NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT 2] An Untimely Termination

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

[DRAFT 2] An Untimely Termination

Postby SherpDaWerp » Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:04 pm

Surprised we don't have any issues around ministers resigning! I searched the spoiler thread for resign - all that came up was people saying "This person should resign!".


Title: An Untimely Resignation

Description

Just yesterday, @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@ - the elected member for Upper @@ANIMAL@@ville - unfortunately died when the new hospital he was inspecting suffered a partial collapse. Also unfortunately, a previously scheduled national election was coming up in a few months, clouding the sad news with trepidation from the @@DEMONYM@@ public, who aren't keen for by-election mere months before another vote.
Validity
Democracy, No Proportional Representation

Option 1
"Look, I know it sounds bad, but you could just institute an 'Interim MP', someone to act in @@HIS(1)@@ stead, just until the election," posits @@RANDOMNAME(2)@@, a long-time supporter of your party. "It wouldn't be long, just a few months, and it would save the hassle and cost of another election. Sure, some might not be happy with your decision, but that doesn't matter. I know just the candidate..."
Validity
All
Outcome
ministers who disagree with @@LEADER@@ have a lot of accidents

Option 2
"Whoa, hey. No need to get all autocratic there," interjects @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, the Leader of the Opposition. "Just have the by-election, same as we would in any other case. Strange @@MEN(1)@@, lying on hospital beds, kicking the bucket is no basis for a system of government! Noone knows who's the next candidate the people might want, so let's just have the by-election and find out."
Validity
All
Outcome
a recent flu outbreak in @@CAPITAL@@ has seen by-elections across the country

Option 3
"Ahem. Actually, I know exactly who's the next candidate the people want," states @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, an independent member who only narrowly lost to @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@ in the last election. "Me! I was the candidate with the next most votes, so in the event of @@HIS(1)@@ untimely resignation, I should be given the role."
Validity
All
Outcome
candidates who lose elections watch their opponent's health intently

Option 4
"Pffft. Why do they even need an MP?" derisively asks @@RANDOMNAME(4)@@, who lives in the electorate of Lower @@ANIMAL@@ville. "Those toffs from Upper @@ANIMAL@@ville always get all the funding, and you forget about us! They can do without an MP for a couple months. That'll teach them."
Validity
All
Outcome
MPs insist they are still fit for office as they lay in hospital beds


Title: An Untimely Resignation

Description

Last week, @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@, your Minister for Transport announced @@HIS(1)@@ intention to resign, following a period of ill health. Unfortunately, a previously scheduled national election was coming up in a few months, clouding the announcement with trepidation from the @@DEMONYM@@ public, who aren't keen for by-election mere months before another vote.
Validity
Democracy, possibly Term Limits

Option 1
"Look, I know it sounds bad, but you could just institute an 'Interim Minister', someone to act in @@HIS(1)@@ stead, just until the election," posits @@RANDOMNAME(2)@@, a long-time supporter of your party. "It wouldn't be long, just a few months, and it would save the hassle and cost of another election. Sure, some might not be happy with your decision, but that doesn't matter. I know just the candidate..."
Validity
All
Outcome
ministers are forced into retirement so @@LEADER@@ can pick and choose members of parliament

Option 2
"Whoa, hey. No need to get all autocratic there," interjects @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, the Leader of the Opposition. "Just have the by-election, same as we would in any other case. Strange @@MEN(1)@@, lying on hospital beds distributing resignation letters is no basis for a system of government! Noone knows who's the next candidate the people might want, so let's just have the by-election and find out."
Validity
All
Outcome
a recent flu outbreak in @@CAPITAL@@ has seen by-elections across the country

Option 3
"Ahem. Actually, I know exactly who's the next candidate the people want," states @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, an independent member who only narrowly lost to @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@ in the last election. "Me! I was the candidate with the next most votes, so in the event of @@HIS(1)@@ untimely resignation, I should be given the role."
Validity
All
Outcome
candidates who lose elections watch their opponent's health intently
Last edited by SherpDaWerp on Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:50 am, edited 9 times in total.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8203
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:51 am

How bad would it be to just not have a Minister of Transport for a few months? Governments already seem highly competent at doing nothing, anyway. Or according to Wikipedia, maybe that's just the US government...

User avatar
Tarchuna and Ravenna
Envoy
 
Posts: 314
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tarchuna and Ravenna » Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:55 am

SherpDaWerp wrote:Surprised we don't have any issues around ministers resigning! I searched the spoiler thread for resign - all that came up was people saying "This person should resign!".

Title: An Untimely Resignation

Description

Last week, @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@, your Minister for Transport announced @@HIS(1)@@ intention to resign, following a period of ill health. Unfortunately, a previously scheduled national election was coming up in a few months, clouding the announcement with trepidation from the @@DEMONYM@@ public, who aren't keen for by-election mere months before another vote.
Validity
Democracy, possibly Term Limits

Option 1
"Look, I know it sounds bad, but you could just institute an 'Interim Minister', someone to act in @@HIS(1)@@ stead, just until the election," posits @@RANDOMNAME(2)@@, a long-time supporter of your party. "It wouldn't be long, just a few months, and it would save the hassle and cost of another election. Sure, some might not be happy with your decision, but that doesn't matter. I know just the candidate..."
Validity
All
Outcome
ministers are forced into retirement so @@LEADER@@ can pick and choose members of parliament

Option 2
"Whoa, hey. No need to get all autocratic there," interjects @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, the Leader of the Opposition. "Just have the by-election, same as we would in any other case. Strange @@MEN(1)@@, lying on hospital beds distributing resignation letters is no basis for a system of government! Noone knows who's the next candidate the people might want, so let's just have the by-election and find out."
Validity
All
Outcome
a recent flu outbreak in @@CAPITAL@@ has seen by-elections across the country

Option 3
"Ahem. Actually, I know exactly who's the next candidate the people want," states @@RANDOMNAME(3)@@, an independent member who only narrowly lost to @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@ in the last election. "Me! I was the candidate with the next most votes, so in the event of @@HIS(1)@@ untimely resignation, I should be given the role."
Validity
All
Outcome
candidates who lose elections watch their opponent's health intently


The first one should not lead to that outcome, and there should be another that does. However, this has potential.

(By the way, would you care to check out my issue, Draft 2 “We, the Mighty, do our Duty?”)
We are a powerful Etruscan empire, well, at least a highly Etruscanized remnant of Rome. We control Italia, Corsica, Crete, Cyprus, Syria, Iudaea, and Egypt. Anyone who says otherwise will be butchered with the Social Justice Warriors in the Solar Square.
Our Emperor’s title full title is, His Most August Imperial Eminence, Archduke and Prince of the Etruscans, Emperor of the Romans, also of Crete, Cyprus, Phoenicia, Egypt, and Iudaea, Restorer of the Orient, General of the People, Defender of Rome, Macsimiliane Aemilie Valens Germanicus, the first of his name.
Mocking the government or a military officer is considered sedition and will get you crucified.
Here is everything you need to know about our nation:
https://www.nationstates.net/nation=tar ... l=factbook

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18272
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Australian rePublic » Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:12 pm

This is why democracies have deputies...
Disclaimer: In-Character posts are NOT a reflection of the real world Australian government, any government departments, or any Australian states or territories. I have no authority over real world government decisions. This nation does not reflect my views, as I am trying to unlock banners
As a centrist, I have been called both an extreme leftist and an extreme right-winger.
From Sydney, NSW. From Greek ancestry. Orthodox Christian.
Why stylised as "rePublic"
16 Published Issues and 1 WA Resolution
Issue Ideas You Can Steal

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:41 pm

Trotterdam wrote:How bad would it be to just not have a Minister of Transport for a few months? Governments already seem highly competent at doing nothing, anyway. Or according to Wikipedia, maybe that's just the US government...

This could do as a bit of a "crazy option"... I'll consider making an option 4.

Australian rePublic wrote:This is why democracies have deputies...

The idea of this is buried somewhere in Option 1. But you've forced me to think about the base premise and I've realised that as a "Minister" it doesn't really mean anything - you can just appoint another one of the elected MPs as a minster. The question should be more about how to replace the elected member, not about how to replace the minister. I'll try to add an option 4 as well as emphasising the "member" part in the next draft.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8203
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:34 pm

SherpDaWerp wrote:But you've forced me to think about the base premise and I've realised that as a "Minister" it doesn't really mean anything - you can just appoint another one of the elected MPs as a minster. The question should be more about how to replace the elected member, not about how to replace the minister. I'll try to add an option 4 as well as emphasising the "member" part in the next draft.
To be fair, the voting public may have supported a particular politician as a member of parliament in general without believing that politician to be specifically qualified to deal with matters of transport in particular.

Then again, as far as I know, ministerial positions aren't usually directly elected in most democracies to begin with. At least, I haven't seen them on the ballots where I live.

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:51 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
SherpDaWerp wrote:But you've forced me to think about the base premise and I've realised that as a "Minister" it doesn't really mean anything - you can just appoint another one of the elected MPs as a minster. The question should be more about how to replace the elected member, not about how to replace the minister. I'll try to add an option 4 as well as emphasising the "member" part in the next draft.
To be fair, the voting public may have supported a particular politician as a member of parliament in general without believing that politician to be specifically qualified to deal with matters of transport in particular.

Then again, as far as I know, ministerial positions aren't usually directly elected in most democracies to begin with. At least, I haven't seen them on the ballots where I live.

Well, yeah. In the Australian system, and I suspect in most other democratic countries, what would happen is the PM would just choose another elected MP to be the "Minister for Transport", making my original premise a bit wonky. It's now a lot more about how to replace the elected MP in their status as elected MP, because someone else can always be the transport minister.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8203
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:14 pm

SherpDaWerp wrote:It's now a lot more about how to replace the elected MP in their status as elected MP,
This just makes "just don't" even more of an obvious answer. There are several hundred people in Parliament, one more or less isn't going to make a huge difference.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18272
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Australian rePublic » Sun Jan 26, 2020 12:01 am

Usually the MP would be forced to just wait till the election to resign, whether they want to or not. It'd be better if he/she was unable to serve due to death, incarceration, dimentia, etc.
Option 1- what if the person you desire to appoint is from the opposition party?
Option 4- The consequences of having no MP go far, far, far beyond just people lying in hospital beds. Think of the poor sods who get no representation because their MP happens to be the speaker of the house. Maybe look into that. Also, lying in hospital doesn't make necasserily make you unable to serve. A person recovering from knee surgery, for example, is still able to pull out their laptop and work
Last edited by Australian rePublic on Sun Jan 26, 2020 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Disclaimer: In-Character posts are NOT a reflection of the real world Australian government, any government departments, or any Australian states or territories. I have no authority over real world government decisions. This nation does not reflect my views, as I am trying to unlock banners
As a centrist, I have been called both an extreme leftist and an extreme right-winger.
From Sydney, NSW. From Greek ancestry. Orthodox Christian.
Why stylised as "rePublic"
16 Published Issues and 1 WA Resolution
Issue Ideas You Can Steal

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:29 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
SherpDaWerp wrote:It's now a lot more about how to replace the elected MP in their status as elected MP,
This just makes "just don't" even more of an obvious answer. There are several hundred people in Parliament, one more or less isn't going to make a huge difference.

Option 4 is exactly that.

Australian rePublic wrote:Usually the MP would be forced to just wait till the election to resign, whether they want to or not. It'd be better if he/she was unable to serve due to death, incarceration, dimentia, etc.
That's a good point, so the MP is now unfortunately deceased.

Australian rePublic wrote:Option 1- what if the person you desire to appoint is from the opposition party?
Then you appoint them? You are still "picking and choosing members of parliament", and nowhere in the option does it say you have to choose someone from your party.

Australian rePublic wrote:Option 4- The consequences of having no MP go far, far, far beyond just people lying in hospital beds. Think of the poor sods who get no representation because their MP happens to be the speaker of the house. Maybe look into that. Also, lying in hospital doesn't make necasserily make you unable to serve. A person recovering from knee surgery, for example, is still able to pull out their laptop and work
If you want to think of the poor sods who get no representation, don't choose option 4. The MP in question isn't a minister anymore, nor are they a Speaker or anything else important. Just an MP. And as you pointed out above, it's better if they're deceased because then there's absolutely no question of whether they can still do their jobs.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8203
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:43 pm

Having members of parliament represent specific districts would not apply in a nation with proportional representation.

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:49 pm

Trotterdam wrote:Having members of parliament represent specific districts would not apply in a nation with proportional representation.

Yeah ok. I'll replace the possible Term Limits validity check with a Proportional Representation one.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18272
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Australian rePublic » Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:51 am

If the guy was terminally ill, they would have time to find a planned replacement. You should have him die a sudden death

Trotterdam wrote:Having members of parliament represent specific districts would not apply in a nation with proportional representation.

It actually does. Look at the UK, Australia, etc.
Disclaimer: In-Character posts are NOT a reflection of the real world Australian government, any government departments, or any Australian states or territories. I have no authority over real world government decisions. This nation does not reflect my views, as I am trying to unlock banners
As a centrist, I have been called both an extreme leftist and an extreme right-winger.
From Sydney, NSW. From Greek ancestry. Orthodox Christian.
Why stylised as "rePublic"
16 Published Issues and 1 WA Resolution
Issue Ideas You Can Steal

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 20714
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Corporate Bordello

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:06 am

The UK doesn't have PR.

I don't know too much about Australia, but I understand that casual vacancies are filled by nomination or recount and redistribution, as the concept of a local by-election is meaningless in whole-country PR.

Regardless, this should be an issue for nations WITHOUT proportional representation.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8203
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Feb 05, 2020 7:25 am

Australia uses "single transferable vote", which is a compromise between proportional representation and district representation: each district has several seats, instead of just one, and those seats are allocated proportionally, but because of the relatively small number of seats per district, rounding errors over the districts accumulate to mean the overall parliament won't be as accurately proportional as under a more pure district-blind proportional representation system. Furthermore, Australia uses this system only for the upper house (Senate), and not for the lower house (House of Representatives), which still uses single-seat electoral districts which are not proportional at all.

Single transferable vote is a pretty rare system in real life. Wikipedia lists only 9 nations that use it, and some of those only use it in some provincial elections rather than nationally. Currently no NationStates issues specifically institute a policy of using single transferable vote, and there is probably no call to add one.

User avatar
Visorax
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Nov 02, 2018
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Visorax » Wed Feb 05, 2020 7:32 am

I don't care about the issue, but the first option's result has to be published.
DARKNESS SHALL RISE!

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Wed Feb 05, 2020 7:09 pm

Trotterdam wrote:Having members of parliament represent specific districts would not apply in a nation with proportional representation.

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Regardless, this should be an issue for nations WITHOUT proportional representation.

Sorry, brain fart. I should have put No Proportional Representation. Fixed!

Australian rePublic wrote:If the guy was terminally ill, they would have time to find a planned replacement. You should have him die a sudden death

Ok. It's now a construction accident - @@HE@@ was inspecting a new hospital.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:32 pm

Alright, bumping this (and re-doing Option 1's effect line) while I re-write the re-write of my other draft...

Any more feedback here? I feel like this is a good issue so far.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18272
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Australian rePublic » Thu Feb 20, 2020 5:13 pm

Dying whilst building a hospital. Ha. That's how my grandfather died. This was a significant triggerer of my dad's depression
Disclaimer: In-Character posts are NOT a reflection of the real world Australian government, any government departments, or any Australian states or territories. I have no authority over real world government decisions. This nation does not reflect my views, as I am trying to unlock banners
As a centrist, I have been called both an extreme leftist and an extreme right-winger.
From Sydney, NSW. From Greek ancestry. Orthodox Christian.
Why stylised as "rePublic"
16 Published Issues and 1 WA Resolution
Issue Ideas You Can Steal

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Thu Feb 20, 2020 5:52 pm

Australian rePublic wrote:Dying whilst building a hospital. Ha. That's how my grandfather died. This was a significant triggerer of my dad's depression

Sorry to hear that? I tried to make it deliberately ironic that it was a hospital inspection, rather than a school or a library.
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18272
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Australian rePublic » Thu Feb 20, 2020 6:11 pm

SherpDaWerp wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Dying whilst building a hospital. Ha. That's how my grandfather died. This was a significant triggerer of my dad's depression

Sorry to hear that? I tried to make it deliberately ironic that it was a hospital inspection, rather than a school or a library.

Meh, it's fine.
Disclaimer: In-Character posts are NOT a reflection of the real world Australian government, any government departments, or any Australian states or territories. I have no authority over real world government decisions. This nation does not reflect my views, as I am trying to unlock banners
As a centrist, I have been called both an extreme leftist and an extreme right-winger.
From Sydney, NSW. From Greek ancestry. Orthodox Christian.
Why stylised as "rePublic"
16 Published Issues and 1 WA Resolution
Issue Ideas You Can Steal

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 19152
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Fri Feb 21, 2020 4:29 am

SherpDaWerp wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Dying whilst building a hospital. Ha. That's how my grandfather died. This was a significant triggerer of my dad's depression

Sorry to hear that? I tried to make it deliberately ironic that it was a hospital inspection, rather than a school or a library.

Irony? In the UK, one prominent politician during the early 19th century died due to being run over by a train while attending the inaugural run of its railway...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opening_o ... er_Railway
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152.

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Anarchy

Postby SherpDaWerp » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:50 am

Bears Armed wrote:
SherpDaWerp wrote:Sorry to hear that? I tried to make it deliberately ironic that it was a hospital inspection, rather than a school or a library.

Irony? In the UK, one prominent politician during the early 19th century died due to being run over by a train while attending the inaugural run of its railway...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opening_o ... er_Railway

I swear I've seen that fact before... Maybe in some "horrible histories" type kids book?

Also, the title has been changed to An Untimely Termination, which has a triple-meaning:
  • Termination as in dismissed from office
  • Termination as in deceased
  • Termination + timely = terminator reference, kinda
OOC: High school student who should almost definitely be doing assignments instead
  • I once wrote a 924-word analysis of how memes-as-political-commentary have a detrimental impact on many social issues. I got a 90% grade on my first draft.
  • My hobbies/interests include programming, parkour, hiking, camping, gaming, tabletop RPGs, and playing NationStates, of course
  • I seem to spend quite a bit of time explaining the effects of issue options. Good reading comprehension and a basic understanding of NS stats can work wonders, even without a backstage pass...


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads