Does AU's nation represent their views?

[Silver Commonwealth]

A small idea for a forum game I had in mind today - judging from the AN's factbooks. and/or NS stats, and policies, does it represent the users OOC views or not? If it does, by how much? Does it fully represent them, mostly, partly, or is somewhat of an exaggeration of them? Please don't cheat by looking at AN's OOC factbooks, if they have an one.

Example:

Nation A: I think, that the nation is mostly accurate about user's views, but not for all 100%, as they treat it more as a writing project than anything else.

Nation B: No way it represents their views - it is such a terrible place to live in, that no sane person should support it!

No nation above me, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Eisenstern]

Very obviously no.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

100%.

[Skyhooked]

Only partially. In RL user above is rather moderate in terms of conservatism.

[Silver Commonwealth]

Does AN represent their user's views? For the most part, yes - especially when it comes to social issues, generally being in support of looser gun laws, weed, and so on. One could mistake them for an American libertarian/ancap, but I know, that they aren't an one. Also, some parts of Skyhooked might also be exaggerated.

[The Rapture Republic]

No. Perhaps in some aspects, like the rebel faction, but overall no.

[Vulgaro-Graznavian Commonwealth]

Nope.

[Khoronzon]

Not the Commonwealth, though Major Windigo and the UDU are perhaps a more radical embodiment of what they believe, and they may share a few minor details here and there with some ideologies in the Commonwealth.

Ninja'd:
AAN: At least partially yes, maybe again as a more extreme representation of what they actually believe.
AN: Probably not. Maybe in a few aspects.

[Vulgaro-Graznavian Commonwealth]

Not the Commonwealth, though Major Windigo and the UDU are perhaps a more radical embodiment of what they believe, and they may share a few minor details here and there with some ideologies in the Commonwealth.

N.I.N.J.A.'.D


/skip

[Skyhooked]

Of course not! Or... what if... Please, tell me, that Khoronzon doens't. Please?

[Nouveau Quebecois]

Yes, 2000%. They believe everything they write. To the dime. Every single line.

[The Rapture Republic]

Yes, 2000%. They believe everything they write. To the dime. Every single line.

Yes, but only with the Francophile and pipe dream of an independent Quebec but everything else is outside of what they believe.

[Voxija]

Heck nein.

[Silver Commonwealth]

Does AN represent their user's views? Most likely, as at first glance it doesn't seem to be one of those psychotic dictatorships, or political strawman countries.

[Novaja Vietj Dielienaja]

Probably no, because I have seen his other nations.

[Khoronzon]

Despite what their sig says (and actually in part because of what their sig says), I'd say it doesn't. Then again, there's very little information on what the nation's ideology actually is.

[Silver Commonwealth]

Does AN represent their user's views? For the most part no, although some of them might be taken to the extreme in this nation, and some cultural things might be something, which user finds interesting IRL. (Not really views, I know, but still...)

[Boring People]

No, and not even close.

[-Astoria]

Kind of.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

No, not at all, not even close. I guess that the AU in fact despises most of what they write and is wholly convinced his creation is fiction and not representative of any inch of their views whatsoever.

[Sapporo Hyperspace Riftgate Laboratory]

Slightly, about 50%.

[-Astoria]

Nah.

[Silver Commonwealth]

Does AN represent their user's views? Definitely. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised, if their leader, along with the some of nation's policies, would be self-inserts.

[The Terran Communities]

I'd say no. Highly unlikely someone would want to be ruled by a Supercomputer named Tom.

[Silver Commonwealth]

I'd say no. Highly unlikely someone would want to be ruled by a Supercomputer named Tom.

Well, the NSG is a pretty wild place, so...
/skip