Resolution Requirement

[Insaanistan]

1. A resolution must need a majority of votes to pass.
2. All nations are strongly encouraged to vote on a resolution.
3. Complaints made by abstention holders will not be tolerated

[Kenmoria]

(OOC: Welcome to the General Assembly. If this is intended to be a proposal, then I recommend having a look at some examples to see what one should normally look like. This is illegal for submission due to violation of the rules, as the subject matter is not one appropriate for a piece of legislation.)

[Araraukar]

1. A resolution must need a majority of votes to pass.
2. All nations are strongly encouraged to vote on a resolution.
3. Complaints made by abstention holders will not be tolerated

OOC: In addition to what Kenmoria said, the third bit sounds really off, given that there's no way to vote "abstain" and so the only way to make your abstention known is to post it on the forum thread.

[Terttia]

1. A resolution must need a majority of votes to pass.
2. All nations are strongly encouraged to vote on a resolution.
3. Complaints made by abstention holders will not be tolerated

OOC: In addition to what Kenmoria said, the third bit sounds really off, given that there's no way to vote "abstain" and so the only way to make your abstention known is to post it on the forum thread.

Agreed.

[Grays Harbor]

1. A resolution must need a majority of votes to pass.
2. All nations are strongly encouraged to vote on a resolution.
3. Complaints made by abstention holders will not be tolerated

Clause #1) Illegal for game mechanics, as written. Also, that’s how resolutions are passed anyhow, so, what’s the point of this clause?
Clause #2) Does nothing
Clause #3) unenforceable, borderline metagaming and censorship.

Not to mention, there is no category I am aware of this could be shoehorned into.

[Liberimery]

1. A resolution must need a majority of votes to pass.
2. All nations are strongly encouraged to vote on a resolution.
3. Complaints made by abstention holders will not be tolerated

Clause #1) Illegal for game mechanics, as written. Also, that’s how resolutions are passed anyhow, so, what’s the point of this clause?
Clause #2) Does nothing
Clause #3) unenforceable, borderline metagaming and censorship.

Not to mention, there is no category I am aware of this could be shoehorned into.

I’d argue that clause 3 is de facto enforced if not de jure, given that “lemmings” are often blamed as the primary cause for a proposal’s failure instead of, you know, legitimate concerns about the proposal’s mandates on nations.