NATION

PASSWORD

(DRAFT) Protecting Coral Reefs

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Forensatha
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Aug 22, 2018
New York Times Democracy

(DRAFT) Protecting Coral Reefs

Postby Forensatha » Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:12 am

The World Assembly,

Recognizing that coral reefs are an important environmental asset that provides biodiversity in the world’s oceans;

Concerned that maritime industry is destroying coral reefs, and thereby annihilating the aquatic environment;

Restricting the scope of "maritime industry" as concerns this resolution to commercial fishing and shipping only;

Determined to provide immediate protection to coral reefs;

The World Assembly adopts the following resolution:

1. A committee will be created to determine twenty (20) no-sail zones around major coral reefs.

a. A major coral reef is defined for the purpose of this act as a coral reef with an area greater than 5 square miles.

b. The committee will consist of environmental experts from around the world. A convention will be held to determine the no-sail zones and representatives from fishing and shipping companies are welcome to come and voice their opinions on locations for the no-sail zones.

i. The committee will work closely with the fishing and shipping industries to make sure that those industries are affected minimally throughout the course of these changes.

c. Military vessels and recreational activities are not affected by this act.

i. Military vessels are defined as vessels in a nation’s navy. Private military company ships are not included as military vessels.

ii. Recreational activities are defined as any form of SCUBA, snorkeling, small-scale fishing, and simple pleasure boating.

2. Vessels which trespass in a no-sail zone will be escorted to the nearest WA member nation. Their crews will be held there until an international court is assembled to put them to trial.

a. The defendant will face the charge of trespassing on an international reserve.

i. The captain and/or crew of the trespassing vessel may serve jail time for resisting arrest if they do not comply with the escorting naval authorities.

c. The trespassing vessel will be returned to the defendant after the trial, whether or not they are found guilty.

d. Fines may increase to dissuade vessels from trespassing into the No-Sail Zones.

3. Recreational vessels may not engage in any of the following within no-sail zones:

a. Use of fishing nets,

b. “Chumming” the water,

c. Spearfishing,

d. Use of explosives or firearms, and

e. Removal of coral.

4. SCUBA divers and snorkelers must comply with all applicable regulations.

5. All trash must be stowed aboard vessel and disposed of on land.
Last edited by Forensatha on Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
Also known as Sargon Reman
GA#22

User avatar
Concrete Slab
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 45
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
New York Times Democracy

Postby Concrete Slab » Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:15 am

What's the point of the proposal if, according to 1c, military and recreational activities won't be affected? Seems kind of contradictory to the rest of the proposal.

And I don't think people will like their citizens being held under foreign rule and punishment.
Last edited by Concrete Slab on Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Concrete Slab
Author of GAR#471 and SCR#271
Proud member of The South Pacific

User avatar
Ransium
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6290
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Ransium » Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:15 am

I think you miss the scale of the WA. What is 20 versus the number of WA nations? There are twenty major coral reefs around Ransium. And what of non-WA nations? Either they’re unregulated, making this resolution useless, or they are regulate by this resolution, making this resolution illegal.
Last edited by Ransium on Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest since March 20th, 2007.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017.
Author of 22 issues. First editor of 44.
Forum Moderator since November 10th, 2017. Game Moderator since March 15th, 2018.

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 18760
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Bears Armed » Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:22 am

OOC
Be careful not to contradict GA Resolution #199 'Sustainable Fishing Act'.
Also, the rules are fussy about setting the membership of committees.
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152.

User avatar
Kenmoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5345
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:33 am

“Most of clause 2 isn’t appropriate for the World Assembly. It would be far better to require that member nations penalise trespassing on coral reefs within their territory. Also, in clause 1a, coral reefs are 3D objects so have volume, not area. I recommend saying that they must cover an area greater than 5 square miles, not consist of that area.”
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Kenmoria is Laissez-Faire on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following nearly all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
Forensatha
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Aug 22, 2018
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forensatha » Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:53 am

Thank you all for your input. I will review the matter.
Also known as Sargon Reman
GA#22


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kaschovia, Sierra Lyricalia

Advertisement

Remove ads