fun.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:13 am

The Democracy of Red Star wrote:It’s 50/50

So? Rules are rules, and this breaks several.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Rotenbergen
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Mar 22, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Rotenbergen » Thu Apr 09, 2020 5:53 pm

Protecting weak countries requires additional funding and valuable resources that can be used to solve my own country's problems. We don't favor being the world's police force.

User avatar
Wind Flower
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 10
Founded: Feb 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Beggars can't be choosers.

Postby Wind Flower » Sun Apr 12, 2020 9:22 am

I will only vow to protect weaker countries if they can provide something in return for me. Our nation has far too long come to the aid of those beneath us only to be offered little to nothing in return. Why must we sacrifice our resources to those who cannot replenish us? We are superior and remain superior for a reason.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads