Advertisement
by The Angel of Charity » Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:18 am
by Marxist Germany » Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:29 am
The Angel of Charity wrote:I have to say I oppose this resolution, because I believe minors should be germ free, whether they like it or not.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:32 am
by Refuge Isle » Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:35 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:45 am
by Kenmoria » Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:10 am
The Angel of Charity wrote:I have to say I oppose this resolution, because I believe minors should be germ free, whether they like it or not.
by Marxist Germany » Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:22 am
Kenmoria wrote:The Angel of Charity wrote:I have to say I oppose this resolution, because I believe minors should be germ free, whether they like it or not.
(OOC: If your government wants to interpret the legislation in that way, then your state must have some very strange priorities. That is technically in compliance, but is in no way good-faith.)
by Kenmoria » Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:25 am
by Marxist Germany » Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:27 am
by The Angel of Charity » Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:45 am
by Pharexia » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:25 pm
by Sodoran Alesia » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:03 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:> Sterilization is distinct from disinfection, sanitization, and pasteurization, in that those methods reduce rather than eliminate all forms of life and biological agents present. After sterilization, an object is referred to as being sterile or aseptic.
I'd imagine a board would take a dim view of killing the patient. However that is,
(Image)
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:59 pm
by Bears Armed » Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:47 am
Sodoran Alesia wrote:Also incompetent person needs to be defined as well. Like what does that mean? I know you probably mean a person who can't make that decision for themselves because of mental illness or something, but still, every time I see it, I keep on thinking of a guy who sucks at his job!
__________________________
Also, how exactly will the WACC ensure the IRBs are independent? And given the lack of a definition for incompetent person, what's to stop a corrupt IRB in a country from using their own definition and sterilizing ethnic groups?
by Kenmoria » Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:30 am
Pharexia wrote:The Pharexian delegation raises concerns with the usage of "etc" in a title, as it creates an inappropriate degree of ambiguity. We also believe that forced sterilisation of a child is prohibited under the pre-existing prevention of child abuse law. We will therefore be voting against this proposal.
by Sodoran Alesia » Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:10 am
Bears Armed wrote:Sodoran Alesia wrote:Also incompetent person needs to be defined as well. Like what does that mean? I know you probably mean a person who can't make that decision for themselves because of mental illness or something, but still, every time I see it, I keep on thinking of a guy who sucks at his job!
__________________________
Also, how exactly will the WACC ensure the IRBs are independent? And given the lack of a definition for incompetent person, what's to stop a corrupt IRB in a country from using their own definition and sterilizing ethnic groups?
GA Resolution #299, 'Legal Competence'.
GA Resolution #38, 'Convention on Genocide', clause 2..
by Kenmoria » Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:14 am
Sodoran Alesia wrote:Bears Armed wrote:
GA Resolution #299, 'Legal Competence'.
GA Resolution #38, 'Convention on Genocide', clause 2..
I'm an idiot, I should have done my research before making such brazen statements. I apologize. Still, there is a lot of potential corruption with these IRBs, this resolution has no teeth to enforce independence or even make sure the IRBs are composed of medical professionals. There is too much ambiguity in this proposal to the point of enabling member nations to sterilize people rather than banning and regulating it on a case by case basis in terms of long term health.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:00 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:About 'etc' and how it's never appeared in any law and how it's use is to unprofessional and how it's shocking for people to use Latin abbreviations when Germanic ones will do, see http://legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/38/contents.
In fact, it's so shocking, http://legislation.gov.uk/ukpga?title=etc, since the start of the digital age, we have published 36 acts with it. Given that the site started in 1988, that's over one a year! The UK Parliament is defamed by such activity!
by Aplan » Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:25 pm
by Plaskagar Tusdeta » Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:01 pm
by Araraukar » Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:13 pm
Ban on Sterilisation of Minors etc was passed 10,312 votes to 3,139.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement