(Draft)Police Funding Act

[Kollafjordur]

This is my new proposal,please tell me what you think of it.If I don't reply back,it does not mean I am not listening to your suggestions.

Creation of an International Police Funding Office
Section I:“Creation of an International Police Funding Office”,
Section II: Regarding the Creation of an International Police Funding Office,
Subsection I: Many officers lack the funding needed to keep criminals at bay,which in turn affects the safety of the nation.This may affect tourism or the happiness of the citizens,as their belief in the nations law keeping system has fallen.
Section III: Regarding the Amount of money required from each nation to fund the Police
Subsection I: Each country shall pay 50,000 per year(Currency Varies) ,no exceptions.Total money should equal 1,078,100,000 in money(currently).
Section IV:The PFO office
Subsection I: The PFO office shall oversee that the funds are distributed equally,and will forever hold the right to change the amount of money required from the nations.The secretary would also hold this same right.

-If executed properly,the amount of crime in the GA nations will deteriorate.

Don't be that harsh.

[Kenmoria]

(OOC: GA #002, Rights and Duties of WA States bans a WA police force.)

[American Pere Housh]

(OOC: GA #002, Rights and Duties of WA States bans a WA police force.)

This proposal has nothing to do with establishing a WA police force, only funding police forces in various WA nation.

[Kenmoria]

(OOC: GA #002, Rights and Duties of WA States bans a WA police force.)

This proposal has nothing to do with establishing a WA police force, only funding police forces in various WA nation.

(OOC: I view having an international funding office as ‘otherwise participating’ in police actions, since the money would be distributed by a WA committee to police forces.)

the WA will not engage in commanding, organising, ratifying, denouncing, or otherwise participating in armed conflicts, police actions, or military activities

[Grays Harbor]

OOC: In my opinion, Kenmoria has the right of this, extant legislation would prohibit this as it would be a de facto creation of an international police through the funding committee

[Desmosthenes and Burke]

OOC: In my opinion, Kenmoria has the right of this, extant legislation would prohibit this as it would be a de facto creation of an international police through the funding committee

I think it would be worth it at some point to formally force GenSec, in a ruling, to state it is giving such a reading to police action. Especially since the standard meaning of "police action" in political science absolutely does not accord.

See, for example:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/police%20action
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/police-action
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/police-action
https://www.britannica.com/topic/police-action

and the list goes on.

[Bears Armed]

OOC: In my opinion, Kenmoria has the right of this, extant legislation would prohibit this as it would be a de facto creation of an international police through the funding committee

I think it would be worth it at some point to formally force GenSec, in a ruling, to state it is giving such a reading to police action. Especially since the standard meaning of "police action" in political science absolutely does not accord.

See, for example:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/police%20action
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/police-action
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/police-action
https://www.britannica.com/topic/police-action

and the list goes on.

OOC
On this post’s rulings we have one GenSec member agreeing with you, and three disagreeing, with the other two not actually addressing that aspect of the proposal in question. I can remember (although unfortunately, cannot find at present despite searching for nearly half an hour...) a related discussion in which the vote was 1:5.

[Kollafjordur]

Ok,so do you want me to throw away this idea,or just edit out those parts

[The New California Republic]

Ok,so do you want me to throw away this idea,or just edit out those parts

Is there even an idea left if those parts are edited out?

[Kollafjordur]

Ok,so do you want me to throw away this idea,or just edit out those parts

Is there even an idea left if those parts are edited out?

Good Point.What do you guys suggest I do with this proposal.While I don't feel like throwing this away,I will if something like this is deemed illegal.

[Kenmoria]

Is there even an idea left if those parts are edited out?

Good Point.What do you guys suggest I do with this proposal.While I don't feel like throwing this away,I will if something like this is deemed illegal.

(OOC: I think this proposal is, unfortunately, not one that should be continued. The contradiction issue is one that can’t be fixed without completely changing the legislation, and it would be easier to pursue a different idea.)

[Kollafjordur]

Good Point.What do you guys suggest I do with this proposal.While I don't feel like throwing this away,I will if something like this is deemed illegal.

(OOC: I think this proposal is, unfortunately, not one that should be continued. The contradiction issue is one that can’t be fixed without completely changing the legislation, and it would be easier to pursue a different idea.)

Alright.Thanks for the feedback

[Terttia]

(OOC: I think this proposal is, unfortunately, not one that should be continued. The contradiction issue is one that can’t be fixed without completely changing the legislation, and it would be easier to pursue a different idea.)

Alright.Thanks for the feedback

I highly suggest reading everything regarding rules and advice of writing a GA proposal/resolution (usually at the top of the GA forum) before you start writing. Also remember, as the saying goes around here (or something like this), “Writing a resolution is a marathon, not a sprint.”