Kaltovar wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:But you don't get it, it's part of their entire way of life now, they need to find something to get offended about and someone to catch being a wrongthink so they can get their daily dose of burning someone at the virtual stake!
How will they be an online ACTIVIST if they don't have any made up things to feel like they need to crusade against.
After all it's the only thing that gives their pathetic lives value.
I was like that as a teenager. I distinctly remember looking for things to get offended over, thinking that by doing it I could improve the world. Now I have a red flag with an iron cross and ancap colors on it to piss off every conceivable direction of the political compass.
Just give them some time and do what you can to make their ridiculous behavior uncool, and a lot of them will grow out of it. That worldview is honestly very unpopular with the youngest generation, who is coming to see it much the same way the kids of the 60s saw their authoritarian parents. There's a lot of parallels between the moral panic we're seeing now surrounding Political Correctness and cancel culture and the Inquisition against commies, gays, and non Christians we saw in the 70s.
"If you are not me, you are my enemy"
"It's okay to destroy the careers of people who hold different views than you"
"Anyone outside the tribe is not worthy of your friendship"
"There are giant conspiracies by the other side that permeate and control every aspect of our society"
I'm sure some wokester will point out how totally wrong and not okay those parallels I'm drawing are, because people in the 50s are the bad guys and they're the good guys.
I wish it was the 1950s they were hating on. They're hating on people alive today for saying things that for the most part are true. For example, the uncomfortable fact that the ancient Egyptians would not be considered to be black people in America today. the ancient Egyptians were physically alike in appearance with middle eastern people and southern Europeans and were genetically closest to the middle east. Their modern descendants today are the copts who are almost entirely of North African origin and they're considered to be Caucasian on the census. Most other indigenous North Africans also are considered caucasian. Don't say this in front of an Afrocentrist though, or some pseudo African named Kunte Kinte Matuba (real name Mark Johnson, but he changed his name to sound more african) who doesn't know the difference between the Zulu and the Ashanti, and who has never been to Africa in his life, will flip out and call you a white supremacist and say you're culturally appropriating from his people. Talk about gas lighting