NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] The Right of Independence For Colonial Lands

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Yemet
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: May 31, 2018
Democratic Socialists

[DRAFT] The Right of Independence For Colonial Lands

Postby Yemet » Wed Oct 23, 2019 5:53 am

I have alreay received some feedback from the GA Secretariat after I proposed it but forgot to send it here for some one elses view.


The Right of Independence For Colonial Lands

Category: Democratic Freedoms | Strength: Strong


Knowing that this Assembly’s goal is to promote and make an increase in both political and civil freedoms. This bill gives a nations territory or colony the ability to legally vow for independence.

Understanding, that many indigenous groups have lost land to another nation and wish to become independent and that this Assembly should push to support these events, in the progression of civil rights and democratic values.

Defines, a colony as a country or area that is partially or fully controlled by a foreign power and has settlers from said power.

Hereby,

1. Establishes the World Assembly Council of Colonial Independence

2. Instructs, the Council:

  • a. Survey a list of current colonial possessions of member nations at the end of each year.
  • b. Document wether these posessions are legally owned without a supression of the native population.
  • c. Alert the General Assembly of any violations of Humans and Civil rights along with political freedoms in these colonial possessions.

2. Commands, World Assembly member nations to allow a legal referendum of independence for a colonial possession at least once every 5 Years if it is deemed legal.

3. Requires, all member nations to comply with World Assembly, Human and Civil rights acts in their colonial possessions.

4. Orders, all members to install a regional government or council in their colonies to allow the native population to have control of local issues and laws.

5. Recommends, member nations to install a full autonomous system in their colonies to allow for an easier transition into independence if an area voted in favour of independence.
Last edited by Yemet on Wed Oct 23, 2019 5:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:14 am

Welcome!

I see that you've taken my advice seriously.
One minor glitch, here: The category's name is 'The Furtherment of Democracy'' rather than 'Democratic Freedoms'.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Oct 23, 2019 8:16 am

Mobile. Deemed legal by whom?

Lose the holding and italicising. Sentence fragments lacking subjects are not sentences. Separate with semicolons rather than full stops. Put "The General Assembly" to the top, as the whole resolution lacks an enacting subject. Within lists, the word 'and' occurs at the end of the penultimate item.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Wed Oct 23, 2019 8:24 am, edited 2 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7914
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Wed Oct 23, 2019 9:23 am

“You have two clause 2s. In the second one, you don’t actually require that this referendum be followed. All a state needs to do to comply is hold a public vote; they don’t need to actually listen to what results.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Liberimery
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 402
Founded: May 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberimery » Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:00 pm

Definition of colony or territory? Does it apply to Nations with Federal Distribution of power? Also mandatory referendums seem rather arbitrary. What if the nation doesn’t allow voting rights to other regions of that nation, like dictator ships or absolute monarchies. It also ignores that independent movements are inherently internal affairs and assumes that the region seeking separation is motivated by morally pure objectives. History teaches that it is rarely the case.

(( Consider the political situation of the US civil war where the breakaway state did so to protect the institutionalized chattel Slavery of minority members of the population. I’m having a difficult time finding a plausible read of this proposal that supports the side of the Inited States against the Confederacy. And that’s not even touching on independent movements that were little than Same Shit! Under new management!))


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads