Scherzinger wrote:Liriena wrote:I'm not "trying to imply" anything. You are obstinately trying to put words in my mouth and projecting motivations onto me.
Ngo's work as an "anti-antifa" journalist deserves to be criticized. If you gave a single solitary cuss about nuance, truth and fairness, rather than be so obsessed with virtue signalling and emotional pearl-clutching in a debate thread, you might have noticed that I've been very explicit about my dislike for violence not carried out in self-defense. This isn't me trying to justify the assault on Ngo. This is me rejecting the stupid notion that we cannot discuss the ways in which Ngo has acted like a grifter, propagandist and provocateur, which are relevant to this discussion regardless of what happened to him.
This is akin to saying that we could not criticize Hillary Clinton's work and ideas if she happened to be assaulted by a political opponent.
Empathy is good, but it should not be an unreasonable obstacle to finding the truth.
*looks at profile, sees hes an idiot socialist*
yeah....not gonna take a word of what you say seriously