NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Protecting Personal Data

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:59 am

Maowi wrote:
Morover wrote:“Quite frankly, if this passes as-is, it will need to be repealed and redrafted, in my humble opinion.”


'Agreed, ambassador. Which is why we've voted against this proposal. Much better for it to fail and the author wait a while and submit a much improved version than for it to pass and then the whole effort of a repeal and replace to be gone through. Unfortunately, most World Assembly ambassadors do not debate here. We'll have to wait and see.'

"Agreed ambassador, but I guess someone's going to have to repeal it in this case."
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Blakenham
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 45
Founded: Jul 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Blakenham » Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:07 am

"We welcome and support the fundamental ideas and morals behind this resolution - however, we will be voting against this resolution and encourage other WA members to do the same. We believe the provisions within the resolution are too detailed for the application across all WA member states and restricts member nations from carrying out nationally lawful surveillance activities due to Article 2, subsection 3. The provision in this resolution which allows for governments to view the data of a user which a business holds is limited to "where information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a search warrant has been issued." It does not consider instances where, for instances dealing with terrorism and extremism, data may be needed in the prevention of crime where a criminal investigation or trial has not been opened, during heightened or national emergencies in which a search warrant may prevent law enforcement or government agencies from preventing crime in Goodspeed in which warrants may not be able to be issued quickly - as it does not consider varying legal systems across nation states. "

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:12 am

Blakenham wrote:"We welcome and support the fundamental ideas and morals behind this resolution - however, we will be voting against this resolution and encourage other WA members to do the same. We believe the provisions within the resolution are too detailed for the application across all WA member states and restricts member nations from carrying out nationally lawful surveillance activities due to Article 2, subsection 3. The provision in this resolution which allows for governments to view the data of a user which a business holds is limited to "where information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a search warrant has been issued." It does not consider instances where, for instances dealing with terrorism and extremism, data may be needed in the prevention of crime where a criminal investigation or trial has not been opened, during heightened or national emergencies in which a search warrant may prevent law enforcement or government agencies from preventing crime in Goodspeed in which warrants may not be able to be issued quickly - as it does not consider varying legal systems across nation states. "

"Why should any government spy on it's citizens without their consent or a search warrant?"
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:39 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:"Why should any government spy on it's citizens without their consent or a search warrant?"

"Why would the state need a search warrant to keep tabs on citizens they have reason to believe will cause problems?" asked a young blonde woman dressed in crisp grey suit.
Last edited by Araraukar on Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:59 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"Why should any government spy on it's citizens without their consent or a search warrant?"

"Why would the state need a search warrant to keep tabs on citizens they have reason to believe will cause problems?" asked a young blonde woman dressed in crisp grey suit.

"How about I rephrase it to 'why should the government spy on innocent citizens'"
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Maowi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1241
Founded: Jan 07, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maowi » Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:07 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Araraukar wrote:"Why would the state need a search warrant to keep tabs on citizens they have reason to believe will cause problems?" asked a young blonde woman dressed in crisp grey suit.

"How about I rephrase it to 'why should the government spy on innocent citizens'"


'Well, how do you expect the government to know they're innocent without spying on them?' Cass chuckles to herself. 'In all seriousness though, ambassador, I find that clause a little too crudely done. It would have been better with some clarification and a little more detailed.'
THE SUPINE SOCIALIST SLOTHLAND OF MAOWI

hi!LETHARGY ⭐️ LANGUOR ⭐️ LAZINESShi!

Home | Guide for Visitors | Religion | Fashion

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:10 pm

Maowi wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"How about I rephrase it to 'why should the government spy on innocent citizens'"


'Well, how do you expect the government to know they're innocent without spying on them?' Cass chuckles to herself. 'In all seriousness though, ambassador, I find that clause a little too crudely done. It would have been better with some clarification and a little more detailed.'

"A government can know if ones innocent if they haven't been accused of a crime or if the jury/judge ruled them innocent in a trial. I can't see how the clause could be improved Ms Ambassador."
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Maowi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1241
Founded: Jan 07, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maowi » Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:19 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Maowi wrote:'Well, how do you expect the government to know they're innocent without spying on them?' Cass chuckles to herself. 'In all seriousness though, ambassador, I find that clause a little too crudely done. It would have been better with some clarification and a little more detailed.'

"A government can know if ones innocent if they haven't been accused of a crime or if the jury/judge ruled them innocent in a trial. I can't see how the clause could be improved Ms Ambassador."


'What of nations which contract private companies for, say, their traffic control cameras? A driver can be said to be using the services of that business, and their car's license plate to be a form of identification, but under this resolution the government would not be allowed to view data from the cameras without the consent of every single driver captured in each image.'
THE SUPINE SOCIALIST SLOTHLAND OF MAOWI

hi!LETHARGY ⭐️ LANGUOR ⭐️ LAZINESShi!

Home | Guide for Visitors | Religion | Fashion

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:58 pm

Maowi wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"A government can know if ones innocent if they haven't been accused of a crime or if the jury/judge ruled them innocent in a trial. I can't see how the clause could be improved Ms Ambassador."


'What of nations which contract private companies for, say, their traffic control cameras? A driver can be said to be using the services of that business, and their car's license plate to be a form of identification, but under this resolution the government would not be allowed to view data from the cameras without the consent of every single driver captured in each image.'

"Well, they could simply blur all the other plates."
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Maowi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1241
Founded: Jan 07, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maowi » Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:00 am

Marxist Germany wrote:
Maowi wrote:'What of nations which contract private companies for, say, their traffic control cameras? A driver can be said to be using the services of that business, and their car's license plate to be a form of identification, but under this resolution the government would not be allowed to view data from the cameras without the consent of every single driver captured in each image.'

"Well, they could simply blur all the other plates."


'You're missing my point. How can the government check the data for wrongdoing if they're not allowed to check it unless they already know there's a wrongdoing?'
THE SUPINE SOCIALIST SLOTHLAND OF MAOWI

hi!LETHARGY ⭐️ LANGUOR ⭐️ LAZINESShi!

Home | Guide for Visitors | Religion | Fashion

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:49 am

Maowi wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"Well, they could simply blur all the other plates."


'You're missing my point. How can the government check the data for wrongdoing if they're not allowed to check it unless they already know there's a wrongdoing?'

"That is indeed a good point."
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Quappe
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Apr 12, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Quappe » Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:37 am

Maowi wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"A government can know if ones innocent if they haven't been accused of a crime or if the jury/judge ruled them innocent in a trial. I can't see how the clause could be improved Ms Ambassador."


'What of nations which contract private companies for, say, their traffic control cameras? A driver can be said to be using the services of that business, and their car's license plate to be a form of identification, but under this resolution the government would not be allowed to view data from the cameras without the consent of every single driver captured in each image.'

"Surely though, the 'users' of contracted private companies related to traffic control are the governments, not the people themselves? Is this not a different situation? And surely, companies can just supply the number plates without needing to supply the images?"
Journalist, WAer, Issues Player.
Feel free to hit me up with a telegram! I'm always on the search for diplomatic allies and friendly debate.

User avatar
Austronta
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Oct 09, 2018
Ex-Nation

Specific issues

Postby Austronta » Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:56 am

Marxist Germany wrote:
Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Customer Protection | Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Recognising the individuals' right to privacy;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customer without the explicit consent of that customer as this is clearly a violation of the right to privacy;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally mature and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

Seeking to protect customers from exploitation by businesses;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
    2. A "Guardian" as any legal guardian of a minor, or if none exist, the biological parent;
    3. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;
    4. A "User" as any sapient being who uses or has used the services of a business;

  2. Prohibits:
    1. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
    2. Businesses from using personal data collected from any individual to cause harm or severe distress to the individual the data belongs to;
    3. Governments of member states from viewing the data of a user without the explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to, except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a search warrant has been issued;

  3. Mandates that:
    1. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
    2. Businesses enable users to view the data that the aforementioned business holds on them unless the release of data would compromise the well-being of the user or others;
    3. Personal data processed for any purpose is not kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose unless the user consents to that explicitly and clearly;
    4. Businesses allow users to request the removal of their personal data, and act upon these requests unless there is a clear and very compelling safety or disciplinary reason to do otherwise;

  4. Requires that member states make a private right of action against businesses that don't follow the boundaries established in this resolution;

  5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Customer Protection | Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Recognising the individuals' right to privacy;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customer without the explicit consent of that customer as this is clearly a violation of the right to privacy;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally mature and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

Seeking to protect customers from exploitation by businesses;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
    2. A "Guardian" as any legal parent of a minor, or if none, the biological parent;
    3. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
    4. A "User" as any person who uses or had used the services of a business;

  2. Prohibits:
    1. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
    2. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
    3. Governments of member states from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a warrant has been issued;

  3. Mandates that:
    1. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
    2. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
    3. Personal data processed for any purpose is not kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose unless the user consents to that explicitly and clearly;
    4. Businesses allow users to request the removal of their personal data, and act upon these requests unless there is a clear and very compelling safety or disciplinary reason to do otherwise;

  4. Requires that member states make a private right of action against businesses that don't follow the boundaries established in this resolution;

  5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Customer Protection | Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Recognising the individuals' right to privacy;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customer without the explicit consent of that customer as this is clearly a violation of the right to privacy;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally mature and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

Seeking to protect customers from exploitation by businesses;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
    2. A "Guardian" as any legal parent of a minor, or if none, the biological parent;
    3. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
    4. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;

  2. Prohibits:
    1. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
    2. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
    3. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a warrant has been issued;

  3. Mandates that:
    1. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
    2. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
    3. Personal data processed for any purpose is not kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose unless the user consents to that;
    4. Businesses allow users to request the removal of their personal data, and act upon these requests unless there is a clear and very compelling safety or disciplinary reason to do otherwise;

  4. Requires that member states make a private right of action against businesses that don't follow the boundaries established in this resolution;

  5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Customer Protection | Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Recognising the individuals' right to privacy;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customer without the explicit consent of that customer;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally mature and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

Seeking to protect customers from exploitation by businesses;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
    2. A "Guardian" as a legal guardian of a minor, or, if there is none, a biological parent of the minor;
    3. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
    4. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;

  2. Prohibits:
    1. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
    2. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
    3. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a warrant has been issued;

  3. Mandates that:
    1. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
    2. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
    3. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
    4. Businesses allow users to request the removal of their personal data, and act upon these requests unless there is a clear and very compelling safety or disciplinary reason to do otherwise;

  4. Requires that member states make a private right of action against businesses that don't follow the boundaries established in this resolution;

  5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Customer Protection | Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Recognising the individuals' right to privacy;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customer without the explicit consent of that customer;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally mature and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

Seeking to protect customers from exploitation by businesses;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
    2. A "Guardian" as a legal guardian of a minor, or, if there is none, a biological parent of the minor;
    3. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
    4. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;

  2. Prohibits:
    1. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
    2. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
    3. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a warrant has been issued;

  3. Mandates that:
    1. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
    2. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
    3. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
    4. Businesses allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely and that the business must comply with the request;

  4. Grants any person the right to press charges against a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

  5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Customer Protection

Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customers without the explicit consent of that customer;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a legal guardian of a minor, or, if there is none, a biological parent of the minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
      d. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a user's data in their terms of service;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. Businesses allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely and that the business must comply with the request;


    4. Grants any person the right to press charges against a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Customer Protection

Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from a customers without the explicit consent of that customer;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a legal guardian of a minor, or, if there is none, a biological parent of the minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient;
      d. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from storing the personal data of any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a person's data;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. Businesses allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely and that the business must comply with the request;


    4. Grants any person the right to press charges against a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Protecting Personal Data

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Customer Protection

Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from its users without the explicit consent of that user;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a biological parent and/or legal guardian of a minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;
      d. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from collecting personal data from any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian except when the business cannot identify the user's age;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or severe distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for an investigation or trial;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a person's data;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. Businesses allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely and that the business must comply with the request;


    4. Grants any person the right to sue a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

On Data Protection

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Customer Protection

Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from its users without the explicit consent of that user;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a biological parent and/or legal guardian of a minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;
      d. A "User" as any person who uses the services of a business;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from collecting personal data from any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for an investigation or trial;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will use a person's data;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. Businesses allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely and that the business must comply with the request;


    4. Grants any person the right to sue a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

On Data Protection

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Customer Protection

Proposed by:Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from its users without the explicit consent of that user;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a biological parent and/or legal guardian of a minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from collecting data from any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to except when the information is needed for a trial;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will handle a person's data;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. The data collected only used in a way that is adequate, relevant and limited to only what is necessary;
      e. Businesses allow users to delete their data from the storage of the corporation completely;


    4. Grants any person the right to sue a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Category: Regulation
AoE: Customer Protection



The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that businesses should not be able to collect data from its users without the explicit consent of that user;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;

What is the age of majority that you’re talking about?

Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a biological parent and/or legal guardian of a minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Businesses from collecting data from any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian;
      b. Businesses from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the business holding the data and the user that the data belongs to;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Businesses provide explicit information on how they will handle a person's data;
      b. Businesses enable users to view the data that the said business holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. The data collected only used in a way that is adequate, relevant and limited to only what is necessary;
      e. Businesses allow users to delete their data from the storage of the corporation completely;


    4. Grants any person the right to sue a business/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.

Category: Regulation
AoE: Customer Protection



The World Assembly,

Appalled by the lack of a resolution regarding data protection;

Believing that corporations should not be able to collect data from its users without the explicit consent of that user;

Noting that minors are not fully mentally developed and are not capable of taking decisions on their own without the help of their guardians;


Hereby,

    1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
      a. A "Minor" as any sapient being under the age of majority;
      b. A "Guardian" as a biological parent and/or legal guardian of a minor;
      c. "Personal Data" as any data that can be used to identify a sapient individual;


    2. Prohibits:
      a. Corporations from collecting data from any minor without the explicit consent of their guardian;
      b. Corporations from using personal data collected from a user to cause harm or distress to the user the data belongs to;
      c. Governments from viewing the data without explicit prior consent from both the corporation holding the data and the user that the data belongs to;


    3. Mandates that:
      a. Corporations provide explicit information on how they will handle a person's data;
      b. Corporations enable users to view the data that the said corporation holds on them;
      c. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes;
      d. The data collected only used in a way that is adequate, relevant and limited to only what is necessary;
      e. Corporations allow users to request the deletion of their data from the storage of the corporation completely.


    4. Grants any person the right to sue a corporation/government that doesn't follow the boundaries established in this resolution in an appropriate domestic court and to receive appropriate equitable relief from that tribunal;

    5. Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens privacy from corporations.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:12 am

Quappe wrote:
Maowi wrote:
'What of nations which contract private companies for, say, their traffic control cameras? A driver can be said to be using the services of that business, and their car's license plate to be a form of identification, but under this resolution the government would not be allowed to view data from the cameras without the consent of every single driver captured in each image.'

"Surely though, the 'users' of contracted private companies related to traffic control are the governments, not the people themselves? Is this not a different situation? And surely, companies can just supply the number plates without needing to supply the images?"

"That could actually be the case."
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
United States of Americanas
Envoy
 
Posts: 328
Founded: Jan 23, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby United States of Americanas » Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:43 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Blakenham wrote:"We welcome and support the fundamental ideas and morals behind this resolution - however, we will be voting against this resolution and encourage other WA members to do the same. We believe the provisions within the resolution are too detailed for the application across all WA member states and restricts member nations from carrying out nationally lawful surveillance activities due to Article 2, subsection 3. The provision in this resolution which allows for governments to view the data of a user which a business holds is limited to "where information is needed for a criminal investigation or trial and a search warrant has been issued." It does not consider instances where, for instances dealing with terrorism and extremism, data may be needed in the prevention of crime where a criminal investigation or trial has not been opened, during heightened or national emergencies in which a search warrant may prevent law enforcement or government agencies from preventing crime in Goodspeed in which warrants may not be able to be issued quickly - as it does not consider varying legal systems across nation states. "

"Why should any government spy on it's citizens without their consent or a search warrant?"

And this is exactly why I am voting in support of this.

Governments shouldn’t be spying on citizens unless they have probable cause that they are committing a crime or will commit one and have secured a warrant for surveillance from a federal court.

Businesses shouldn’t be collecting data from minors without parental consent, it’s plain business ethics.
Political Compass as of Jul 17 2022

Economic Left/Right: -7.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15



Damn right I’m a liberal democratic socialist. I sit in the ranks of Caroline Lucas

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:41 am

Protecting Personal Data was passed 9,867 votes to 6,438.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:39 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Protecting Personal Data was passed 9,867 votes to 6,438.


Ambassador Connor looks at the result proudly "My mother would've been so proud of me," his eyes fill up with tears of joy.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:55 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Araraukar wrote:
Protecting Personal Data was passed 9,867 votes to 6,438.


Ambassador Connor looks at the result proudly "My mother would've been so proud of me," his eyes fill up with tears of joy.

OOC: Now you have a nice trophy for your sig
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:58 pm

Aureumterra wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:
Ambassador Connor looks at the result proudly "My mother would've been so proud of me," his eyes fill up with tears of joy.

OOC: Now you have a nice trophy for your sig

OOC:And up goes the rarity of my card (if season 2 will ever happen)
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Tue Apr 16, 2019 3:18 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:Ambassador Connor looks at the result proudly "My mother would've been so proud of me," his eyes fill up with tears of joy.

"Your mother would have been proud of you for writing up a flawed law and refusing to fix its flaws when they were pointed out to you?" Linda asked with a quizzical eyebrow. "Strange cause for pride."
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:03 am

Araraukar wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:Ambassador Connor looks at the result proudly "My mother would've been so proud of me," his eyes fill up with tears of joy.

"Your mother would have been proud of you for writing up a flawed law and refusing to fix its flaws when they were pointed out to you?" Linda asked with a quizzical eyebrow. "Strange cause for pride."

OOC:IA is writing up a repeal so we can fix those
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:10 pm

"Changes have been made as appropriate."

OOC:Added definition of business, added clause 4 and 2b and, tweaked clause 3a.
Last edited by Marxist Germany on Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:39 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:"Changes have been made as appropriate."

OOC:Added definition of business, added clause 4 and 2b and, tweaked clause 3a.

OOC: You should have made a new thread.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:40 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Marxist Germany wrote:"Changes have been made as appropriate."

OOC:Added definition of business, added clause 4 and 2b and, tweaked clause 3a.

OOC: You should have made a new thread.

OOC:I should, but I'm too lazy :P
Last edited by Marxist Germany on Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:49 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: You should have made a new thread.

OOC:I should, but I'm too lazy :P

That's too bad. Reverted to passed version and locked. Make a new thread.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads