Hurtful Thoughts wrote:Vassenor wrote:
TIL it's ridiculous to present the findings of an investigation.
When half the findings consist of "I read the New York Times and Wikipedia, tehrefore I'm a valid witness for the prosocution in a case for federal crimes that are still punishable by public execution [High crimes and treason]. I'm also the judge, jury, and witness." I'd point out such is kinda ridiculous and a pretty hienus legal precedent to start setting in 2020.
Because what's acceptable here and now, is going to eventually trickle down as acceptable court behavior in the lower courts.
When it comes to rebuttle, I'm half predicting "And I've watched FOX News, and I'm also an equally valid witness, judge, and juror in this case. We also outnumber you." followed by "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" from someone in the back.
would like moderation trolling and maybe warning about the behavior