by Tuarus don » Mon Sep 16, 2019 2:44 pm
by WayNeacTia » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:28 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Eumaeus » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:38 pm
Tuarus don wrote:The Security Council
Lauding The Anti World Assembly's constant advancement in new programs, notably the unendorsement program and regional polls, that set it independent from other regions.
Recognizing the region's democratic structure and the equality it uses to pass regional legalization allowing for all nations to contribute.
Specifically recognizing how it respects nations ignoring population statistics and World Assembly endorsements and how it protects nations and allows all nations access to features recognizable as hard to obtain in other regions.
Applauding the monitored communication between nations and the lack of trust being betrayed significantly.
[b[Also applauding[/b] the efforts taken to restore the World Assembly to greater glory by contacting passive nations to offer them humanitarian aid in times of need.
Complementing the idea to split debate into a diverse range of topics when communicating.
Noting The Anti World Assembly ejects its members to allow them to geologically travel to other regions to aid them in spite of itself.
Admiring the large group of nations the Anti World Assembly has aided, notably Kyle-Ville and other regions of generally smaller size to the Anti World assembly.
Impressed by The Anti World Assembly's plan to found the Nationstates Raiders Union. Also the efforts taken to ensure that all raided Nations are respected as they are raided. Also the fact that the Anti World Assembly spends long hours contacting its nations to inform them of even small events of happenings.
Acknowledging that even though the Anti World Assembly is recent it has obtained new members swiftly and its presence in the World Assembly is ever increasing.
Believing The Anti World Assembly is a model to all nations that oppose the World Assembly but still seek refuge from violence;
Hereby commends The Anti World Assembly
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Lord Dominator » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:26 pm
Tuarus don wrote:Also the efforts taken to ensure that all raided Nations are respected as they are raided.
by The Pharcyde » Tue Sep 17, 2019 5:43 am
by Kaboomlandia » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:01 pm
by The New California Republic » Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:32 pm
by Annihilators of Chan Island » Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:39 pm
by Big Octopus » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:46 am
Hmm. Everyone tries to commend himself. But did anyone condemn himself?Annihilators of Chan Island wrote:An attempted self-commend?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Deg7VrpHbM
by Lord Dominator » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:49 am
Big octopus wrote:Hmm. Everyone tries to commend himself. But did anyone condemn himself?Annihilators of Chan Island wrote:An attempted self-commend?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Deg7VrpHbM
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:23 am
by The New California Republic » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:25 am
Marxist Germany wrote:OOC: Do not gravedig old threads for the modly wrath is great.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:47 am
Marxist Germany wrote:OOC: Do not gravedig old threads for the modly wrath is great.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Munkcestrian Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:39 am
by Marxist Germany » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:46 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I have resigned from the World Assembly as a demonstration of my support for this commendation.
by Munkcestrian Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:49 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:23 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I have resigned from the World Assembly as a demonstration of my support for this commendation.
by Munkcestrian Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:25 am
by WayNeacTia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:30 am
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Munkcestrian Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:32 am
Wayneactia wrote:Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I know you disagree with me on a lot of things, but there's no reason to start getting aggressive about everything.
Didn't seem that aggressive to me. What was achieved by you resigning over a proposal that will never make it to vote? Perhaps you need to cool your jets for a while hmm?
by WayNeacTia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:37 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:Wayneactia wrote:
Didn't seem that aggressive to me. What was achieved by you resigning over a proposal that will never make it to vote? Perhaps you need to cool your jets for a while hmm?
Probably because it wasn't aimed at you I believe I made clear what was achieved in my first post in this thread.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:18 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:44 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I believe I made clear what was achieved in my first post in this thread.
by Tuarus don » Sat Nov 02, 2019 11:22 am
Wayneactia wrote:No
by Indo-Malaysia » Mon Nov 04, 2019 3:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement