From: Grand Ambassador Peter Nizhinsky, Speaker-to-Slavers
To: Public Release
Subj: The Ostensible Revolution
I will first of all remind you that Allanea has never claimed a "subservience" to any World Assembly document, nor has it ever subscribed to any clause of any kind of any World Assembly resolution, and it shall continue to never do so. As such we do not agree that the clauses you quoted are "supreme". We have never guaranteed a "subservience" to such a right.
You proceed to then use the term "neoliberal", a word used by pseudo-intellectuals to conflate any and all of their opponents together – classical liberals and theocrats, libertarians and fascists, monarchists and anarcho-capitalists, and so on forever.
But to answer your question: the Free Kingdom stands, now and always, for the rights to life, liberty, and property. You may believe that your revolution is inevitable. We know that historic inevitability is a sham, perpetrated by unwashed Marxists to intimidate their opponents both intellectually and physically into surrendering to the whims of the so-called representatives of the proletariat.
Let us ignore momentarily the many philosophical problems with your statements (you claim capitalism is unconsented – but then a paragraph down the page you mock those laborers that reject your Communist snake-oil). The question, of course, is not even whether capitalism is superior to Maoism. But what is absolutely fascinating that you accuse us of a failure to cooperate.
This is a bizarre response – we have rejected your objective of replacing the government of South Reinkalistan with a Maoist or Communist one, and we have rejected your measures of sanctions because those measures are economically ignorant and would not work even if the objective was improving South Reinkalistan's human rights record rather than worsening it, as is your actual objective.
Conversely, we have proposed several measures that would actually improve the lot of the supposed oppressed proletarians, including opening avenues of diplomacy with South Reinkalistan to improve its policies, as well as welcoming refugees from this country.
The twin questions of all public policy are as opposed to what? and at what costs
Both Allanea and the Pan-Asiatic States clearly have condemned the recent outbursts of violence in South Reinkalistan.
But what you seek to replace the government of South Reinkalistan with is an outburst of revolutionary violence, to be replaced in turn with a dictatorship of the proletariat.
It is not clear why we would consider that to be better (even if elections were held regularly, and the proletarian mass-murder reaffirmed by majority vote) than what exists today. The alternative is clearly far worse, and the cost would be tens of thousands of lives.
To: Public Release
Subj: The Ostensible Revolution
I will first of all remind you that Allanea has never claimed a "subservience" to any World Assembly document, nor has it ever subscribed to any clause of any kind of any World Assembly resolution, and it shall continue to never do so. As such we do not agree that the clauses you quoted are "supreme". We have never guaranteed a "subservience" to such a right.
You proceed to then use the term "neoliberal", a word used by pseudo-intellectuals to conflate any and all of their opponents together – classical liberals and theocrats, libertarians and fascists, monarchists and anarcho-capitalists, and so on forever.
But to answer your question: the Free Kingdom stands, now and always, for the rights to life, liberty, and property. You may believe that your revolution is inevitable. We know that historic inevitability is a sham, perpetrated by unwashed Marxists to intimidate their opponents both intellectually and physically into surrendering to the whims of the so-called representatives of the proletariat.
Let us ignore momentarily the many philosophical problems with your statements (you claim capitalism is unconsented – but then a paragraph down the page you mock those laborers that reject your Communist snake-oil). The question, of course, is not even whether capitalism is superior to Maoism. But what is absolutely fascinating that you accuse us of a failure to cooperate.
This is a bizarre response – we have rejected your objective of replacing the government of South Reinkalistan with a Maoist or Communist one, and we have rejected your measures of sanctions because those measures are economically ignorant and would not work even if the objective was improving South Reinkalistan's human rights record rather than worsening it, as is your actual objective.
Conversely, we have proposed several measures that would actually improve the lot of the supposed oppressed proletarians, including opening avenues of diplomacy with South Reinkalistan to improve its policies, as well as welcoming refugees from this country.
The twin questions of all public policy are as opposed to what? and at what costs
Both Allanea and the Pan-Asiatic States clearly have condemned the recent outbursts of violence in South Reinkalistan.
But what you seek to replace the government of South Reinkalistan with is an outburst of revolutionary violence, to be replaced in turn with a dictatorship of the proletariat.
It is not clear why we would consider that to be better (even if elections were held regularly, and the proletarian mass-murder reaffirmed by majority vote) than what exists today. The alternative is clearly far worse, and the cost would be tens of thousands of lives.
